JBandJoeyV Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 According to Adam Schefter on ESPN the Bengals have talked about possibly going after Brandon Marshall... Hes my number 1 option, then TO if that fails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschooler Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Without a doubt he is the #1 option. By far. But don't tell Bengaled. He said he isn't an option at all. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cassanos Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 I'd LOVE it, just not sure how we could realistically swing it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kochman Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote] The Broncos will not settle for less than a first-round pick in Brandon Marshall trade talks, according to the National Football Post. "It's either an offer sheet or he plays in Denver next season," Michael Lombardi writes. The Broncos will not negotiate. Lombardi also expects the Seahawks to have competition for Marshall shortly, although he doesn't say which team would jump in. The Patriots, Falcons, and Bengals make sense.[/quote] I would give our first for him. I think we would have to give a little more though. The Seahawks have 2 first and they are both higher picks. I hope we swing something to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cassanos Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 I'd do a First ONLY At least its better than drafting someone and hope for the best, we KNOW what he can do and it would help us...and cost about the same money Though Id rather have T.O. AND our 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatorclaws Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote name='Kochman' date='07 March 2010 - 06:31 PM' timestamp='1268004664' post='868097'] I would give our first for him. I think we would have to give a little more though. The Seahawks have 2 first and they are both higher picks. I hope we swing something to get him. [/quote] You wouldn't have to give more. Once he signs your offer sheet, other teams are out of the picture and the Broncos can decide to match or take your 1st round pick. They can't demand more at that point. At least that's my understanding. Of course a trade could be worked out before Marshall signs an offer, but I believe once he signs there's only 1 choice for the Broncos to make... match or say goodbye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eva4ben-gal Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Wow, never expected to see Marshall linked to the Bengals, even as loosely as this. I would worry about Marshall's baggage but if his old coach in Seattle is pimping him he can't be a total turd right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Seahawks are in a better position to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kochman Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote name='gatorclaws' date='07 March 2010 - 06:35 PM' timestamp='1268004916' post='868101'] You wouldn't have to give more. Once he signs your offer sheet, other teams are out of the picture and the Broncos can decide to match or take your 1st round pick. They can't demand more at that point. At least that's my understanding. Of course a trade could be worked out before Marshall signs an offer, but I believe once he signs there's only 1 choice for the Broncos to make... match or say goodbye. [/quote] I thought he had the first and third round tender and Denver was shopping him for a first. I was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Blake Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Brandon Marshall and Chad would make up the best WR duo in the NFL. Aside from that both T.O. and Antonio Bryant would be big upgrades and improve the offense. The easiest fix to me is this scenario: 1. Sign T.O. or Bryant 2. Swing a trade for Chicago TE Greg Olsen who is available. 3. Focus on O-line in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkansas Bengal Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 I don't believe this source at all. There are 3 reasons I don't think the Bengals will go after Marshall. 1) He will be EXPENSIVE to sign to a long term deal 2) He is a head case who challenges the authority of the coaches 3) He will cost at least a first round draft choice, and Mike Brown hoards them like gold. We would be better off if we end up signing T.O., although with all the dropped passes he's had the last couple of years, he may end up reminding us of Coles... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-GoBengals- Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 i didnt realize shefter was on the mass mailing list the bengals send out on who they may be interested in going after.. id say the list of teams not interested remotely in marshall is much shorter than the list who is... great receiver.. tho some attitude issues off field issues and baggage... the cost is likely high for his services.. he may be one oft he last guys out there unless someone overpays... the broncos dont want him and everyone knows it.. he isnt geting any more expensive and teams arent beating down the door for him.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumble In the Jungle Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote name='cassanos' date='07 March 2010 - 06:32 PM' timestamp='1268004760' post='868098'] I'd do a First ONLY At least its better than drafting someone and hope for the best, we KNOW what he can do and it would help us...and cost about the same money Though Id rather have T.O. AND our 1st [/quote] i'd give them our 1st and 3rd for him since we have an extra 3rd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Blake Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote name='Rumble In the Jungle' date='07 March 2010 - 06:52 PM' timestamp='1268005969' post='868112'] i'd give them our 1st and 3rd for him since we have an extra 3rd round pick. [/quote] Is it official that we have 2 3rd round picks? Or is this based on a projected compensatory pick? Just curious... