Jump to content

Holy shit guys, we're 5 and 2!


Recommended Posts

[quote name='MichaelWeston' timestamp='1320113047' post='1054437']

Again I really dont think having an opinion that others dont share is a troll. I think the personal attacks and name calling is a much worse offense.
[/quote]


as I mentioned the other day, your act is old. Please stop pretending that you don't know what you're doing. All it is, is failed attempts at trolling and trying to get under people's skins, akin to your lame attempt with your avatar picture. You're not fooling anyone, so stop playing dumb and crying victim.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MichaelWeston' timestamp='1320118310' post='1054499']
So answer me this, 1 game to go and you need to get into the playoffs would you rather play the Bills or Niners or the Chargers, Steelers, Ravens, Pats, Jets, Texans, Giants, Eagles, Packers, Lions, Saints, Falcons?
[/quote]

you're argument is based on sterotypes based on past seasons, not this season.

And I'd rather face the lions, falcons, giants, chargers or ravens this year than the 49ers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MichaelWeston' timestamp='1320114410' post='1054457']

Please find me the post where I say Whit is not a good LT.

Name me a player on the Bills offense that scares you. How about the D? Now name me a player on the niners outside of Gore who you are fearful of. Neither one of those teams are legit. They are benefiting from a down year and will get exposed at the end of the year like all of these teams do.
[/quote]

Who cares about individuals? They are 5-2 and 6-1 with wins over New England, Tampa, and Detroit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MichaelWeston' timestamp='1320118310' post='1054499']
So answer me this, 1 game to go and you need to get into the playoffs would you rather play the Bills or Niners or the Chargers, Steelers, Ravens, Pats, Jets, Texans, Giants, Eagles, Packers, Lions, Saints, Falcons?
[/quote]

I'll take the Packers. They'll have the #1 Seed wrapped up by then.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BengalBacker' timestamp='1320134654' post='1054525']
I have to say here that while I don't agree with a lot of what Michael Weston says, he's not a troll. He's not just trying to stir shit, he's saying what he believes to be true. He could end up being right. Just like many think we are going to fold against the "good" teams, how many thought the 49ers, Buffalo and Detroit would be where they are are before the season started? Could one or two of those teams turn out to be a flash in the pan? Wouldn't be the first time. I'm not predicting either way, but it's not unreasonable to think some teams have played over their head.

:shrug:
[/quote]


x2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BengalBacker' timestamp='1320134654' post='1054525']
I have to say here that while I don't agree with a lot of what Michael Weston says, he's not a troll. He's not just trying to stir shit, he's saying what he believes to be true. He could end up being right. Just like many think we are going to fold against the "good" teams, how many thought the 49ers, Buffalo and Detroit would be where they are are before the season started? Could one or two of those teams turn out to be a flash in the pan? Wouldn't be the first time. I'm not predicting either way, but it's not unreasonable to think some teams have played over their head.

:shrug:
[/quote]

Wrong.

He spent twenty seven posts saying he knew nothing about Fred Jackson, and not giving a single reason for his saying the Bills are a bad team. Then when I gave his stats, suddenly he's an expert on what made FJ, someone he had admitted never seeing make a good run,
a great back.

Troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this just happened to get tweeted.



[url="http://twitter.com/#!/RichCimini"]RichCimini[/url] [color=#999999][size=3]Rich Cimini[/size][/color]
[color=#999999][size=2]
[/size][/color]

[font=Arial,]
[url="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Bills"][s]#[/s][b]Bills[/b][/url] RB Fred Jackson has 1,074 yds from scrimmage. Only 1 other player in team history had more through 7 gs -- O.J. Simpson. [url="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Jets"][s]#[/s][b]Jets[/b][/url][/font]

[url="http://twitter.com/#!/RichCimini/status/131373473187631104"]1 minute ago[/url] [size=2][url="http://twitter.com/#"][b]Favorite[/b][/url] [url="http://twitter.com/#"][b]Retweet[/b][/url] [url="http://twitter.com/#"][b]Reply[/b][/url][/size]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bengals1181' timestamp='1320157185' post='1054641']
this just happened to get tweeted.



