Ben Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 man...this question sucks. I dont want to outlaw casinos...i just want to implement age limits. The Issue Children as young as eight have been spotted gambling in some of Who-Dey's seedier casinos. The Debate 1. Social activist Jennifer Clinton is outraged. "Gambling needs to be outlawed immediately. It's no wonder children are becoming sucked into the vice, with adults setting such a poor example. Gambling is a stain on Who-Dey's international reputation and it must be stopped!" [Accept] 2. However, Crown Casino chairperson George W. Steele says, "What's wrong with children gambling? It prepares them for the realities of life, teaching them that success or failure is not due to hard work or intelligence, but the roll of the dice. Besides, if kids weren't gambling, they'd be spraypainting trains." [Accept] The Government Position The government has yet to formalize a position on this issue. If you wish, you may simply dismiss this issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bengalrick Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 yeah, no in between on that one... probably need to dismiss it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 [quote name='bengalrick' post='334262' date='Sep 8 2006, 03:21 PM']yeah, no in between on that one... probably need to dismiss it...[/quote] That is what i did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest steggyD Posted September 8, 2006 Report Share Posted September 8, 2006 I also had to stop people from smoking pot in the work place. I mean, you know, there's a time and a place for that, and it's called college. But not at work guys, damn Stegonians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest steggyD Posted September 9, 2006 Report Share Posted September 9, 2006 Yes!!! #1 three days in a row!!! Now I have the most compassionate citizens also. My country is so nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JBandJoeyV Posted September 9, 2006 Report Share Posted September 9, 2006 They wanted to eat my Bengals...I didnt allow that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 10, 2006 Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 [quote name='Lawman' post='333210' date='Sep 7 2006, 04:48 PM'][b]BOOMER007[/b] Our Emergency Session has just concluded and our decision as rendered... [img]http://www.spookyempire.com/pop_culture_convention/images/soup_nazi.jpg[/img] [b]NO YELLOW-CAKE FOR YOU[/b][/quote] Here, toward the end of day two of the Yellow Cake Embargo from the Republic of Allewyne, we have been promoting the use of cheesecake in lieu of yellow cake for birthday/wedding celebrations etc. to our people. This has had unexpected results, as we have now discovered that our country has an unusually high percentage of people who are lactose intolerant. Our sewage systems are now being pushed to (and in many cases beyond) their capacity throughout the country. [img]http://project3six5.com/photos/sewage.jpg[/img] The health concerns (not to mention the smell) are a huge concern for our people, and therefore, our government. There have also been a small number of deaths reported due to people having severe allergic reactions to the strawberries. A formal apology to the Republic of Allewyne will be issued on the Go Bengals page of NationStates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawman Posted September 10, 2006 Report Share Posted September 10, 2006 [quote]A formal apology to the Republic of Allewyne will be issued on the Go Bengals page of NationStates.[/quote] After a late evening of deliberations, the government of Allewyne has decide that the apology presented was sincere and ernest. We accept the apology. On the occassion of this great Holiday deemed "Opening Day or Day of Re- Birth", the Government of Allewyne announces: Embargo lifted [b]"YELLOW-CAKE FOR EVERYONE".[/b] Disclaimer: Allewyne does not wish to impose it's beliefs on anyone, allewyne only wishes that our beliefs be respected and if one choose to act in opposite of our beliefs, please do so in the privacy of your [b]OWN[/b] home and without sight of public diplay. May Eru Bless You. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 Many thanks again, to Lawman and his people. Jamie, Since you have the most UN endorsements (1), you are currently the Go Bengals region's, UN Delegate. And with that single endorsement (as I understand it) your vote on UN matters now counts as two (if you received 2 endorsements, your vote would count as 3 etc...). So, as our regional delegate, I ask you first if you are planning on voting on the "Clothing Supply Pact", currently under consideration at the UN and, if so, how do you plan to vote? Voting for this proposition ends on Thursday, 9/13. Sincerely, The people of the Democratic States of Boomerstan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChosenOne Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 [quote name='Boomer07' post='336824' date='Sep 11 2006, 08:52 AM']Jamie, Since you have the most UN endorsements (1), you are currently the Go Bengals region's, UN Delegate.