oldschooler, on 29 July 2010 - 03:12 PM, said:
How in the fuck does them having an upgrade on the roster equate to them being the problem
with the passing game struggles? And how does them expecting a unit that had little experience
together, and in some cases, NFL experience period equate to that? Seriously. How does that
even make sense? You are talking about the future. Them getting better. That should be a given.
I was talking about last season. And how they didn't make any moves that wasn't already on
last year's roster to the "shitty" O-line.
Do YOU get it now?
Or are you going to call me obtuse again? lol
I said "being obtuse" meaning it was intentional that you were ignoring the meaning of the post.. Not that you were stupid.. I can see you didn't get my meaning with that, and I apologize for any offense.
I don't understand why you are confused, and why you seem to be getting so upset...
It's simple... The line wasn't very good at pass protection last season... They also have a first round pick from last year that didn't get to take over RT as they had planned. I believe the coached didn't sign or draft any replacements because the expect Andre to take over RT (an upgrade over last season) and they expect Cook and Mathis/Livings to get better (= getting better at C and LG).
Like I said, I think we mostly agree.. The only difference is that I think the line play from last year wasn't that great (especially in pass pro) and I don't think lack of drafting/signing new starters is not an argument against that belief.
Can we keep the argument civil please?

Help





























