Jump to content

NFLPA tweet

Featured Replies

comment_1699429

Will look into this a bit deeper…Ohio Workers Comp is one area of our organizational interests. 
 

On the surface, unsure if statute distinguishes between “mainstream” and “special” business; but there are different classifications of “workplace injury” exposures—each charge the employers a different rate. 
 

Also, Ohio is a “sole remedy” state—and Work Comp is that sole remedy. The state handles it all for work-related injury. 
 

https://www.wcpo.com/sports/football/bengals/nflpa-bengals-ownership-is-attempting-to-strip-workers-compensation-benefits-from-ohio-athletes

comment_1699430

Kind of a 30,000 ft overview—and it doesn’t really delve into Ohio exceptions—but does illustrate that this question goes far beyond what the Bengals are wishing to do: 

 

https://www.iwpharmacy.com/blog/professional-athletes-and-workers-compensation-eligibility

 

And this one comes from lawyers’ POV…more instructional than anything. But it does get to the apparent central theme that the NFLPA is bloviating over… that of “permanent” or “permanent partial” disability…a big ticket money item 

 

https://www.lawyer-monthly.com/2021/04/are-professional-athletes-entitled-to-workers-compensation/

 

  • Author
comment_1699431
1 minute ago, Le Tigre said:

Kind of a 30,000 ft overview—and it doesn’t really delve into Ohio exceptions—but does illustrate that this question goes far beyond what the Bengals are wishing to do: 

 

https://www.iwpharmacy.com/blog/professional-athletes-and-workers-compensation-eligibility

 

Thanks!

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Background Picker
Customize Layout