[/quote] Thanks to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 [quote name='Boomer07' post='336824' date='Sep 11 2006, 08:52 AM']Many thanks again, to Lawman and his people. Jamie, Since you have the most UN endorsements (1), you are currently the Go Bengals region's, UN Delegate. And with that single endorsement (as I understand it) your vote on UN matters now counts as two (if you received 2 endorsements, your vote would count as 3 etc...). So, as our regional delegate, I ask you first if you are planning on voting on the "Clothing Supply Pact", currently under consideration at the UN and, if so, how do you plan to vote? Voting for this proposition ends on Thursday, 9/13. Sincerely, The people of the Democratic States of Boomerstan[/quote] We are taking the issue under advisement and plan on voting before the days end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 [quote name='Jamie_B' post='336943' date='Sep 11 2006, 10:05 AM']We are taking the issue under advisement and plan on voting before the days end.[/quote] The reason I ask is this: There are currently five UN member nations in the region of Go Bengals, which individually would count as five votes. You have received an endorsement, which gives you two votes and our region a total of six. Individually, we are weak. United, we can nearly double our world influence with a true democratic process. This is my proposal: 1. That all UN members of the Gobengals region decide/vote on a single delegate and all agree to endorse the winner of the concensus. As I understand it, the more endorsements a nation gets, the more power they weild in the region (i.e. moderator-like powers throughout our region.) 2. All UN proposals will be put up for debate in this, or the Nationstates forum and put to a vote (say, 24 or 48hrs before the deadline so everyone has a chance to see it). All Go Bengals UN members will agree to vote the concensus of the region, regardless of their own nation's beleifs on the subject (including the delegate). Any "ties" will be broken by the delegate, who will then inform the rest of the members how to vote. This, currently would give our region a total of nine votes in the UN and hopefully, more nations in the region will join the UN and agree to this proposal so that number (and our world influence, small as it may be) would increase. 3. If the delegate does not adhere to the will of the rest of the region, or wishes to resign, a vote will be held to decide on a new delegate, who will in turn be held to the same trust. Like I said before, if all five of us can agree on this, I believe it will benefit our region as a whole, and our nations individually. I have already voted in favor of the "Clothing Supply Pact", so I am suggesting this going forward on future proposals. Also, I have no problem with Jamie_B being the delegate, as he has proved himself, in this forum to be fair and trustworthy, and I am more than willing to give him my endorsement. However, I am wary of giving a single nation too much power, if this is just going to be a free-for-all. What say you all? [edit] It just occurred to me that we actually can have 10 full votes with only 5 members because the delegate can endorse someone. Therefore, we could have a "vice-delegate" or something that would carry two votes with the endorsement of the delegate. The vice-delegate could be decided by a seperate vote, be the runner-up in the election for the delegate, or just appointed by the delegate. The vice-delegate would also have to agree to the tenants stated above and vote the group concsience despite their national views. Also, if the elected delegate is unable or unwilling (or just stops playing), the vice delegate would get the endorsements from the rest of the region's members and organize an election for a new delegate. Remember, a united Go Bengals region is a strong Go Bengals region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bengalrick Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 the UN tried to ruin my economy... i dropped out of that corrupt, useless organization... sorry, but i doubt i will join back up, so i will be no help in your guys' plan... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted September 11, 2006 Report Share Posted September 11, 2006 I will be voting yes on this issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 [quote name='Boomer07' post='337052' date='Sep 11 2006, 11:48 AM']The reason I ask is this: There are currently five UN member nations in the region of Go Bengals, which individually would count as five votes. You have received an endorsement, which gives you two votes and our region a total of six. Individually, we are weak. United, we can nearly double our world influence with a true democratic process. This is my proposal: 1. That all UN members of the Gobengals region decide/vote on a single delegate and all agree to endorse the winner of the concensus. As I understand it, the more endorsements a nation gets, the more power they weild in the region (i.e. moderator-like powers throughout our region.) 