Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think you might be right. Praise gawd!

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2017/03/11/broncos-sign-domata-peko/

Quote

Broncos sign Domata Peko

Posted by Zac Jackson on March 11, 2017, 4:43 PM EST
132683231.jpg?w=250Getty Images

Longtime Bengals defensive tackle Domata Peko is signing with the Broncos, Mike Klis of News9 in Denver reported.

Peko, 32, has played his entire 11-year career in Cincinnati. He hasn’t missed a game or a start since 2009.

Klis reported that Peko will get $3.8 million guaranteed on a two-year deal that’s worth as much as $7.5 million.

Peko has 18.5 career sacks. He had a career-best five sacks in 2015 but didn’t have any last season. The Bengals are going with a youth movement, while the Broncos hope Peko can fortify their defensive front. Peko’s cousin, Kyle Peko, was a rookie nose tackle who played in one game for the Broncos last season.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FulcherVulcher33 said:

My buddy who is a big broncos fan said they have signed him thank the Lord Baby Jesus

yea losing big, talented, veteran players is a huge win...

and we all know the broncos are a joke of an organization that brings in bad players all the time...

 

fulchervulcher33 > john elways in football smarts for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GoBengals said:

yea losing big, talented, veteran players is a huge win...

and we all know the broncos are a joke of an organization that brings in bad players all the time...

 

fulchervulcher33 > john elways in football smarts for sure.

Yeah, let's not act like Peko hasnt been a very important part of this team and defense- he has been crucial to this team for many years.

 

it was time to move on, for him and the team. He now has a chance to move beyond the first round of the playoffs, and the Bengals are finally forced to play someone younger with more upside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, big_dish said:

Yeah, let's not act like Peko hasnt been a very important part of this team and defense- he has been crucial to this team for many years.

 

it was time to move on, for him and the team. He now has a chance to move beyond the first round of the playoffs, and the Bengals are finally forced to play someone younger with more upside

a team with more talent at basically every level on defense has a use for him... but you know.. "time to move on" 

 

veteran talent is running out the door in free agency..

and everyone pretends its a good thing.

the golf claps of internet gurus is actually the sound of the window slamming shut on even pretending to be a contender..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoBengals said:

a team with more talent at basically every level on defense has a use for him... but you know.. "time to move on" 

 

veteran talent is running out the door in free agency..

and everyone pretends its a good thing.

the golf claps of internet gurus is actually the sound of the window slamming shut on even pretending to be a contender..

 

You're the same guy who said that losing Bratkowski would hurt the team more than it would help them. 

 

Your football knowledge is not beyond reproach. 

 

We'll how he does in Denver. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Madieu Superstar said:

You're the same guy who said that losing Bratkowski would hurt the team more than it would help them. 

 

Your football knowledge is not beyond reproach. 

 

We'll how he does in Denver. 

awesome.... facts are fun.

Brat offense rank: 13, 10, 4, 8, 10, 32(fitz), 22, 22

NON brat offense rank: 18, 12, 6, 15, 7, 24th. 

 

Percentage of years in top 10: Bob 40%, others 33%

Highest offensive rank: Bob 4th, Others 6th.

Consecutive years top 10: BOB: 4 Others, 1

 

not to mention, this is with a garbage defense.... which means longer fields, less rest, more coming from behind. 

Defense rank for bobs team to deal with: 28th, 21st, 22nd, 17th, 24th, 19th, 6th, 24th.... thats 1 single season even in the top HALF of the league.

Since: 9th, 8th, 5th, 12th, 2nd, 8th. EVERY SINGLE YEAR top half of league and all but one year top 10....

 

just had a top 8 defense and won 6 games with it...  

bob had a #6 defense, and had jp foschi, daniel coates, lavernius coles, chad ocho fucko, henry fucking DIED, and managed to win the division, SWEPT the division(with 3 teams with winning record) and limped into the playoffs..

 

you want to give OC credit for having a great defense now? go for it... 

#reproach.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, GoBengals said:

awesome.... facts are fun.

Brat offense rank: 13, 10, 4, 8, 10, 32(fitz), 22, 22

NON brat offense rank: 18, 12, 6, 15, 7, 24th. 

 

Percentage of years in top 10: Bob 40%, others 33%

Highest offensive rank: Bob 4th, Others 6th.

Consecutive years top 10: BOB: 4 Others, 1

 

not to mention, this is with a garbage defense.... which means longer fields, less rest, more coming from behind. 

Defense rank for bobs team to deal with: 28th, 21st, 22nd, 17th, 24th, 19th, 6th, 24th.... thats 1 single season even in the top HALF of the league.

Since: 9th, 8th, 5th, 12th, 2nd, 8th. EVERY SINGLE YEAR top half of league and all but one year top 10....

 

just had a top 8 defense and won 6 games with it...  

bob had a #6 defense, and had jp foschi, daniel coates, lavernius coles, chad ocho fucko, henry fucking DIED, and managed to win the division, SWEPT the division(with 3 teams with winning record) and limped into the playoffs..

 

you want to give OC credit for having a great defense now? go for it... 

#reproach.

 

 

You're comparing an offense led by Carson Palmer (who was basically a top 5 QB when healthy) to one that has Andy Dalton (who is not a top 5 QB when healthy). 

But I do find it interesting that we somehow moved up from 22 to 18 in offense with a rookie QB, a rookie AJ Green, and two guys named Jerome Simpson and Andre Caldwell. 

I also don't understand the defense argument. Having a bad defense would mean more throwing, correct? It would also mean more time playing from behind correct? Wouldn't that usually lead to more yards, when considering a mixture of needing to make a comeback and never having the chance to play conservatively because your defense is so apt to giving up points?

 

And if Brat is so talented as an offensive mastermind, why can't he seem to hold a job after he left this country club of an organization?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rumble In the Jungle said:

I agree. Dude loves the team and the city. Not sure why he's hated on. He's one of my favorite Bengals players.

I don't hate the dude but it's plain and evident if you watch their games that he is slow and old and pretty much worthless as a dt 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...