Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
High School Harry

Bring the Fullback BacK!!

Recommended Posts

Ryan Hewitt hasn’t been very involved after signing a contract extension with the Bengals prior to the 2016 season, but he hopes that changes with Bill Lazor overhauling the offense.

By PatrickJudis@PatrickJudis  Jun 8, 2018, 7:00am EDT
 

usa_today_10206319.0.jpgKareem Elgazzar-USA TODAY Sports

The Bengals gave Ryan Hewitt a contract extension in 2016 to keep him in stripes until after the 2019 season. At the time, it seemed like a great deal. With Hue Jackson running the show, Hewitt was able to show his value as a blocker as well as in the passing game by catching 18 passes his first two seasons.

Since Hewitt signed the deal, though, he has seen his dramatic cut to his playing time as well as production. He has only caught four passes the past two seasons while barely playing 15 percent of the available snaps.

“I obviously have high expectations for myself and I’m a competitor, so I want to play as much as possible, but again, you can only do what is scripted for you and what you’re involved in,” Hewitt told Jim Owczarski and Paul Dehner Jr. of the Cincinnati Enquirer. “I’m not one to go make a big deal about that. I’m going to do what I’m told. But again, I want to play as much as possible.

“I re-signed and for a second I was thinking, hey, I might even get more involved, and it seemed like I went on the decline playing-time wise. It’s nice to potentially be really involved, back in playing and get some time and hopefully make some plays and get back to what I’m used to doing.”

It is unfortunate to see a guy like Hewitt who just wants to go out and prove his worth be given so little opportunity. Obviously, Ken Zampese didn’t have much of a plan to use Hewitt like Jackson did. It is even more surprising when you think how Zampese didn’t have as much talent to work onto the field in 2016 with the loss of Marvin Jones and Mohamed Sanu plus the injuries of Tyler Eifert and A.J. Green. It seems the Bengals new offensive coordinator Bill Lazor is excited about the idea of changing all that though.

“The fullback is a lost art to some degree. We just made an emphasis from the first day of practice to have some fullback involved every day,” Lazor said. “I think when you’re in that position you have to be able to have some versatility, and Ryan has proven that he can play tight end. Sometimes you have fullbacks who can double as halfbacks. He can double as a tight end. Not a halfback yet. I feel good about him. He’s a smart guy. He’s a tough guy. In practice, you can see if you put him in all those roles he doesn’t blink.”

It sounds like a bit of good and bad news for Hewitt with those comments. On one hand it shows that Lazor is open to the idea of having a fullback. That at least gives him a shot at the roster. It seem like Hewitt has some work to do to make that happen though. Adding that running back depth could be between what sees him have a larger role next season and possibly not making the roster altogether.

It is interesting that Lazor wants Hewitt to be able to double as a tight end. It makes sense though as it adds depth to the roster as well as opens up opportunities to move him around before the snap. The more the defense has to decipher the better. Hewitt could be one of those guys who you don’t know where he will end up once the huddle breaks.

“You watch what a lot of the players who played my position for his offenses, they’re very multiple-skilled guys who aren’t one-faceted blockers or route runners,” Hewitt said. “He kind of likes guys who can do it all, so that’s what I’m hoping I can bring to the table. Obviously I’m a little more run savvy, but I like to get out and catch the ball and do that thing, too. Hopefully I’m able to get some of that done this year.”

It seems that Hewitt understands the situation he is in, and it is motivating him to get to that level of play that gets him on the field more. If he succeeds then the Bengals will be a better team for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was essentially benched in favor of Burkhead, IIRC from looking at the snap counts etc.  Obviously that's more of a scheme thing than a straight up substitution, but it's another example of our offense trying to smoke & mirrors their way out of being soft on the OL.  Or in general.

 

I still say 50% or more of Hill's problem was not having Hewitt leading the way for him.  Dude didn't just turn to shit for fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, T-Dub said:

He was essentially benched in favor of Burkhead, IIRC from looking at the snap counts etc.  Obviously that's more of a scheme thing than a straight up substitution, but it's another example of our offense trying to smoke & mirrors their way out of being soft on the OL.  Or in general.

 

I still say 50% or more of Hill's problem was not having Hewitt leading the way for him.  Dude didn't just turn to shit for fun.

Between not using Hewitt and the oline declining it easy to understand how Hill went from a 1,000 yard back to a guy who could barely get 3 ypc. 

 

If the Bengals are serious about running the ball then Hewitt has to be involved in the game plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PatternMaster said:

Between not using Hewitt and the oline declining it easy to understand how Hill went from a 1,000 yard back to a guy who could barely get 3 ypc. 

 

If the Bengals are serious about running the ball then Hewitt has to be involved in the game plan.

I’m not sure it’s that cut and dry. Mixon ran out of shotgun in college. He also ran better out of shotgun last season as opposed to when the QB was under center. 

Many prefeence would be to play to his strengths. I think he’s the best player on offense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah. We're WAY better off running behind a FB. whether it's Joe or Gio. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Bunghole said:

Nah. We're WAY better off running behind a FB. whether it's Joe or Gio. 

I’m just saying, last year Mixon ran for 4.2 ypc in shotgun and 3.1 ypc under center.

 

Gio ran for 5.3 ypc in shotgun and 2.9 ypc under center. 

 

I could be wrong, but I also don’t remember Dallas or Chip Kelly utilizing a fullback much in their offense, 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mixon would have to slow down and not only wait for the offensive line to block but wait for the fullback to bock, too, before getting it in high gear. Mixon would waste his speed and allow defensive players from the other side to get involved in the play. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Rick said:

Mixon would have to slow down and not only wait for the offensive line to block but wait for the fullback to bock, too, before getting it in high gear. Mixon would waste his speed and allow defensive players from the other side to get involved in the play. 

His runny style is identical to Bell. They sit behind the line and wait for a hole to evolve. I’m just not sure that style needs a fullback. What would be the point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Madieu Superstar said:

His runny style is identical to Bell. They sit behind the line and wait for a home to evolve. I’m just not sure that style needs a fullback. What would be the point?

Good point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Go-Bengals.com on Facebook

Go-Bengals.com on Twitter

×