April 21Apr 21 comment_1825822 This is big news and deserves it's own thread.The Bengals have finally given up their stubbornness on allowing single digit defensive numbers. Everything is changing in the Nati it seems. Report
April 21Apr 21 Author comment_1825827 It probably was as was Cook's #6 when he signed. The Bengals old policy was foolish as young guys take their #'s and 'aura branding' very seriously. Report
April 21Apr 21 Author comment_1825829 I wish they had given Stewart his college #4, but perhaps although they are allowing the single digits, they still want you to "earn" it (DJ & Cook have). Report
April 22Apr 22 comment_1825875 6 hours ago, BlackJesus said:I wish they had given Stewart his college #4, but perhaps although they are allowing the single digits, they still want you to "earn" it (DJ & Cook have).They thought it was inappropriate to constantly remind him of how many tackles he made last year. Report
April 22Apr 22 comment_1825882 8 hours ago, BlackJesus said:I wish they had given Stewart his college #4, but perhaps although they are allowing the single digits, they still want you to "earn" it (DJ & Cook have).Hey that's the same # of sacks he had during his entire college career if I recall? Rounding up, that is. Report
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.