Jump to content

switching to sprint


Recommended Posts

[quote name='BengalsOwn' timestamp='1338091211' post='1132769']
The Pentastar 3.6 is no slouch, and I think the Charger has a different intake giving it even more horsepower than my Journey has (280 horsepower, not bad at all for a grocery getter lol)
[/quote]

[color=#000000][font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=3] 292-horsepower[/size][/font][/color]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1338124186' post='1132785']
[color=#000000][font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][size=3]292-horsepower[/size][/font][/color]
[/quote]

3800lb car...

You get almost 100 more ponies with the R/T...

...just saying!

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bunghole' timestamp='1338209034' post='1132855']
3800lb car...

You get almost 100 more ponies with the R/T...

...just saying!

:lol:
[/quote]


really what am i going to do with it though? i dont live in a rural area where i can put that to use without the cops being around, i'm in a highly populated area, hell you used to live here to know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, by no means do I live in as populous area as you do, but its still pretty urbanized in a lot of places around Cincinnati and I own a 300-plus horsepower car (Mustang GT) and I find ways to...creatively accelerate.

:lol:

I'm just teasing you anyway. Its a nice looking car and you obviously can get what you want. How long have you owned that Pontiac G6? IIRC you haven't had it that long...something wrong with it, or is it a lease or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bunghole' timestamp='1338212971' post='1132866']
Well, by no means do I live in as populous area as you do, but its still pretty urbanized in a lot of places around Cincinnati and I own a 300-plus horsepower car (Mustang GT) and I find ways to...creatively accelerate.

:lol:

I'm just teasing you anyway. Its a nice looking car and you obviously can get what you want. How long have you owned that Pontiac G6? IIRC you haven't had it that long...something wrong with it, or is it a lease or something?
[/quote]

I had it for 6 years, it started falling apart last year from having to replace the power steering to O2 sensors, ect.. was happy to get rid of it after i paid it off two weeks ago, it was becoming a money pit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1338213132' post='1132867']
I had it for 6 years, it started falling apart last year from having to replace the power steering to O2 sensors, ect.. was happy to get rid of it after i paid it off two weeks ago, it was becoming a money pit.
[/quote]

Wow...I remember you talking on here about when you bought it...its really been six years? Yipes! Anyway, I am glad you are buying the remodeled Charger...their earlier variant was just plain ugly (especially compared to the Challenger) but the new one is so much better looking, especially the rear end with those retro/cool tail lights.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bunghole' timestamp='1338215569' post='1132869']
Wow...I remember you talking on here about when you bought it...its really been six years? Yipes! Anyway, I am glad you are buying the remodeled Charger...their earlier variant was just plain ugly (especially compared to the Challenger) but the new one is so much better looking, especially the rear end with those retro/cool tail lights.
[/quote]

I know, time flies, crazy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Go Skins' timestamp='1338244538' post='1132909']
I saw Jamie's new car on Saturday, it is pretty nice and I am jealous of the GPS (the screen is huge).
[/quote]

The fact that he has to Fred Flintstone his max acceleration speak volumes...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[url="http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/30/technology/iphone-carrier-compare/index.htm?hpt=hp_t3"]http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/30/technology/iphone-carrier-compare/index.htm?hpt=hp_t3[/url]

[b]Sprint:[/b] Sprint's network speeds clocked in last in every city but New York, and it wasn't even close.

Sprint's 3G network offered speeds of less than a third of AT&T's network in Chicago and Los Angeles. By far its best speed performance is in New York, where its median speed was three-quarters that of AT&T.

The carrier's response times were also quite slow, often taking nearly three times longer than Verizon to start loading content. Sprint's network lag was the greatest in all six cities.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have Sprint, live in Cincinnati and have zero issues whatsoever with calls, texts or data on a Samsung Galaxy S2. I think Sprint is going to have many customers switch over to them when Verizon's unlimited data ends. My girlfriend pays $122 a month for her phone from Verizon. That's just ridiculous.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Go Skins' timestamp='1338392908' post='1133087']
[url="http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/30/technology/iphone-carrier-compare/index.htm?hpt=hp_t3"]http://money.cnn.com...x.htm?hpt=hp_t3[/url]

[b]Sprint:[/b] Sprint's network speeds clocked in last in every city but New York, and it wasn't even close.

Sprint's 3G network offered speeds of less than a third of AT&T's network in Chicago and Los Angeles. By far its best speed performance is in New York, where its median speed was three-quarters that of AT&T.

