Jump to content

palmer would make a great commercial....


Recommended Posts

[quote name='whodeywedey' post='203317' date='Jan 14 2006, 02:08 AM']I'VE FALLEN..AND CAN'T GET UP....then stay down bitch!!![/quote]


wow.....just......wow :blink:

does anyone even understand this? Was this supposed to upset us or something?
Maybe if I actually understood it, it might bother me.... :pointlaff:
This is by far, one of the dumbest things I've ever read....
oh wait... let me guess.....homeschooled in TRAILERnation?

Dumb to mentally handicapped in less then 3 threads.... :lmao:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='chiefsfan' post='203346' date='Jan 13 2006, 09:38 PM'][quote name='whodeywedey' post='203319' date='Jan 13 2006, 10:10 PM']
actually...I feel like I could drag you down like Kimo did to Palmer...snap crackle pop!!!![/quote]
whodey, whodey.... :D
[/quote]
if your talking shit...to bengals fans...

try making the playoffs first...

and to that whodeywedey bitch...your about as good as gone...and your a fucking loser...your a classless son of a bitch...and lucky you can hide behind your computer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='advocate' date='Jan 14 2006, 05:04 AM' post='203538']
[
[/quote]

pssstt.....they're a little slow....it's that inner breeding thing....
[/quote]


inner breeding?

does that mean doin it inside honey?
[/quote]

oops...added an extra "ner" on there didn't I?...let me fix that for you and explain...it's "in breeding"...I
just had quick fingers when I was typing.....anyway...

Inbreeding is the mating of related individuals. However, inbreeding is usually defined as matings between fairly closely related individuals. The most extreme inbreeding being that between a father and daughter, or mother and son, followed closely by full sibs mating, then half-sibs, grandparent-grandchild, and first cousins, or uncle-niece and aunt-nephew....There are significant increases in levels of handicapped offspring associated with inbreeding. Inbreeding was associated with a 37.5% increase in offspring with one or two major handicaps, while it also caused a 24.1% increase in offspring with one or two minor defects. Moreover, inbreeding caused an increase of 31.7% in hearing impairments. Brain development also seemed to be affected by inbreeding.

I'm sorry you had to find out this way....you may want to confront your mother/sister now....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='whodeywedey' post='203317' date='Jan 13 2006, 09:08 PM']I'VE FALLEN..AND CAN'T GET UP....then stay down bitch!!![/quote]


wow, our QB tears 3 ligiments in his knee and doesnt somplain or say a word... your gets a foney toe injury, a bad thumb, or a vagina bruise and he is calling people dirty players and making excuses for his lack of success when it counts... what a leader youve got there...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Idioteque' post='203462' date='Jan 14 2006, 12:58 AM']A classless, bullshit post that is NOT indicative of Pittsburgh Steeler fans.

Good move, douche.[/quote]

Even thought you piss me off sometimes. You and southern are o.k. in my book. Well...you less thank southern.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe you guys wanted Ben or any other Steeler to get physically hurt... Nobody wanted Carson to get hurt. I damn sure didn't want you assholes crying about losing because your QB was hurt. It just shows what a bunch of classless Aholes you all are... We look forward to kicking your sorry OHIO butts next year...

[img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img] [img]http://forum.go-bengals.com/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/24.gif[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest bungals

No, the Seahawks lost because:

Strong safety Michael Boulware whiffed on a clean shot at running back Willie Parker on Parker's record-setting 75-yard TD run.
Kicker Josh Brown missed 50- and 54-yard field goal attempts (accuracy rather than distance was the issue in both instances).
Stevens repeatedly dropped critical passes.
The Seahawks' vaunted offensive line lost the battle of the trenches.
Punter Tom Rouen (and cornerback Jordan Babineaux) couldn't pin the Steelers deep once.
Fullback Mack Strong (on a third-and-3 reception) and wide receiver Darrell Jackson (trying to get his feet in bounds) were too often more nonchalant than possessed in their efforts.
The Seahawks' defense got suckered on a 43-yard gadget for a TD. Holmgren should bring all that up the next time there's a get-together at Qwest Field.
And he should bring a team as schooled in responding to adversity as the Steelers to his next Super Bowl.

The Steelers have played many games where they were getting screwed by the refs including the Dolts game. The difference is simple. The Steelers have finally found a way not to let the refs beat them.

1. The offensive pass interference that nullified a touchdown. Let's face facts here folks, Darrel Jackson DID push off. Was it enough to gain a competitive advantage on that play? I don't know, nor do I care. What I DO know is that he did it right IN FRONT of an official. Regardless of how slight the push was, when you do it 2 yards away from a ref, he's going to call it EVERY FUCKING TIME. Deal with it. Oh, and for the record, the ref did NOT hesitate. He reached for his flag immediately. The flag, however, slipped from his grasp and he had to grab for it a second time before finally being able to throw it.

2. The holding call on Sean Locklear was legitimate. By the very definition of the rule, what he did was holding. Always was, always will be. Do they always call it? No. Should they? Absolutely.

3. The low-block on penalty on Hasselbeck was, at best, iffy, and at worst, a wrong call. So what. The extra 15 yards the Steelers got because of that were inconsequential. Without it, Randle El's touchdown pass to Hines Ward would have been good for 58 yards instead of 43. He was THAT wide open. There, does that make Seattle's fans (all 15 of them) feel better?


But, just for the sake of argument, let's say that all three of these penalties (and the 4 others) were blatantly and obviously wrong. Do I, as a Steeler fan, give half of a shit? Nope. Not because I favor a win all costs, cheat if necessary philosophy, but rather because as far as I'm concerned, this was payback. Payback for all the shitty calls that have gone against the Steelers over the years, from the Thanksgiving Day coin-toss fiasco in Detroit to the overturning of Troy Polamalu's interception of Manning just 3 weeks ago. From the phantom 12 men on the field call (leading to the subsequent stuffing of the picture in the refs pocket by Bill Cowher) to the missed interference against Antwaan Randle El in that same Indy game just a few weekends back. I'm sure someone can tell me the exact figure, but personally, I've lost track of how many official "letters of apology" that we've received from the league over the years. So, to all you Seattle fans out there who feel cheated, I have just this to say: "Welcome to my world." :1violin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Request: 71.224.4.129
connected to whois.arin.net [69.25.34.144:43] ...
Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. JUMPSTART-5 (NET-71-224-0-0-1)
71.224.0.0 - 71.236.255.255
Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. PA-30 (NET-71-224-0-0-2)
71.224.0.0 - 71.225.255.255

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-02-08 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.


Location: 71.224.4.129 US UNITED STATES NEW JERSEY MT. LAUREL COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS INC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...