[savagehenry54]

.....79-your-2010-cincinnati-bengals-final-roster-prediction

Here is my final roster predictions. Pretty sure I nailed it. ;)

[eva4ben-gal]

That's a solid attempt and could be right on. The thing I love most about all of the final roster predictions this year — the only rookie free agent that has a shot at making the team is a long snapper.

[savagehenry54]

eva4ben-gal, on 29 July 2010 - 04:27 PM, said:

That's a solid attempt and could be right on. The thing I love most about all of the final roster predictions this year — the only rookie free agent that has a shot at making the team is a long snapper.

Heck yea, hadn't even thought of that and it does bode well imo. Never a good thing if even the undrafted guys have of a chance cuz that means probably not much quality of depth. Bengals have good depth throughout the roster this year I believe.

[Patmo]

Nice work,Savage. Agree with all your picks except maybe Hebert. I'm thinking that maybe there's an outside chance that Miles makes it.

[akiliMVP]

Just FYI you have 54 players on the roster

Mine is pretty much the same except I think Cosby is going to stick at WR and Trent is the 54th man. Also Clark Harris stays as the longer snapper.

[savagehenry54]

akiliMVP, on 29 July 2010 - 04:58 PM, said:

Just FYI you have 54 players on the roster

Mine is pretty much the same except I think Cosby is going to stick at WR and Trent is the 54th man. Also Clark Harris stays as the longer snapper.

Aww man. LOL.... I'll have to recount now, but I'm thinking that you counted Mathis twice as I did list him twice for depth chart purposes since he is the interior guy who can play left or right guard.

[akiliMVP]

savagehenry54, on 29 July 2010 - 05:02 PM, said:

Aww man. LOL.... I'll have to recount now, but I'm thinking that you counted Mathis twice as I did list him twice for depth chart purposes since he is the interior guy who can play left or right guard.

Yep I totally did

[Bengals1181]

pretty spot on IMO. Only things I would change is Nelson over Hebert, and possibly a 10th olienmen (Hudson) over Hodge. With MJ you essentially have the typical 6 LB's we keep, Rey Muck and Rivers can backup the middle, and with the teams we play this year we will be playing a lot of nickel and will only have 2 LB's on the field anyway in those situations.

[savagehenry54]

Bengals1181, on 29 July 2010 - 05:13 PM, said:

pretty spot on IMO. Only things I would change is Nelson over Hebert, and possibly a 10th olienmen (Hudson) over Hodge. With MJ you essentially have the typical 6 LB's we keep, Rey Muck and Rivers can backup the middle, and with the teams we play this year we will be playing a lot of nickel and will only have 2 LB's on the field anyway in those situations.

Good points. I could def see what you submit here playing out.