Jason Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 1 hour ago, spicoli said: there are no OT's even in the discussion for a top 10 pick....it would be a HUGE reach. Ramczyk is getting close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 36 minutes ago, Jason said: Ramczyk is getting close. I just can't see it....never know though I suppose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatternMaster Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 Reuben Foster, he's a banged up LB that plays a high impact position. Bama is known for running their players into the ground because of their ultra competitive practices and by the time they get to the NFL they have the body of a 5 year vet. Foster is a good run defender but the NFL is moving to 4-2-5 base defense and run defending LB's are going the way of the FB. Foster is an average pass defender but why spend a top 10 pick on a guy that is basically younger Rey Maualuga with more injury concerns, I would rather get a LB in rounds 2-4 that can cover lb's as we have run stuffers already on the roster. Jayon Brown, Duke Riley, or even Tyus Bowser are more athletic LB's that can cover better than Foster and don't have his injury history. I would compare Foster to a luxury car that has engine and axle problems, they are fixable but do you want spend big money on a car with that type of damage. A LB with a documented history of concussions and shoulder concerns are HUGE medical red flags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 Charles Robinson @CharlesRobinson: Some #NFL teams are expecting #Clemson WR Mike Williams to run his 40 around 4.65. They're hoping he can do better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyrid Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 9 minutes ago, spicoli said: Charles Robinson @CharlesRobinson: Some #NFL teams are expecting #Clemson WR Mike Williams to run his 40 around 4.65. They're hoping he can do better. If he's that slow, I don't think you can take him in the top 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 1 minute ago, happyrid said: If he's that slow, I don't think you can take him in the top 10. even if he manages to run in the 4.5's, he's not worth a top 10 pick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostInDaJungle Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 On 2/23/2017 at 10:01 AM, Le Tigre said: Wow. Watching this roller coaster of threads "He's great"..."He's OK"..."He sucks"... What a ride! And once the combine comes and goes, the whole big board will shift around anyway. Talking about the draft in February is like wondering what you'll name your kids before the first date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBengal Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 On 2/23/2017 at 7:08 PM, spicoli said: there are no OT's even in the discussion for a top 10 pick....it would be a HUGE reach. You are way off. Ramczyk will go high. I wouldnt be suprised if he was off the board before the Bengals pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpoore Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 Charles Robinson @CharlesRobinson: Some #NFL teams are expecting #Clemson WR Mike Williams to run his 40 around 4.65. They're hoping he can do better.If that happens i would take davis. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 You are way off. Ramczyk will go high. I wouldnt be suprised if he was off the board before the Bengals pick. Yeah ok, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 If that happens i would take davis. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile appBengals do NOT need to take a top 10 WR regardless of who it is....They'd be better served taking one of the RBs if they can't get one of the defensive players they've got their eyes on.Sent from my Moto G (4) using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 3 hours ago, LostInDaJungle said: And once the combine comes and goes, the whole big board will shift around anyway. Talking about the draft in February is like wondering what you'll name your kids before the first date. Lol. You've got that right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omgdrdoom Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 Fournette Any WR Anyone that doesn't play on the o-line or at linebacker for that matter. For fuck's sake, fix what's broken on this team. I'm not saying to reach for a 2nd round prospect at #9, but if there isn't a top lineman or top LB available at 9? Trade the pick down, I'm sure loads of teams would love to make their way into the top 10, especially if 1 of the 2 safeties or any of the top 3 edge rushers are still there. At least 2 of our first 3 picks should be oline and LB. RBs and WRs are great and all, but Barry Sanders couldn't run behind this line and not even A.J. Green is going to be catching many passes if Dalton is broken in half by week 3. FIX THE FUCKING LINE!!!! ...please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 Dane BruglerVerified account @dpbrugler 4m4 minutes ago More WR Mike Williams said a "long season" is why he won't run his 40 at the Combine. Wants more prep time. I knew that was gonna happen....he's been training and he can't break 4.6 that's why he doesn't wanna run, plain and simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpoore Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 Fournette Any WR Anyone that doesn't play on the o-line or at linebacker for that matter. For fuck's sake, fix what's broken on this team. I'm not saying to reach for a 2nd round prospect at #9, but if there isn't a top lineman or top LB available at 9? Trade the pick down, I'm sure loads of teams would love to make their way into the top 10, especially if 1 of the 2 safeties or any of the top 3 edge rushers are still there. At least 2 of our first 3 picks should be oline and LB. RBs and WRs are great and all, but Barry Sanders couldn't run behind this line and not even A.J. Green is going to be catching many passes if Dalton is broken in half by week 3. FIX THE FUCKING LINE!!!! ...please?I dont agree that lb is a need. U can get a leter round one but not in top 2 rounds. We only play 2 lbs 75 percent of the time and thats burfict and vigil. De we should go walker in the second. And then elflien even if we have to trade up for him. Every line can look better if u have a decent center. They make the whole line click. