JC Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 Feels weird. Go Dolphins and ex-Bengals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC Posted January 7, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 "Pro bowl safety, Reggie Nelson"...swingandamiss on that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 I don't particularly care for any team playing this weekend, but Go Dolphins. Only because of who they play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B.A.B. Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 9 minutes ago, JC said: "Pro bowl safety, Reggie Nelson"...swingandamiss on that one. Dunno why the fuck we let him go smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 3 minutes ago, B.A.B. said: Dunno why the fuck we let him go smh I don't either other than the fact they felt they had to justify spending a 3rd round pick on Williams. Williams got a little over $20 million for 4 years. Reggie got $8.5 million for 2 years. Definitely would have preferred they kept Reggie for that money. I seriously doubt any team other the Bengals would have given Williams $5 million a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooky Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 3 points: 1.What's the point of challenging when the booth can't get it right? They seem so hesitant to over-rule the refs this year. 2. I can't stand Will McDonagh. I think he sucks. I don't care that I probably butchered his name. 3. Don't play the JJ Watt drinking game. You will lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 25 minutes ago, B.A.B. said: Dunno why the fuck we let him go smh Yep, big part of why his former team will be watching these games from the couch. That kick return was crucial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooky Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 One more: I don't care much who wins today, but since I've started watching, I find myself rooting against Houston. Probably because they shouldn't be there. Only because they have to have an AFCS team in it. And it seems like the announcers and the league seem to be rooting for them. Also, Bill O'Brien really annoys me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 Just now, Hooky said: One more: I don't care much who wins today, but since I've started watching, I find myself rooting against Houston. Probably because they shouldn't be there. Only because they have to have an AFCS team in it. And it seems like the announcers and the league seem to be rooting for them. Also, Bill O'Brien really annoys me. #1 defense in the NFL. They earned it. It's not like there's another team with more wins sitting at home like some years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saphead Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 Houston can go fuck a goat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 7, 2017 Report Share Posted January 7, 2017 That Houston defense is going to be scary good if Watt is anything close to his old self next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 Houston might be a QB away from being the best team in the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turningpoint Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 2 hours ago, Randle P McMurphy said: I don't either other than the fact they felt they had to justify spending a 3rd round pick on Williams. Williams got a little over $20 million for 4 years. Reggie got $8.5 million for 2 years. Definitely would have preferred they kept Reggie for that money. I seriously doubt any team other the Bengals would have given Williams $5 million a year. I'll be very let down if this team passes on Malik hooker if he is available this spring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 That's game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 12 minutes ago, turningpoint said: I'll be very let down if this team passes on Malik hooker if he is available this spring. I'm an OSU fan/homer myself but the Safety position isn't close on "needs" as far as the Bengals go. LB'er and Center are far bigger "needs" along with some pass rush help than the Safety position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Jason said: That's game. Unfortunately for the Raiders and their fans. I was kind of pulling for the Raiders since the Bengals didn't make it. Plus the Texans can eat a dick for knocking us out in the 1st round 2 years in a row!! lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, Randle P McMurphy said: I'm an OSU fan/homer myself but the Safety position isn't close on "needs" as far as the Bengals go. LB'er and Center are far bigger "needs" along with some pass rush help than the Safety position. The Bengals tend to go BPA over need. Hooker is currently #3 in the CBSSports.com rankings, so if he's there at 9, odds are good he's BPA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 30 minutes ago, Jason said: Houston might be a QB away from being the best team in the NFL. Hell, they beat us with bigger scrubs than Osweiler. (T.J. Yates and a washed up Matt Schaub) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 Just now, Jason said: The Bengals tend to go BPA over need. Hooker is currently #3 in the CBSSports.com rankings, so if he's there at 9, odds are good he's BPA. I can agree with the BPA thing BUT................ George Illoka just signed a 5 year $30 million contract and Shawn Williams a 4 year $20.185 million contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 6 minutes ago, Randle P McMurphy said: I can agree with the BPA thing BUT................ George Illoka just signed a 5 year $30 million contract and Shawn Williams a 4 year $20.185 million contract. And Hooker would be a much better player than SW. But you are probably right, I don't see them taking a safety in the top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, Jason said: The Bengals tend to go BPA over need. Hooker is currently #3 in the CBSSports.com rankings, so if he's there at 9, odds are good he's BPA. And I know the Bengals tend to go BPA but look at the 2015 draft. They knew both Whitworth and Smith were going to be FA's. One could argue they drafted based on "needs", maybe not immediate needs but needs nonetheless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madieu Superstar Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, Randle P McMurphy said: I can agree with the BPA thing BUT................ George Illoka just signed a 5 year $30 million contract and Shawn Williams a 4 year $20.185 million contract. Williams should be playing LB, not safety. Picking a real safety, gives you help at 2 positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 Just now, Randle P McMurphy said: And I know the Bengals tend to go BPA but look at the 2015 draft. They knew both Whitworth and Smith were going to be FA's. One could argue they drafted based on "needs", maybe not immediate needs but needs nonetheless. No, I think they really had Ced and Fisher at the top of their board for both picks. They thought Ced was a top 5 or 10 talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 Just now, Jason said: And Hooker would be a much better player than SW. But you are probably right, I don't see them taking a safety in the top 10. By FAR Hooker would be an upgrade over Shawn Williams. We both know they're not going to cut Williams 1 year after a long term deal though. Maybe if there wasn't $1.6 million in dead money by doing so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted January 8, 2017 Report Share Posted January 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, Randle P McMurphy said: By FAR Hooker would be an upgrade over Shawn Williams. We both know they're not going to cut Williams 1 year after a long term deal though. Maybe if there wasn't $1.6 million in dead money by doing so. Who said anything about "cut"? Nickel LB might be a good fit for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.