Jump to content

Reds 2023..


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Jamie_B said:

Mets lose

 

2.5 down to Chi and Mia who are tied. We have 3 against St Louis 

 

Lose one and were out if it's Miami, and hoping for a tie with Chi

 

Lose 2 and were eliminated by both

Still a chance..

Bell said he'll start

Williamson 

Phillips

Greene..

 

I'm good with that.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the scenarios. 

 

4-way tie scenario (for 2 spots)

Scenario: D-backs, Cubs, Marlins, Reds tie
Result: Marlins and Reds IN; D-backs and Cubs OUT

There are four teams vying for the remaining two NL Wild Card spots. The second Wild Card spot would go to the team with the best winning percentage against the other tied clubs. That is the Marlins at .611, better than the D-backs (.550), Reds (.538) and Cubs (.346).

The third Wild Card would then go to the Reds because they own a winning record against the Cubs (7-6) and D-backs (4-3).

 

4-way tie scenario (for 1 spot)

Scenario: Cubs, Marlins, Reds, Padres tie
Result: Padres IN; Cubs, Marlins and Reds OUT

Since none of these teams have a winning record against each of the tied clubs, the tiebreaker here is based on winning percentage against the tied clubs. In this scenario, the Padres make the playoffs as their .579 winning percentage against the group is better than the Marlins' (.542), the Reds' (.531) and the Cubs' (.394).

 

3-way tie scenarios (for 1 spot)

Scenario: Marlins claim the 2nd Wild Card; D-backs, Cubs, Reds tie
Result: Reds IN; D-backs and Cubs OUT

The Reds would claim the third Wild Card because they own a winning record against the Cubs (7-6) and D-backs (4-3).

Scenario: D-backs claim 2nd Wild Card; Cubs, Marlins, Reds tie
Result: Marlins IN; Cubs and Reds OUT

Although the Marlins and Reds each won their season series vs. the Cubs, they split their six head-to-head games, meaning the third Wild Card would go to the team with the best winning percentage against the other two tied clubs. In this scenario, the Marlins would claim the third Wild Card because their .583 winning percentage against the tied clubs is better than the Reds’ (.526) and Cubs’ (.421).

Scenario: Cubs claim 2nd Wild Card; D-backs, Marlins, Reds tie
Result: Marlins IN; D-backs and Reds OUT

Since the Marlins and Reds went 3-3 in their season series, we must again consider head-to-head winning percentages to determine who grabs the third Wild Card spot. In this scenario, the Marlins (.583) make the postseason over the Reds (.538) and D-backs (.385).

Scenario: Cubs, Marlins, Padres tie
Result: Padres IN; Cubs and Marlins OUT

The third Wild Card would go to the Padres in this scenario since their winning percentage against the other two tied clubs (.538) is better than the Marlins' (.500) and the Cubs' (.462).

 

3-way tie scenarios (for 2 spots)

Scenario: D-backs, Cubs, Marlins tie; Reds eliminated
Result: Marlins and D-backs IN; Cubs OUT

In this scenario, the Marlins would earn the second Wild Card because of their 4-2 records against the D-backs and Cubs. The third Wild Card would go to the D-backs, who were 6-1 vs. Chicago.

Scenario: D-backs, Cubs, Reds tie; Marlins eliminated
Result: Reds and D-backs IN; Cubs OUT

The Reds would earn the second Wild Card in this scenario to their winning records against the D-backs (4-3) and Cubs (7-6). The D-backs would earn the third Wild Card by virtue of their 6-1 record against the Cubs.

Scenario: D-backs, Marlins, Reds tie; Cubs eliminated
Result: Marlins and Reds IN; D-backs OUT

The Marlins (.583) have the highest winning percentage against the tied clubs in this scenario, so they would get the second Wild Card. The Reds would get the third Wild Card because they won their season series vs. the D-backs, 4-3.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jamie_B said:

Here are the scenarios. 

 

4-way tie scenario (for 2 spots)

Scenario: D-backs, Cubs, Marlins, Reds tie
Result: Marlins and Reds IN; D-backs and Cubs OUT

There are four teams vying for the remaining two NL Wild Card spots. The second Wild Card spot would go to the team with the best winning percentage against the other tied clubs. That is the Marlins at .611, better than the D-backs (.550), Reds (.538) and Cubs (.346).