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted March 3, 2017 Report Share Posted March 3, 2017 8 hours ago, omgdrdoom said: Fournette Any WR Anyone that doesn't play on the o-line or at linebacker for that matter. For fuck's sake, fix what's broken on this team. I'm not saying to reach for a 2nd round prospect at #9, but if there isn't a top lineman or top LB available at 9? Trade the pick down, I'm sure loads of teams would love to make their way into the top 10, especially if 1 of the 2 safeties or any of the top 3 edge rushers are still there. At least 2 of our first 3 picks should be oline and LB. RBs and WRs are great and all, but Barry Sanders couldn't run behind this line and not even A.J. Green is going to be catching many passes if Dalton is broken in half by week 3. FIX THE FUCKING LINE!!!! ...please? There are good O-linemen that could upgrade the O-line that will be available in rounds 2 through 4. You don't have to take one in 1. Especially this year. This is a weak OT class and an average Guard class. Not bad at center, but no one "elite". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpoore Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 There are good O-linemen that could upgrade the O-line that will be available in rounds 2 through 4. You don't have to take one in 1. Especially this year. This is a weak OT class and an average Guard class. Not bad at center, but no one "elite".My top 2 olinemen are elflien and feeney. Love elflien due to his versatility. 2 time 1st team all american at guard 1 time 1st team all american at center. Feeney is jjust a stud. I actually think there are 5-6 starting guards in the top 75 rounds. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpoore Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Picks not rounds Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omgdrdoom Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 8 hours ago, Jpoore said: I dont agree that lb is a need. U can get a leter round one but not in top 2 rounds. We only play 2 lbs 75 percent of the time and thats burfict and vigil. De we should go walker in the second. And then elflien even if we have to trade up for him. Every line can look better if u have a decent center. They make the whole line click. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Sure, LB isn't a need. A fucking dinosaur version of Karlos Dansby took over SEVENTY (70!!!!!) PERCENT of our defensive snaps last year. Rey Maualuga had 30%. Vincent Rey had 55%. Which fucking universe do you live in as a Bengals fan to post most of the shit that you do? 6 hours ago, Jason said: There are good O-linemen that could upgrade the O-line that will be available in rounds 2 through 4. You don't have to take one in 1. Especially this year. This is a weak OT class and an average Guard class. Not bad at center, but no one "elite". Yeah that's why I wouldn't have a problem trading our #9 away and not even ending up with a very high pick this year. I wouldn't hate seeing a pass rusher at #9, but I really, really, really don't want to see RB or WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpoore Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 Lb is not a 1st round need wr or de is. Rey takes over the 30 percent of snaps that malaluga got vigil takes over dansbys role. Problem solved. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted March 4, 2017 Report Share Posted March 4, 2017 20 minutes ago, Jpoore said: Lb is not a 1st round need wr or de is. Rey takes over the 30 percent of snaps that malaluga got vigil takes over dansbys role. Problem solved. Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Don't focus too much on need with any pick, but especially top 10. Take the best guy on the board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachMinich Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 Anyone who doesn't make their money sacking the QB... need a DE at 9 Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SocalBengalEd Posted March 5, 2017 Report Share Posted March 5, 2017 I didn't like Taco Charlton before I especially don't like him after running a 4.92 forty. When his game is about speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatternMaster Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 7 hours ago, SocalBengalEd said: I didn't like Taco Charlton before I especially don't like him after running a 4.92 forty. When his game is about speed. JJ Watt ran a 4.91, it really doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted March 6, 2017 Report Share Posted March 6, 2017 1 hour ago, PatternMaster said: JJ Watt ran a 4.91, it really doesn't matter. Taco isn't half the player Watt was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.