1408

[Actium]

[quote name='Montana Bengal' post='503665' date='Jun 24 2007, 10:07 AM']For the most part I think you are right about Cusack, but Must Love Dogs was not good and the casting was screwy for it.

1804 was pretty good throughout most of the movie, but I wouldn't say it was great. I was on my seat most of the movie, but I kind of felt like it drifted a little bit towards the end. But, that said, I'd recommend it as one of the better movies I've seen lately.[/quote]

I just saw it last night (Transformers was sold out) and I agree with this assessment. It was a solid film--not revolutionary, but a good flick. The directing was superb and Cusak dominated. Funny moments and effective psychological chills. A little silly at times and frays at the end (as Amen said that's what King does) but I would recommend it highly (considering the drek Hollywood usually puts out of late).

[Actium]

[quote name='A-Men-HouseofPain' post='504141' date='Jun 25 2007, 03:46 PM']A popular theory that im hearing is Dr. Gordon. There were a few traps/games set up in saw 2 and 3 that would require someone with some surgery experience to set them up and we have yet to hear from or see a dead Dr. Gordon yet.

The only thing i do know is the opening scene is going to be one of the nastiest scenes EVER in a movie.
AND ACCORDING TO THIS INTERVIEW [url="http://movies.ign.com/articles/798/798800p2.html"]http://movies.ign.com/articles/798/798800p2.html[/url] : SAW V and VI are confirmed as well Ive got the biggest wood ever right now, i think i could cut butter
Here is a photo from Saw IV

[img]http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x124/Hurmoth/saw4clip061907.jpg[/img][/quote]

Blah, Saw is a would-be snuff film for dilettantes. If you want, I can get you a real one--just describe how you want the victim to look, and how you want him/her to die....