T-Dub Posted May 3 Report Share Posted May 3 2 hours ago, sparky151 said: That production was almost all Hurst. Irv Smith is effectively Hurst's replacement. The rest of the league thinks Hurst is a much better player than Smith Which is odd since Smith projected to have better numbers if he didn't miss 8 games. I definitely liked Hurst's attitude & such but his production really wasn't anything extraordinary. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted May 3 Report Share Posted May 3 1 hour ago, PatternMaster said: Well I guess we will never know because the Bengals chose not to draft him in the first round, they obviously like the guys on the roster as they didn't draft a TE throughout the entire draft. Yes, agreed they drafted players they liked. And it was a mistake to not draft a TE in favor of depth players at other positions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BBR Posted May 3 Report Share Posted May 3 3 hours ago, sparky151 said: That production was almost all Hurst. Irv Smith is effectively Hurst's replacement. The rest of the league thinks Hurst is a much better player than Smith so it's no sure thing the current TE group hits even those totals. I would have bet a rookie Mike Mayer would match the yard and TD totals by himself. Was this the consensus before, or after Hurst played for the Bengals? Will Irv Smith see a similar rise in value after having Burrow toss him the ball? I wouldn't say that Hurst has really been all that impressive throughout his career: YEAR TEAM G REC YDS AVG LNG TD 1st 1st% 20+ 40+ TOTAL 70 177 1718 9.7 61 14 95 53.7 17 2 2022 Cincinnati Bengals 13 52 414 8 29 2 25 48.1 4 0 2021 Atlanta Falcons 13 26 221 8.5 33 3 11 42.3 1 0 2020 Atlanta Falcons 16 56 571 10.2 42 6 35 62.5 5 1 2019 Baltimore Ravens 16 30 349 11.6 61 2 16 53.3 4 1 2018 Baltimore Ravens 12 13 163 12.5 32 1 8 61.5 3 0 Here's Irv Smith's stats for comparison: YEAR TEAM G REC YDS AVG LNG TD 1st 1st% 20+ 40+ TOTAL 37 91 858 9.4 36 9 48 52.7 11 0 2022 Minnesota Vikings 8 25 182 7.3 17 2 9 36 0 0 2020 Minnesota Vikings 13 30 365 12.2 36 5 22 73.3 6 0 2019 Minnesota Vikings 16 36 311 8.6 29 2 17 47.2 5 0 Oddly enough, their NFL draft prospect grades are both 6.40 (not that this means much at all). https://www.nfl.com/prospects/hayden-hurst/32004855-5249-5014-7c57-e10d2c41fe87 https://www.nfl.com/prospects/irv-smith/3200534d-4900-0018-f675-8c060d792d35 If you put an stock into those NFL draft prospect grades at all, then there were only 3 TEs this year that are rated higher than Irv Smith: Luke Musgrave OREGON STATE Rnd 2, Pick 11 TE Green Bay Packers Senior 6.49 Dalton Kincaid UTAH Rnd 1, Pick 25 TE Buffalo Bills Senior 6.48 Michael Mayer NOTRE DAME Rnd 2, Pick 4 TE Las Vegas Raiders Junior 6.44 It will be interesting to see how those 3 dudes perform. Anyways, I'm just not sure I agree with the idea that Hurst is considered a "much better player" rather than an equivalent player(prior to joining the Bengals). Hurst is just benefitting from the offense he left and people are not giving Irv Smith the benefit of a doubt for the offense he's joining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted May 3 Report Share Posted May 3 Rankings as draft prospects don't mean much for veteran free agents. Hurst's best season was 2020 in Atlanta before they drafted Pitts. But even last year he had more yards than any season Smith has had. Smith was drafted in the 2nd round to replace Kyle Rudolph but didn't live up to his draft status. Vikings traded for Hockenson last year and didn't bring Smith back as even the backup. Both were free agents this year and Hurst's AAV is about 4 times Smith's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.