The carrier's response times were also quite slow, often taking nearly three times longer than Verizon to start loading content. Sprint's network lag was the greatest in all six cities.
[/quote]

Most liklely due to being unlimited data and I would think having more people on their network because of that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Go Skins' timestamp='1338392908' post='1133087']
[url="http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/30/technology/iphone-carrier-compare/index.htm?hpt=hp_t3"]http://money.cnn.com...x.htm?hpt=hp_t3[/url]

[b]Sprint:[/b] Sprint's network speeds clocked in last in every city but New York, and it wasn't even close.

Sprint's 3G network offered speeds of less than a third of AT&T's network in Chicago and Los Angeles. By far its best speed performance is in New York, where its median speed was three-quarters that of AT&T.

The carrier's response times were also quite slow, often taking nearly three times longer than Verizon to start loading content. Sprint's network lag was the greatest in all six cities.
[/quote]
yep, the response time is the biggest difference. i always had to advise against people wanting to use wifi aircards for gaming, etc. the latency is rough, but in the real world, 150ms and 30ms isnt something the consumer is going to notice what-so-ever.

did the testyou read give the model of the devices used? the best test i ever saw compared aircards, they did a speed test but also downloaded the same file from the same sites and timed them, etc.. the real world results area always closer than the speedtest results. I know when i was a data specialist at tmobile(for like two months) i helped a business rep sell some blackberries and some aircards to a company needed to transfr/download big ass PDF files for orders and products. and we sold them based on speedtest.net speed test beating out ATT or someone. and they later bitched that the speeds slowed down, like the first 30-60 seconds it was download at like 200k(back then that was hot shit) but after that is slowed to about 90k for the remainder of the download.

i doubt its that much of a change, but tmo was alll about selling data packages back then...

sprint still offers unlimited 3g and 4g aircard plans and home/business data plans to corporate liable accounts. So there is probably a lot more active data users per tower. That doesnt change the fact that each user is potentially getting a slower service, but just a likely reason as to WHY they are.

if you care enough about the 20-25% difference in data speeds, chances are you are using a fuckload of data and are going to destroy the caps the other companies have.

and lastly, sprint made a dumb mistake trying to force the wimax service. there was really no way they were going to be able to fund it successful with clearwire. so they got a head start in something that was going to fail, now they are behind, once sprint has fully launched LTE, a comparison would be more realistic as well.. the next 15-18 months are balls to the wall decommissioning nextel and flipping the switch on LTE..

im very curious to see where that leaves it all.. sprint has already announced neither the iphone 5 nor the launch of LTE will effect the unlimited data plans, its the nitch they are going to stick with..

considering wireless devices are moving towards phones making calls via the data network as well, so eventually instead of a tower running CDMA, 3G, WiMax, and LTE, it would be strictly LTE.. that would be huge... but thats probably 6-7 years away...

/rambling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1338836848' post='1133826']
Go you get your hands on this yet? I'm looking about 2 weeks or so...
[/quote]

kinda, the phone is made in a strange way, on the back yu pop the top 1/3 of the back cover off, the rest is one peice, the whole motherboard is in that area... so i can see much... havent had the balls to potentially break one yet opening it further.. i should get a return from someone in the next week and i will have at that one..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1338863161' post='1133880']
cool thanks, saw it doesnt have a removable battery, not sure if i like that or not
[/quote]

yea, thats not much of an issue TYPICALLY. but htc's batteries are by far the most common to go out, as in a customer has a phone that wont power on or charge or anything, pop in a new batt and its good to go... i assume they have a different manufacturer for the internal so i dont know whether to expect that or not.. the iphone has one, but it also has a hard button combo to "soft reset" the phone, which works everytime.

i assume the htc will as well, BUT if its the battery and not a software glitch, then its still a bricked phone..

i havent seen a single one fail yet... probably 50 sold from where i work.. so far so good..

its also funny because htc has the biggest userbase of getting retardedly huge extended batteries for their phones, making then twice as thick instead of simply adjusting their settings properly. we get the "i shouldnt have to change the way i want my phone to be just to get proper battery life" nonsense the most from evo users.. for whatever reason..

the screen on that thing is badass though.. im curious how the battery does, its 25% more capacity than the original evo was...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends on the gps chip in the SIII. the gps in the previous samsungs blows ass ever since the Moment which was early 2010, samsungs gps has been lame as hell... the device lookds great though.. tough call, but if the gps is solid, then id go Siii i think... htc is a CLOSE second though
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...