2. All UN proposals will be put up for debate in this, or the Nationstates forum and put to a vote (say, 24 or 48hrs before the deadline so everyone has a chance to see it). All Go Bengals UN members will agree to vote the concensus of the region, regardless of their own nation's beleifs on the subject (including the delegate). Any "ties" will be broken by the delegate, who will then inform the rest of the members how to vote. This, currently would give our region a total of nine votes in the UN and hopefully, more nations in the region will join the UN and agree to this proposal so that number (and our world influence, small as it may be) would increase. 3. If the delegate does not adhere to the will of the rest of the region, or wishes to resign, a vote will be held to decide on a new delegate, who will in turn be held to the same trust. Like I said before, if all five of us can agree on this, I believe it will benefit our region as a whole, and our nations individually. I have already voted in favor of the "Clothing Supply Pact", so I am suggesting this going forward on future proposals. Also, I have no problem with Jamie_B being the delegate, as he has proved himself, in this forum to be fair and trustworthy, and I am more than willing to give him my endorsement. However, I am wary of giving a single nation too much power, if this is just going to be a free-for-all. What say you all? [edit] It just occurred to me that we actually can have 10 full votes with only 5 members because the delegate can endorse someone. Therefore, we could have a "vice-delegate" or something that would carry two votes with the endorsement of the delegate. The vice-delegate could be decided by a seperate vote, be the runner-up in the election for the delegate, or just appointed by the delegate. The vice-delegate would also have to agree to the tenants stated above and vote the group concsience despite their national views. Also, if the elected delegate is unable or unwilling (or just stops playing), the vice delegate would get the endorsements from the rest of the region's members and organize an election for a new delegate. Remember, a united Go Bengals region is a strong Go Bengals region.[/quote] Anyone have any feedback on this? We currently really only need a minimum of 3 UN members to agree in order for this to work, but all 5 would be preferred. What this offers (in short) is regional influence and power second only to Steggy's (who is the founder) in exchange for voting the concensus of the members of this 'pact'. All UN members are (or at least proclaim to be) democracies, so I see no reason why we can't handle UN matters in a truly democratic fasion. Good idea? Bad idea? I'm just an idot? Anyone? Anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 man.. i told corporations they had to stop buying candidates and now my economy went down and i dropped to 12 in the region Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 [quote name='Ben' post='337836' date='Sep 12 2006, 08:50 AM']man.. i told corporations they had to stop buying candidates and now my economy went down and i dropped to 12 in the region [/quote] You're actuall only 12th in the region in having the highest proportions of your citizens employed in government administration. What you're specifically rated on changes everyday. As far as your economy going down... bummer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalsCat Posted September 12, 2006 Report Share Posted September 12, 2006 The Republic of Hamiltoniann "WHO-DEy" UN Category: Inoffensive Centrist Democracy Civil Rights: Average Economy: Strong Political Freedoms: Very Good Location: Go Bengals Regional Influence: Minnow The Republic of Hamiltoniann is a tiny, devout nation, renowned for its barren, inhospitable landscape. Its hard-nosed, hard-working, intelligent population of 5 million have some civil rights, but not too many, enjoy the freedom to spend their money however they like, to a point, and take part in free and open elections, although not too often. The medium-sized government concentrates mainly on Religion & Spirituality, although Law & Order and Defence are on the agenda. The average income tax rate is 14%. A robust private sector is led by the Beef-Based Agriculture, Trout Farming, and Woodchip Exports industries. Crime is a problem. Hamiltoniann's national animal is the bengal tiger and its currency is the bling. You have a telegram! Your going down bitches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Henrys Dealer Posted September 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 WTF, how the hell did I get ranked 10th in the region when crime is relatively low? Also, the left leaning college tag came out of the blue, there be no tarrifs up in this motherfucker! UN Category: Left-Leaning College State Civil Rights:Excellent Economy: Good Political Freedoms: Excellent The Free Land of ChrisHenryville is a small, socially progressive nation, remarkable for its barren, inhospitable landscape. Its intelligent population of 16 million enjoy extensive civil freedoms, particularly in social issues, while business tends to be more regulated. The enormous government juggles the competing demands of Social Welfare, Education, and Healthcare. The average income tax rate is 32%, but much higher for the wealthy. A substantial private sector is led by the Automobile Manufacturing industry, followed by Retail and Trout Farming. The tenet of free