The third Wild Card would then go to the Reds because they own a winning record against the Cubs (7-6) and D-backs (4-3).

 

4-way tie scenario (for 1 spot)

Scenario: Cubs, Marlins, Reds, Padres tie
Result: Padres IN; Cubs, Marlins and Reds OUT

Since none of these teams have a winning record against each of the tied clubs, the tiebreaker here is based on winning percentage against the tied clubs. In this scenario, the Padres make the playoffs as their .579 winning percentage against the group is better than the Marlins' (.542), the Reds' (.531) and the Cubs' (.394).

 

3-way tie scenarios (for 1 spot)

Scenario: Marlins claim the 2nd Wild Card; D-backs, Cubs, Reds tie
Result: Reds IN; D-backs and Cubs OUT

The Reds would claim the third Wild Card because they own a winning record against the Cubs (7-6) and D-backs (4-3).

Scenario: D-backs claim 2nd Wild Card; Cubs, Marlins, Reds tie
Result: Marlins IN; Cubs and Reds OUT

Although the Marlins and Reds each won their season series vs. the Cubs, they split their six head-to-head games, meaning the third Wild Card would go to the team with the best winning percentage against the other two tied clubs. In this scenario, the Marlins would claim the third Wild Card because their .583 winning percentage against the tied clubs is better than the Reds’ (.526) and Cubs’ (.421).

Scenario: Cubs claim 2nd Wild Card; D-backs, Marlins, Reds tie
Result: Marlins IN; D-backs and Reds OUT

Since the Marlins and Reds went 3-3 in their season series, we must again consider head-to-head winning percentages to determine who grabs the third Wild Card spot. In this scenario, the Marlins (.583) make the postseason over the Reds (.538) and D-backs (.385).

Scenario: Cubs, Marlins, Padres tie
Result: Padres IN; Cubs and Marlins OUT

The third Wild Card would go to the Padres in this scenario since their winning percentage against the other two tied clubs (.538) is better than the Marlins' (.500) and the Cubs' (.462).

 

3-way tie scenarios (for 2 spots)

Scenario: D-backs, Cubs, Marlins tie; Reds eliminated
Result: Marlins and D-backs IN; Cubs OUT

In this scenario, the Marlins would earn the second Wild Card because of their 4-2 records against the D-backs and Cubs. The third Wild Card would go to the D-backs, who were 6-1 vs. Chicago.

Scenario: D-backs, Cubs, Reds tie; Marlins eliminated
Result: Reds and D-backs IN; Cubs OUT

The Reds would earn the second Wild Card in this scenario to their winning records against the D-backs (4-3) and Cubs (7-6). The D-backs would earn the third Wild Card by virtue of their 6-1 record against the Cubs.

Scenario: D-backs, Marlins, Reds tie; Cubs eliminated
Result: Marlins and Reds IN; D-backs OUT

The Marlins (.583) have the highest winning percentage against the tied clubs in this scenario, so they would get the second Wild Card. The Reds would get the third Wild Card because they won their season series vs. the D-backs, 4-3.

Good stuff..tks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

Miami and NY are in a rain delay in the top of the 9.

 

The Mets were winning at the start of the inning but now are losing 2-1

 

If they can't finish it they may have to finish at a later date if it effects the standings.

 

The game got postponed after midnight. 

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/38516920/marlins-mets-suspended-delay-3-hours-17-minutes

 

 

The game would be resumed at the point of suspension if needed to determine a playoff berth. Under rule 7.02 (b) (4) (A), if the game isn't needed to decide a postseason spot, the game would be called and the score would revert to a 1-0 Mets victory.

 

Ng spoke for less than a minute. No other players or staff members spoke with reporters as the Marlins prepared for their flight to Pittsburgh.

With rain letting up, the tarp had been removed around 12:20 a.m. Miami manager Skip Schumaker became involved on the field in an animated conversation with umpire crew chief Alfonso Márquez, a member of the Mets' grounds crew and New York senior vice president of ballpark operations Sue Lucchi.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...