Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I reply yeah we'll trade ya Dalton for Tannehill and a 2nd.

 

He replied back  I hate Dalton Tannehill is much better.

 

I reply   I'd take Driskel over both of um.

 

end of conversation

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Driskel is horrible, he can barely hit the broadside of a aircraft carrier.....he has no clue where the ball is going when it leaves his hand.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

when I saw who started the thread I was wondering why we would want Tannehill when we have the all mighty Driskel

 

I think this is a photo of their conversation about the three QB's.

 

 

Harry-and-Lloyd-2.jpg

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tannehill is better than Dalton.  If he ever had an O line and AJ as his #1 receiver he would be quite a bit better. Doesn’t mean he is great. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SF2 said:

Tannehill is better than Dalton.  If he ever had an O line and AJ as his #1 receiver he would be quite a bit better. Doesn’t mean he is great. 

Has Meow left the building?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, fluhartz said:

when I saw who started the thread I was wondering why we would want Tannehill when we have the all mighty Driskel

 

I think this is a photo of their conversation about the three QB's.

 

 

Harry-and-Lloyd-2.jpg

Lmao!!!

 

Naw I'll admit Driskel sucked it up.  But I don't like tannehill at all.  I'd rather roll with Dalton this season than tannehill.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Catfish Bob said:

Lmao!!!

 

Naw I'll admit Driskel sucked it up.  But I don't like tannehill at all.  I'd rather roll with Dalton this season than tannehill.  

He is better IMHO but not so much that we would give much up to get him. If we were to make this kind of move now would be the time to do it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SF2 said:

He is better IMHO but not so much that we would give much up to get him. If we were to make this kind of move now would be the time to do it.

 Both are high risks to rely on for a full season. 

I'd like too see some younger whipper snappers get a shot and keep Dalton over trading anything more than a 3rd for tannehil. 

I think it's safe to say MB ain't trading chit for now. Dolphin fans your stuck with tannehill. Too many good QBs out there and more coming in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if Tannehill is a tick better theoretically (he certainly hasn't demonstrated it) the difference is too marginal to give up anything in a trade. 

 

If we want a significant upgrade at QB it's going to be a draft pick, and it would be foolish to invest heavily in QB with this scrub OL to protect them.  No reason to throw a promising rookie to the wolves like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, T-Dub said:

Even if Tannehill is a tick better theoretically (he certainly hasn't demonstrated it) the difference is too marginal to give up anything in a trade. 

And he hasn't played a full season since 2015. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Cat said:

And he hasn't played a full season since 2015. 

 

Oh well in that case we should sign him up! We love guys that haven't been productive since 2015.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, T-Dub said:

 

Oh well in that case we should sign him up! We love guys that haven't been productive since 2015.

Eifert will be happy! They can chill on IR together.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cat said:

Eifert will be happy! They can chill on IR together.

 

 Frankenstein together pieces of him, Tannehill, Glenn, Burfict..  We'd have a great football player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/19/2019 at 12:24 PM, whodey? said:

We got Dead Eye Driskel. We don’t need anything else. 

If his eye is indeed dead it could explain his accuracy issues (poor depth perception).

 

😊

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Driskel didn't have a full complement of weaponry (Green, etc) at his disposal, and I think that coupled with super conservative playcalls and probably his own nerves sunk him. I think he's better than he's shown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, snarkster said:

If his eye is indeed dead it could explain his accuracy issues (poor depth perception).

 

😊

:24: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Go-Bengals.com on Facebook

Go-Bengals.com on Twitter

×