speech is held dear, the government is attempting to revitalize a gutted private sector, same-sex marriages are increasingly common, and citizens can be frequently spotted going about their business stark naked. Crime is relatively low. ChrisHenryville's national animal is the ring tailed lemur, which teeters on the brink of extinction due to widespread deforestation, and its currency is the doobie. ChrisHenryville is ranked 10th in the region and 68,621st in the world for Safest Nations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Well, since none of the UN members seem interested in uniting and creating a pact... free-for-all it is. We, the government of the Democratic States of Boomerstan, have temporarily endorsed Jamie_B as our UN delegate to add an extra vote to his, on the current UN resolution up for a vote. We intend to withdraw our endorsement after the matter is decided. We will re-endorse Jamie_B (or whoever the delegate happens to be) in the future, on an issue-by-issue basis, depending on whether we agree with his stance on the issue up for a vote. We are gravely dissapointed that the UN members of region of Go Bengals could not be united with a strong, single voice in international matters. This will be our ongoing stance with regards to UN delegates, unless some sort of agreement (not necessarily the pact we proposed) can be made. Sincerely, Boomer07 Prime Minister The Democratic States of Boomerstan [quote name='Chris Henrys Dealer' post='338826' date='Sep 13 2006, 11:08 AM'][b]Also, the left leaning college tag came out of the blue, there be no tarrifs up in this motherfucker![/b][/quote] Yeah, overnight last night, my country went from a "Liberal Democratic Socialists" to just "Democratic Socialists" and this afternoon, changed to a "Scandinavian Liberal Paradise" Must be because I made public nudity legal. Mmmmm, naked Scandinavian women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest steggyD Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 I could easily join the UN, join up with you guys, and threaten to ban all other UN nations that decide not to work with us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 [quote name='Boomer07' post='339407' date='Sep 13 2006, 09:18 PM']Well, since none of the UN members seem interested in uniting and creating a pact... free-for-all it is. We, the government of the Democratic States of Boomerstan, have temporarily endorsed Jamie_B as our UN delegate to add an extra vote to his, on the current UN resolution up for a vote. We intend to withdraw our endorsement after the matter is decided. We will re-endorse Jamie_B (or whoever the delegate happens to be) in the future, on an issue-by-issue basis, depending on whether we agree with his stance on the issue up for a vote. We are gravely dissapointed that the UN members of region of Go Bengals could not be united with a strong, single voice in international matters. This will be our ongoing stance with regards to UN delegates, unless some sort of agreement (not necessarily the pact we proposed) can be made. Sincerely, Boomer07 Prime Minister The Democratic States of Boomerstan[/quote] Just want to bump this to the top of the page so nobody misses it. [quote name='steggyD' post='339410' date='Sep 13 2006, 09:21 PM']I could easily join the UN, join up with you guys, and threaten to ban all other UN nations that decide not to work with us. [/quote] Well now, that wouldn't be very democratic now would it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest steggyD Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 [quote name='Boomer07' post='339414' date='Sep 13 2006, 09:26 PM']Well now, that wouldn't be very democratic now would it? [/quote] It would be once we rid ourselves of the problem nations ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomer07 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 [quote name='steggyD' post='339415' date='Sep 13 2006, 09:27 PM']It would be once we rid ourselves of the problem nations ...[/quote] It would also weaken us, as a region. This also brings up another argument for the benefits of creating a Go Bengals UN pact. Stegland currently holds absolute power over the region that goes unchecked. They can do their will throughout the region while the rest of our nations lie impotent. We are mere pawns to their every whim. A strong, highly endorsed, UN delegate would gain power and influence in the region and, while perhaps not weilding the absolute power that Stegland does (as I understand it), would gain access to the secret "Regional Control Page" and would be able to provide a second regional power, to make decisions about what goes on in the region. Nothing against the people and government of Stegland, but we firmly believe in a system of checks and balances system, and not an autocratic one. Just food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChosenOne Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 The Democratic Republic of The ChosenOne has been endorsing the nation of Jamie_B as UN Delegate for a while now, and will continue to do so. -TheChosenOne, President of the Democratic Republic of The ChosenOne Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.