[url="http://twitter.com/#!/RichCimini"]RichCimini[/url] [color=#999999][size=3]Rich Cimini[/size][/color]




[url="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Bills"][s]#[/s][b]Bills[/b][/url] RB Fred Jackson has 1,074 yds from scrimmage. Only 1 other player in team history had more through 7 gs -- O.J. Simpson. [url="http://twitter.com/#!/search?q=%23Jets"][s]#[/s][b]Jets[/b][/url]

[url="http://twitter.com/#!/RichCimini/status/131373473187631104"]1 minute ago[/url] [size=2][url="http://twitter.com/#"][b]Favorite[/b][/url] [url="http://twitter.com/#"][b]Retweet[/b][/url] [url="http://twitter.com/#"][b]Reply[/b][/url][/size]
[/quote]

I only saw [i][b]fifty [/b][/i]of those yards, so the other thousand never happened!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BengalBacker' timestamp='1320134654' post='1054525']
I have to say here that while I don't agree with a lot of what Michael Weston says, he's not a troll. He's not just trying to stir shit, he's saying what he believes to be true. He could end up being right. Just like many think we are going to fold against the "good" teams, how many thought the 49ers, Buffalo and Detroit would be where they are are before the season started? Could one or two of those teams turn out to be a flash in the pan? Wouldn't be the first time. I'm not predicting either way, but it's not unreasonable to think some teams have played over their head.

:shrug:
[/quote]
I agree.

I don't think he is saying this stuff to stir the pot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='GoBengals' timestamp='1320113819' post='1054447']
the offense will probably have to put up points to win those... on their own.. defense and teams is handing them mega badass field position and scoring points on thier own... the defense and ST play give me a footbal erection.. [b]this would be a superbowl team if dalton were a really good QB[/b]... green simpson gresham are all playing really really well..

time will tell...
[/quote]

Could you explain why he is outplaying Palmer's first year as a starter, in his rookie year, with a first year OC (whom I believe you labeled "a rinky dink joke of an OC from the UFL"), and no off season workouts and rookie or 2nd-3rd year players on most skill positions on offense?

Just curious since I have seen you avoid the threads pointing this out, and continue to say the same lame crap.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Lucid' timestamp='1320334972' post='1055422']

Could you explain why he is outplaying Palmer's first year as a starter, in his rookie year, with a first year OC (whom I believe you labeled "a rinky dink joke of an OC from the UFL"), and no off season workouts and rookie or 2nd-3rd year players on most skill positions on offense?

Just curious since I have seen you avoid the threads pointing this out, and continue to say the same lame crap.
[/quote]

Well there has been some movement - originally AD was worse than Casey Bramlet. Now he is just not "[b]really [/b]good", which means that he might be just "good".

For me, I don't have an issue with having the other teammates doing their part rather than waiting for the QB to save the day. There's enough credit for everyone if we win.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[b]• MOST OVERLOOKED STORYLINE -- The Bengals are contenders:[/b] Buoyed by their Mike Zimmer-coached defense and that boffo rookie QB-receiver combination of Andy Dalton and A.J. Green, 5-2 Cincinnati has already topped its 2010 win total of four and is breathing down the neck of first-place Pittsburgh (6-2) in the AFC North. Did anyone see this coming? Not me. I picked the Bengals to be the worst team in the NFL this season and win the Andrew Luck sweepstakes. And adding to their hot streak, Bengals owner Mike Brown might have executed the steal of the century (at least the new one) by shipping Carson Palmer to the desperate Raiders.

