9 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

We will have an election. What that looks like with all the gerrymandering going on remains to be seen.

The idea of canceling the election would cause a uproar even among MAGA, (maybe not the most loyal), but even if they we're quiet Trump won less than 50% of the people who actually voted. In fact more people didn't vote than did. Between Trump, Harris, and eligible to vote but did not Trump only got 39.63% percent of the vote. If he canceled elections Between the MAGA that would be bothered by it, Harris voters, and the people who didn't vote (but would at least care if there was no election) you'd have to think there would be consequences

doesnt need to cancel them if they disenfranchise enough people & put ICE at all the urban polling locations to scare away anyone that's left. then there's elon & his "computers", got an ex saying they rigged shit, piles of trump ballots with not a single other vote for anything or anyone else.. IDK how we're supposed to trust people that accused everyone else of cheating & then repeatedly bragged about cheating? i'm crazy to think maybe they cheated?

but sure, some kind of election will happen and they will probably "win" by a landslide, 127% of the vote, never seen before, fantastic, yuge...

we have to try but i suspect the last election was it.. this is the consequences part.

12 hours ago, T-Dub said:

doesnt need to cancel them if they disenfranchise enough people & put ICE at all the urban polling locations to scare away anyone that's left. then there's elon & his "computers", got an ex saying they rigged shit, piles of trump ballots with not a single other vote for anything or anyone else.. IDK how we're supposed to trust people that accused everyone else of cheating & then repeatedly bragged about cheating? i'm crazy to think maybe they cheated?

but sure, some kind of election will happen and they will probably "win" by a landslide, 127% of the vote, never seen before, fantastic, yuge...

we have to try but i suspect the last election was it.. this is the consequences part.

I feel the same way about ICE at the polling stations; people won't put up with that shit. His fanbase might, but most Americans won't. As far as the Elon thing, I really need to see some proof of this, not just his ex's word. It just seems like this is the other side whining about the thing that the MAGA folks whined about when Biden got elected. Show me some actual proof of this so that we don't look like we are just the opposite side of that coin.

The only thing that worries me is turnout and gerrymandering

1 hour ago, Jamie_B said:

I feel the same way about ICE at the polling stations; people won't put up with that shit.

People are putting up with kidnapping, a nationwide system of death camps, and executions in the street right now, and have been for months - what makes you think voter intimidation at the polls will be a red line?

1 hour ago, Jamie_B said:

As far as the Elon thing, I really need to see some proof of this, not just his ex's word. It just seems like this is the other side whining about the thing that the MAGA folks whined about when Biden got elected. Show me some actual proof of this so that we don't look like we are just the opposite side of that coin.

The only thing that worries me is turnout and gerrymandering

That's their entire strategy - accuse the opposition of whatever crime they are committing then claim "both sides do it!" when they get caught. They've managed to normalize every kind of corruption. Even sex trafficking of children - the "Pizzagate" bullshit was all about discrediting the Epstein story.

Anyway this was the first lawsuit but of course the Dems don't want to talk about it. No, their stance is they just need a few more millions in AIPAC money and they will win next time and fix everything, surely.

https://www.newsweek.com/2024-election-lawsuit-advances-2083391

You don't think it's at all suspicious that a candidate that lost the previous election & committed treason about it somehow won every single swing state? Not even a little bit?

3 minutes ago, T-Dub said:

People are putting up with kidnapping, a nationwide system of death camps, and executions in the street right now, and have been for months - what makes you think voter intimidation at the polls will be a red line?

That's their entire strategy - accuse the opposition of whatever crime they are committing then claim "both sides do it!" when they get caught. They've managed to normalize every kind of corruption. Even sex trafficking of children - the "Pizzagate" bullshit was all about discrediting the Epstein story.

Anyway this was the first lawsuit but of course the Dems don't want to talk about it. No, their stance is they just need a few more millions in AIPAC money and they will win next time and fix everything, surely.

https://www.newsweek.com/2024-election-lawsuit-advances-2083391

You don't think it's at all suspicious that a candidate that lost the previous election & committed treason about it somehow won every single swing state? Not even a little bit?

People putting up with that stuff is more likely that most aren't paying attention. You put ICE at polling stations and people will be forced to pay attention.

I fully get that they accuse the other side of things they are doing, but the cheating at the election stuff isnt something that is easy to do, I'd like to see some concrete evidence of it, not just accusations. If that turns up and the courts agree it happened, then by all means throw the book at them, but I want to know HOW they did that because we can't say when they accuse us of cheating how difficult it would be to do that then explain all the ways that make it difficult, that oh now its not difficult? When did it being difficult change and how? I want to see details, because Fox News had to pay some big-time lawsuits over accusations like that.

23 minutes ago, Jamie_B said:

People putting up with that stuff is more likely that most aren't paying attention. You put ICE at polling stations and people will be forced to pay attention.

I fully get that they accuse the other side of things they are doing, but the cheating at the election stuff isnt something that is easy to do, I'd like to see some concrete evidence of it, not just accusations. If that turns up and the courts agree it happened, then by all means throw the book at them, but I want to know HOW they did that because we can't say when they accuse us of cheating how difficult it would be to do that then explain all the ways that make it difficult, that oh now its not difficult? When did it being difficult change and how? I want to see details, because Fox News had to pay some big-time lawsuits over accusations like that.

See the Newsweek link above.

Also worth noting, again, Donny the Diddler made comments about "not needing votes" & Muskrat "knowing the big beautiful computers" etc etc.

So if they didn't rig anything, they seem to want people to think they did. Considering about why they'd want that, I'm not sure which is worse.

Trash jackass on the lawn of the White House disparaging Michelle Obama. I canceled my Paramount Plus, the firing of Colbert, the hiring of Berry Weiss and firing of good reporters at 60 Minutes, this was the final straw. They will have to do alot for them to ever get my money again.

9 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

Trash jackass on the lawn of the White House disparaging Michelle Obama. I canceled my Paramount Plus, the firing of Colbert, the hiring of Berry Weiss and firing of good reporters at 60 Minutes, this was the final straw. They will have to do alot for them to ever get my money again.

well tbf.. she's more of a man than this brain-damaged steroid lump whose only claim to fame will be disparaging a black woman that's actually done something meaningful with her life, just so he could suck up to a child-raping despot.

let's stop making stupid people famous

7 hours ago, T-Dub said:

well tbf.. she's more of a man than this brain-damaged steroid lump whose only claim to fame will be disparaging a black woman that's actually done something meaningful with her life, just so he could suck up to a child-raping despot.

let's stop making stupid people famous

Its wild what they think a man is on that side.

It's giving small dick enegery.

4 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

Its wild what they think a man is on that side.

It's giving small dick enegery.

the whole MAGA movement is about centering & protecting the fragile emotions of the most mediocre & comically insecure white men.

everyone else is laughing at them, constantly..

including women, which is why so many of them prefer assaulting children instead.