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumble In the Jungle Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote name='Jeff Blake' date='07 March 2010 - 06:56 PM' timestamp='1268006206' post='868115'] Is it official that we have 2 3rd round picks? Or is this based on a projected compensatory pick? Just curious... [/quote] it is official that we have an extra pick in the 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cassanos Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 T.O. AND Bryant = Marshall ...because the 2 would be much cheaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatorclaws Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='Jamie_B' date='07 March 2010 - 06:40 PM' timestamp='1268005242' post='868105'] Seahawks are in a better position to get him. [/quote] I think they're actually in a worse position. Their picks are too high and they likely don't want to give those up, yet there second round pick isn't enough for the Broncos. I think if Marshall signed an offer with them, they'd have to give up the 6th pick. If they wanted to give up the 14th, it would have to be through a trade which can make things more complicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumble In the Jungle Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='cassanos' date='07 March 2010 - 06:58 PM' timestamp='1268006298' post='868117'] T.O. AND Bryant = Marshall ...because the 2 would be much cheaper. [/quote] that would be bad ass if we picked up both of those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mu Shu Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 I'll insert my input before we do the whole "we didn't need him anyway" thread. I'd break the bank for Marshall. We need a wide receiver in the worst way, and instead of drafting one and hoping he develops, just trade for one that's already proven himself as an elite. It would be the perfect counter to Baltimore getting Anquan. I'd trade whatever was needed to get him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBandJoeyV Posted March 8, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='Rumble In the Jungle' date='07 March 2010 - 06:58 PM' timestamp='1268006291' post='868116'] it is official that we have an extra pick in the 3rd. [/quote] Since when? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='Rumble In the Jungle' date='07 March 2010 - 06:58 PM' timestamp='1268006291' post='868116'] it is official that we have an extra pick in the 3rd. [/quote] no it isn't. They aren't announced until the end of March at the league meetings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschooler Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [url="http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter"][b][color="#0a0501"]Adam_Schefter[/color][/b][/url] [url=""] [/url] Bengals have contemplated pursuing Marshall. How serious the Bengals will be still is a matter of discussion within the organization. [url="http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/10141293231"]43 minutes ago [/url]via web [url="http://twitter.com/joereedy"][b][color="#0a0501"]joereedy[/color][/b][/url] [url=""] [/url] The rumors on Marshall to the [url="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23bengals"][color="#0a0501"]#bengals[/color][/url] are mostly a smoke screen. Meant to drive up the price with Seattle. [url="http://twitter.com/joereedy/status/10142608438"]about 2 hours ago [/url]via [url="http://www.tweetdeck.com/"]TweetDeck[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumble In the Jungle Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='Bengals1181' date='07 March 2010 - 07:12 PM' timestamp='1268007171' post='868132'] no it isn't. They aren't announced until the end of March at the league meetings. [/quote] well my fault, i really though for some reason someone posted that we are getting a 3rd compensatory pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='Rumble In the Jungle' date='07 March 2010 - 07:15 PM' timestamp='1268007326' post='868137'] well my fault, i really though for some reason someone posted that we are getting a 3rd compensatory pic. [/quote] we most likely will, but its far from official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gatorclaws Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 [quote name='oldschooler' date='07 March 2010 - 07:15 PM' timestamp='1268007310' post='868136'] [url="http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter"][b][color="#0a0501"]Adam_Schefter[/color][/b][/url] [url=""] [/url] Bengals have contemplated pursuing Marshall. How serious the Bengals will be still is a matter of discussion within the organization. [url="http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/10141293231"]43 minutes ago [/url]via web [url="http://twitter.com/joereedy"][b][color="#0a0501"]joereedy[/color][/b][/url] [url=""] [/url] The rumors on Marshall to the [url="http://twitter.com/search?q=%23bengals"][color="#0a0501"]#bengals[/color][/url] are mostly a smoke screen. Meant to drive up the price with Seattle. [url="http://twitter.com/joereedy/status/10142608438"]about 2 hours ago [/url]via [url="http://www.tweetdeck.com/"]TweetDeck[/url] [/quote] Possibly to also drive down the price for TO/Bryant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.