Read more: [url="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/don_banks/11/03/midseason.report/index.html#ixzz1cfH6DqWE"]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/don_banks/11/03/midseason.report/index.html#ixzz1cfH6DqWE[/url]

[b]• COORDINATOR OF THE YEAR: Mike Zimmer, Cincinnati defensive coordinator:[/b] Despite losing standout cornerback Johnathan Joseph in free agency, Zimmer has pieced together a Bengals defense that ranks fourth overall in yards allowed (297.4), fourth in points allowed (17.6), second in rushing (85.4), and has given up just six touchdown passes, third lowest in the league. The Bengals D is the biggest reason Cincinnati is a surprising 5-2.

Read more: [url="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/don_banks/11/03/midseason.report/index.html#ixzz1cfHSscYn"]http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/don_banks/11/03/midseason.report/index.html#ixzz1cfHSscYn[/url]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Lucid' timestamp='1320334972' post='1055422']

Could you explain why he is outplaying Palmer's first year as a starter, in his rookie year, with a first year OC (whom I believe you labeled "a rinky dink joke of an OC from the UFL"), and no off season workouts and rookie or 2nd-3rd year players on most skill positions on offense?

Just curious since I have seen you avoid the threads pointing this out, and continue to say the same lame crap.
[/quote]
Go's affection for Dalton will always be lacking until #14 completes his first shovel pass.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BengalBacker' timestamp='1320134654' post='1054525']
I have to say here that while I don't agree with a lot of what Michael Weston says, he's not a troll.

:shrug:
[/quote]

Have to wholeheartedly disagree. Weston has been a turd ladle ever since he has started posting. All he enjoys doing on this site is stirring and serving up crap to laugh at the reactions of others when they taste the soup.

Jamie may play Devil's Advocate to the hilt, but he will at least admit when his stance is wrong when there is zero chance that he could be right. Weston is worse than a 13 year old in World of Warcraft's Trade Channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BengalBacker' timestamp='1320134654' post='1054525']
I have to say here that while I don't agree with a lot of what Michael Weston says, he's not a troll. He's not just trying to stir shit, he's saying what he believes to be true. He could end up being right. Just like many think we are going to fold against the "good" teams, how many thought the 49ers, Buffalo and Detroit would be where they are are before the season started? Could one or two of those teams turn out to be a flash in the pan? Wouldn't be the first time. I'm not predicting either way, but it's not unreasonable to think some teams have played over their head.
:shrug:
[/quote]

He's not a troll, he's just a dumbass? Either way, no good...

Don't take up debating, Weston, just some friendly advice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Xombie' timestamp='1320355186' post='1055557']

Have to wholeheartedly disagree. Weston has been a turd ladle ever since he has started posting. All he enjoys doing on this site is stirring and serving up crap to laugh at the reactions of others when they taste the soup.

Jamie may play Devil's Advocate to the hilt, but he will at least admit when his stance is wrong when there is zero chance that he could be right. Weston is worse than a 13 year old in World of Warcraft's Trade Channel.
[/quote]

I dont get it, because I said I did not think they would be that great this year? Because I don't think teams are as good as their records? You disagreee with my opinion thats fine, the rest of that is unwarranted.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='GoBengals' timestamp='1320113819' post='1054447']


our opponents have a winning percentage below .400, even if you pretend we lost to all of them its still below .500....we should be 7-0... look what the 49ers did to this offense..
[/quote]


:39: Interesting, interesting...



So how are your Raiders looking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='MichaelWeston' timestamp='1320357922' post='1055573']
I will try to do better, I am really not trying to troll, I just don't often see the purpose of posting things that everyone would agree with because I don't think it furthers discussion.

I am not a great debater, pretty good though. I will work at it more.
[/quote]
While you might not be a great debater, I think that you are aspiring to be a baiter... and would probably rate as a Master Baiter at that!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='USN Bengal' timestamp='1320359118' post='1055594']
While you might not be a great debater, I think that you are aspiring to be a baiter... and would probably rate as a Master Baiter at that!
[/quote]

Thats Classic!! Hilarious. What are you going to tell a "Not" joke next?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...