I_C_Deadpeople
-
Posts
4,650 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Pickems
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by I_C_Deadpeople
-
-
I will post this article from The Athletic, but not sure how the format will display, revised consensus top 100:
2024 NFL Draft Consensus BoardPLAYER POSITION SCHOOL LAST CHANGE 1Marvin Harrison Jr.WR212Caleb WilliamsQB1-13Drake MayeQB304Malik NabersWR845Rome OdunzeWR616Brock BowersTE4-27Joe AltOT5-28Dallas TurnerEDGE919Jayden DanielsQB10110Jared VerseEDGE11111Olu FashanuOT7-412JC LathamOT12013Terrion ArnoldCB15214Taliese FuagaG/T14015Quinyon MitchellCB16116Laiatu LatuEDGE13-317Troy FautanuG/T25818Byron Murphy IIDT19119Amarius MimsOT18-120Brian Thomas Jr.WR21121Nate WigginsCB17-422J.J. McCarthyQB26423Jer'Zhan NewtonDT23024Tyler GuytonOT24025Cooper DeJeanCB20-526Chop RobinsonEDGE28227Graham BartonOL32528Kool-Aid McKinstryCB22-629Adonai MitchellWR33430Jackson Powers-JohnsonC29-131Ladd McConkeyWR36532Darius RobinsonEdge431133Bo NixQB30-334Jordan MorganG/T35135Ennis Rakestraw Jr.CB31-436Troy FranklinWR34-237Kamari LassiterCB37038Keon ColemanWR27-1139Edgerrin CooperLB40140Xavier WorthyWR39-141Payton WilsonLB511042Braden FiskeDT864443Tyler NubinS47444Zach FrazierC/G45145Michael Penix Jr.QB38-746Roman WilsonWR47147T'Vondre SweatDT611448Chris BraswellEDGE42-649Ricky PearsallWR782950Junior ColsonLB631351Jonathon BrooksRB60952Kris Jenkins Jr.DT50-253Kingsley SuamataiaOT44-954Javon BullardS52-255Ja'Tavion SandersTE41-1456Malachi CorleyWR62657T.J. TampaCB55-258Xavier LegetteWR59159Marshawn KneelandEDGE711260Adisa IsaacEDGE58-261Bralen TriceEDGE48-1362Christian HaynesG771563Cooper BeebeIOL66364Jermaine BurtonWR69565Kiran AmegadjieOT72766Patrick PaulOT56-1067Mike SainristilCB68168Devontez WalkerWR49-1969Ruke OrhorhoroDT76770Jaden HicksS64-671Ja'Lynn PolkWR53-1872Jeremiah Trotter Jr.LB65-773Calen BullockS57-1674Max MeltonCBNRNR75Blake CorumRB75076Kamren KinchensS54-2277Brandon DorlusDT74-378Michael Hall Jr.DT73-579Jonah EllissEDGE67-1280Jaylen WrightRBNRNR81Blake FisherOT85482Jalen McMillanWR81-183Austin BookerEDGENRNR84Javon BakerWRNRNR85Trey BensonRB84-186Dominick PuniG87187Maason SmithDT88188Cole BishopS96889Cade StoverTENRNR90Andru PhillipsCBNRNR91Kris Abrams-DraineCB82-992D.J. JamesCBNRNR93Zak ZinterG99694Renardo GreenCBNRNR95Cedric GrayLB90-596Sedrick Van PranC83-1397Theo JohnsonTENRNR98Cam HartCB94-499Braelon AllenRB80-19100Spencer RattlerQBNRNR -
31 minutes ago, Griever said:
Such a great OT class, many options
I am confident we will fine the worst.. I mean best one!!
-
1
-
-
56 minutes ago, JC said:
His issue - he has had some serious injuries
-
Mock I did, no trades and Mims was also available at 18.
-
1
-
-
Just now, BlackJesus said:
I wouldn't even trade him to Baltimore for their 1st Rd pick. As it's never a good idea to make a division rival better.
The only way I would even consider trading him to the Ravens would be for like 3 first Rd picks. Something that might cripple their future regardless of how good he was.
I would tell them "all your picks in 2024 and 2025", otherwise f*ck off.
-
1
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, Jamie_B said:
I don't know why they even called, they should know the Bengals arent going to trade in division.
They had phoned earlier and asked "is your refigerator running"
-
1
-
-
17 minutes ago, spicoli said:
The Bengals absolutely will not reach to fill a need. That is guaranteed.Agreed. That is the only guarantee of the drfat. Oh wait, other than we will not select at QB anywhere near the top....2 guarantees. Amongst the gaurantees are.....nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition...
-
2
-
-
19 minutes ago, SF2 said:
I dunno. There isn’t much history of a QB literally being given away or cut by 2 decent organizations then having a Renaissance and becoming good. Wilson is just weird and he has never been a great QB.
Fields has been terrible in Chicago. Sure, you can blame the organization to some extent but he really likes throwing the ball to the wrong colored jersey. If you can’t do it by year 3 you simply can’t do it.
I don’t see how taking on 2 marginal and cheap QBs can be a great move. You are basically giving up on yet another season.
Maybe I should have said a good move for us? LOL.
I see these as good moves in the sense that they quickly recognized Pickett Mittens was not going to cut it so these moves are transitioanl to keep them 'competitive' or seen as such. Wilson is a head case but so was Jen and too many other Stealers to count. Fields is a cheap back-up shot in the dark type at this point.
The problem for almost all teams in the AFC is theysee thier QB's compared to Mahomes, Burrow, Allen and it is bad enough with one of those types in the conference let alone 3.
