PatternMaster Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 5 minutes ago, fredtoast said: So you are saying the claims made in that story are bullshit? Who posted that link? The link is to an old story, which is what I stated in my OP...but don't that fact get in the way of whatever it is you're doing right now. On 6/15/2017 at 10:50 AM, PatternMaster said: They had to delay valuable practice time and suffered an increased risk of injury because of wet field conditions that could be avoided. Found this lil gem on the interwebz...http://es.redskins.com/topic/335124-nfl-teams-with-indoor-practice-facilities-averaged-4-more-wins-in-2010/ It's old but has some valuable info, imo. The fact that 13 of the 14 SEC teams have one and a professional team doesn't, especially when they play in a city where it's a high potential for adverse weather for almost half of the season, is a bit silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted June 16, 2017 Report Share Posted June 16, 2017 57 minutes ago, fredtoast said: You fail at logic. This story is trying to claim that having a practice facility (A) means more wins (B). I can disprove that claim (if A then B) with out proving the inverse (If not A then B). I can prove this statement as false (If it is a dog then it is a lizzard) without proving this statement (If it is not a dog then it is a lizzard) Understand now? You fail at humor. I blame that omgdrdoom guy, he starts talking about "logic" all the time and now everyone's running around here in togas with this "if the subset of not x is defined by b where x" >= the height of my pile of bullshit"... We're talking about a practice field for a football team FFS. Nobody is being graded on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted June 17, 2017 Report Share Posted June 17, 2017 Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.