BengalsGal Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 E. George is a good short-yardage back but that's about it. Once Julius Jones went down, DAL didn't have anyone who could carry the load AND had breakaway speed. CIN's run defense isn't that bad even without Tony Williams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bengaldee Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Why didn't George play that much in the second half? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-GoBengals- Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 E. George is a good short-yardage back but that's about it. Once Julius Jones went down, DAL didn't have anyone who could carry the load AND had breakaway speed. CIN's run defense isn't that bad even without Tony Williams. sooo...why arent we married? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalsGal Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 sooo...why arent we married? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Haha, probably because I'm actually a Cowboys fan first and foremost who just thought she'd find a Bengals forum to see how Bengals dudes were reacting to the game. (I'm a big Bengals fan too though - P. Warrick = fav WR). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-GoBengals- Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Haha, probably because I'm actually a Cowboys fan first and foremost who just thought she'd find a Bengals forum to see how Bengals dudes were reacting to the game. (I'm a big Bengals fan too though - P. Warrick = fav WR). i dont even care if you were a browns fan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BengalBacker Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Hey, I saw her first !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creechnasty Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Hey, I saw her first !!! Guys Guys...... fighting like this is just plain ridiculous..... besides..... I saw her first..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BengalBacker Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 Guys Guys...... fighting like this is just plain ridiculous..... besides..... I saw her first..... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You guys act like you own the board or something. Oh....wait....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BengalBacker Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 E. George is a good short-yardage back but that's about it. Once Julius Jones went down, DAL didn't have anyone who could carry the load AND had breakaway speed. CIN's run defense isn't that bad even without Tony Williams. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually, our run D is that bad with the exception of a couple of games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrod Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 BengalsGal... told ya you'd be treated like gold But anyway, they're all washed up, I'm young and fresh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoardPolice Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 GOD DAMN IT !!!!!!!!! WHO SCARED OFF THE HOT CHICK??? I was gonna get me some sweet love !!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-GoBengals- Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 :sigh: computer geeks and internet chicks.... gotta love it..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalsGal Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 You guys crack me up. I was in my usual 'Boys forum and there was just too much bitching in there. They really get really cranky after a loss, so this is a nice change and a chance to catch up on my other fav team . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrod Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 You guys crack me up. I was in my usual 'Boys forum and there was just too much bitching in there. They really get really cranky after a loss, so this is a nice change and a chance to catch up on my other fav team . <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You should just stick with us here, its easy to be a Cowboys fan after their reign in the 90s, but being a bengals fan is a tough job and when our year comes and we take it all.. it will be a bajillion times better than the feeling any other fan of another team can feel. So forget the Cowboys, and stick with us misfits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalsGal Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 You should just stick with us here, its easy to be a Cowboys fan after their reign in the 90s, but being a bengals fan is a tough job and when our year comes and we take it all.. it will be a bajillion times better than the feeling any other fan of another team can feel. So forget the Cowboys, and stick with us misfits. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'll commuter between both houses of misery lol ...I like the Bengals because they seem to have a sense of direction loading up on a ton of young talent while the 'Boys seem to be treading water going after stopgaps at seemingly every position. It's like they don't know whether to rebuild or try and contend every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BengalBacker Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 I'll commuter between both houses of misery lol ...I like the Bengals because they seem to have a sense of direction loading up on a ton of young talent while the 'Boys seem to be treading water going after stopgaps at seemingly every position. It's like they don't know whether to rebuild or try and contend every year. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't think they brought in Parcells with any sort of long term rebuilding project in mind. I think they wanted immediate results, which shows with people like Vinny and Eddie. Of course they made the playoffs last year. We'd kill to make the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalsGal Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 I don't think they brought in Parcells with any sort of long term rebuilding project in mind. I think they wanted immediate results, which shows with people like Vinny and Eddie. Of course they made the playoffs last year. We'd kill to make the playoffs. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think Parcells stated when he got here that it would be a 3-year plan with next year being the peak year. The Cowboys got to the playoffs last year mostly thanks to an easy schedule. This year, they drafted for next year picking up two OL to protect Drew Henson who will be the starter. They might throw Henson in as early as next game since the season seems lost and V-T does too and it'll be good to have Henson get some game experience before he takes over the reins full-time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NASTYNATI Posted November 8, 2004 Report Share Posted November 8, 2004 I think Parcells stated when he got here that it would be a 3-year plan with next year being the peak year. The Cowboys got to the playoffs last year mostly thanks to an easy schedule. This year, they drafted for next year picking up two OL to protect Drew Henson who will be the starter. They might throw Henson in as early as next game since the season seems lost and V-T does too and it'll be good to have Henson get some game experience before he takes over the reins full-time. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> according to espn and "boomer"(the nicknamed fat one...lol) they have proclaimed in dallas that this season is indeed a rebuilding year as stated of the bengals. im not sure about henson starting next year though... there is a reason the big tuna brought V-T into dallas and it damn sure wasnt because he was in his prime. he's expirienced and thats who a young team with playoff ability needs leading them... who knows we will see... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.