-
2
-
-
I would not be surprised if we pick Troy Fautanu at 18. He can play all 5 spots on the OL and could probably start at RT.
-
1
-
-
35 minutes ago, Griever said:
Classic
-
I would suspect they would be offerring Becton a marginal/reasonable base salasry with bonuses available for snap counts or games started. He is , at this point, a backup and even if we sign him, there is a fiar chance that a RT we drafted in iether R1 or R2 could outplay him.
Still early in the post season here, what date did we pick up Brown last year?
-
1 minute ago, New Jersey Bengal said:
And fields is a free agent next year so they'll have to pay him or he's gone
Excellent point. I did not know that. I guess they will have a QB competition and see which one the want to roll with for the next few years.
-
Hate the Stealers as much as anyone but I have to say these were 2 good moves. Wilson is probably done but they are paying him nothing and as much as he is a locker room shithead, the Stoolers seem to actually like that.
Fields is better than Pickett and I will give the Stoolers credit for realizing what most knew, Pickett was never going to develop. So they cut thier losses.
neither of these guys or Burrow or Lamar obviously but they will keep the Stoolers in the mix.
-
1
-
-
16 minutes ago, New Jersey Bengal said:
I always liked Nixon wish him we'll just not against us lol
Nixon was pretty good until Watergate
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, sparky151 said:
The NFL has the "funding rule" which requires guaranteed future payments to be put in escrow. It's an obsolete relic from the days when teams folded with players not getting paid. But it hasn't been needed since the depression.
Florio checked on it last year to see how much the Browns had put in escrow for Watson. It turned out the answer was zero. It's a league rule, not in the CBA but the owners like having it around so some of them can plead cash flow problems. But it's no longer necessary and doesn't seem to be enforced anyway.
Zero for the idiot Watson? wow, did not know that. I suppose one could argue each contract is essentially secured by the NFL so no need for escrow.
Appreciate your insight on this.
-
Need to also add college carries, those vary greatly by player as well.
-
1 hour ago, BlackJesus said:
Donald ruined what could have been the best day of my life. Fuck him. I hope he suffers from anal warts for the rest of his life. 😡
Technically, the clown who tried to block him ruined your day...
Darnold was a beast
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, snarkster said:
From what I've seen there is a grand total of four guys in the draft who could remotely be considered a NT:
Sweat (Texas) Rd 2-3
McKinley (Miss St) Rd 3-4
Jefferson (LSU) Rd 5-6
Anderson (FAU) Rd 6-FA
Am I missing anyone?
Justin Rogers (Auburn) 6-3 346 lbs
Evan Anderson (FAU) - 6-3 356 lbs
-
2 hours ago, JC said:
If they franchise him again next year I think I’ll rip my hair out. If you are going to guarantee two years in full - why not do it now and get an extra two years of control.
I think it’s certainly possible. But it will be frustrating and probably a signal that things are changing as much as we would hope or they’re cash poor.
They are not cash poor. The league allows each team to have a line of credit up to 50% of the franchise value; now some owners may be over leveraged in other ways and can't access this but the Brown family would have little to no debt. Having said that - the USE of a line of credit today, to be repaid in the future has not really been part of thier make-up. But we have now given several contracts though with large guarantees (and I believe these amounts have to be put in escrow) which no doubt has moved us into the line of credit mode. Up front money and guarantees are now 'normal' practice for contracts so we have no choice but to adjust.
For Tee, he may want say $50M up front/guaranteed which means $50M out the door today compared to say $45M - $50M spread out over the next two years if they double tag him. It is a big difference.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, MichaelWeston said:
Vikings add another first rounder. Trying to collect picks to move up to get a QB I think.
This is an interesting trade since it even involves a 2025 pick:
Per multiple reports, Minnesota has acquired the No. 23 overall pick and No. 232 in the seventh round. In exchange, Houston has received No. 42 in the second round, No. 188 in the sixth round, and a second-round pick in 2025.
That gives the Vikings two first-round selections in this year’s draft, as they also have their original No. 11 overall pick after finishing the season 7-10.
The pick at No. 23 is originally from the Browns, who sent the selection to the Texans as part of the deal for quarterback Deshaun Watson.
By making this trade in mid-March, the Vikings have some options before the draft. They could potentially package No. 11 and No. 23 to move up into the top 10 for a quarterback. Or if that’s not enough, they could package No. 11 and No. 23 with a player — perhaps receiver Justin Jefferson, who is seeking a new contract — to move up for the quarterback they want.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, spicoli said:
PunterI think Bowers will fall to the last round so we may pick him up 😎
-
48 minutes ago, esjbh2 said:
Well well, for a 7th round pick, #224 is pretty good all things considered...it's the FOURTH pick of the 7th round...I previously assumed it was Houston's pick at #247.
I guess then when it was initially a conditional 7th rounder it was conditional on Mixon signing an extension?
-
1
-
-
41 minutes ago, sparky151 said:
He is an unrestricted free agent who got the non-exclusive tag. The Bengals could have prevented him from negotiating with other teams via the exclusive franchise tag but it costs more. It's only rarely used, I think the last time was Drew Brees.
Hmm..I did not know there were two different kind of franchise tags.
-
Tee is not a FA, he has been designated with the tag.
-
1
-
Free Agency 2024
in THE BENGALS FORUM - For Bengals Fans *Only*
Posted
And not just the best 5, we need some usefull depth. The Fords and Cartmans of the world are not exactly bench strength