Jump to content

MSNBC's Anchor O'Donnell is a Socialist


BengalBacker

Recommended Posts

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289508779' post='939993']
I am not defending Backer. I am a grown man capable of saying what I think.
I saw a post and then some ridiculing from someone that was uncalled for,
and had nothing to do with the topic. And I responded to it.

Go tell Go. I don't care. Matter of a fact, I don't care what he had to say yesterday either.

I am just going to start posting more in this forum.
I am allowed. Aren't I?
[/quote]


Then when I take of the kid gloves and tell you exactly what I think of you dont go crying to mommy that your being bullied.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289508920' post='939994']
Then when I take of the kid gloves and tell you exactly what I think of you dont go crying to mommy that your being bullied.
[/quote]


Take them off. Tell me what you think. Lay in to me.
Don't hold back. Give it all you got.


By the way, Homer is a grown man capable of defending himself.
Hypocrite.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289509044' post='939995']
Take them off. Tell me what you think. Lay in to me.
Don't hold back. Give it all you got.


By the way, Homer is a grown man capable of defending himself.
Hypocrite.
[/quote]

I think better of that I'm not going to be baited into this go can deal with it .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289509574' post='939998']
I think better of that I'm not going to be baited into this go can deal with it .
[/quote]



Baited?

You are the one that said you were going to do it.
I just told you to go ahead.

And yeah, run to Go again. I don't care. Is he going to
stop me from posting in this forum now? No.

I just responded to something that was said in this thread.
You felt compelled to tell me Backer was a grown man
that could defend himself. But the same could be said of
Homer. So that makes you a hypocrite. I already knew that
though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289510187' post='940003']
Baited?

You are the one that said you were going to do it.
I just told you to go ahead.

And yeah, run to Go again. I don't care. Is he going to
stop me from posting in this forum now? No.

I just responded to something that was said in this thread.
You felt compelled to tell me Backer was a grown man
that could defend himself. But the same could be said of
Homer. So that makes you a hypocrite. I already knew that
though.
[/quote]


You can tell yourself whatever you want, we both know why you came into this thread.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289513375' post='940021']
My reasons for posting in this are just as justified as Homer's and your's.

Like I said, seeing something I want to respond to, and because I can
respond to it are enough. Aren't they? :29:
[/quote]


Like I said you tell yourself whatever you need to.

I have better things to do with my time than to keep feeding the trolls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289513821' post='940028']
Like I said you tell yourself whatever you need to.

I have better things to do with my time than to keep feeding the trolls.
[/quote]



Do I really need to give you anymore reasons for me posting in this thread?
If not, please shut the fuck up now. In other words, I expect you to shut the
fuck up now.

Also, I am a troll? Really? I did nothing worse than your boy did. Yet, I am
defending someone, you're not. I am a troll, he's not.

Typical.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289514172' post='940032']
Do I really need to give you anymore reasons for me posting in this thread?
If not, please shut the fuck up now. In other words, I expect you to shut the
fuck up now.

Also, I am a troll? Really? I did nothing worse than your boy did. Yet, I am
defending someone, you're not. I am a troll, he's not.

Typical.
[/quote]


Im not defending anyone, Im saying I know you came in here for nefarious reasons, your intent isnt to defend a grown ass man, its to carry on an argument that was already over yesterday. You know it, I know it, and anyone paying attention knows it. To say otherwise is just being disingenuous, but then you already knew that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289514812' post='940038']
Im not defending anyone, Im saying I know you came in here for nefarious reasons, your intent isnt to defend a grown ass man, its to carry on an argument that was already over yesterday. You know it, I know it, and anyone paying attention knows it. To say otherwise is just being disingenuous, but then you already knew that.
[/quote]

Nefarious? :24:


I was not defending anyone. You said it, not me.
I said if I am defending Backer, then that means you
are defending Homer. Which would also make you
a hypocrite. So you're right. My intent was not to
defend a grown man. And also, if that was my intent,
then how they hell could that be nefarious? :24: again

This thread was near the top. YOU posted in it this morning.I read it, which I had not before.
I saw something I wanted to respond to, and did. That's it. That's all and that's final.

If I wanted to continue shit from yesterday, I would have commented in that thread.
Instead I saw something worthy of me commenting in this thread. Now you can
believe that, believe something else or whatever. I do not care. I should not have
to justify my posting in this thread anymore than anyone else has had to.

Funny that you and Homer are both telling people why Backer and I made posts.
Who the hell do you guys think you are? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289515720' post='940046']
Nefarious? :24:


I was not defending anyone. You said it, not me.
I said if I am defending Backer, then that means you
are defending Homer. Which would also make you
a hypocrite. So you're right. My intent was not to
defend a grown man. And also, if that was my intent,
then how they hell could that be nefarious? :24: again

This thread was near the top. YOU posted in it this morning.I read it, which I had not before.
I saw something I wanted to respond to, and did. That's it. That's all and that's final.

If I wanted to continue shit from yesterday, I would have commented in that thread.
Instead I saw something worthy of me commenting in this thread. Now you can
believe that, believe something else or whatever. I do not care. I should not have
to justify my posting in this thread anymore than anyone else has had to.

Funny that you and Homer are both telling people why Backer and I made posts.
Who the hell do you guys think you are? LOL
[/quote]


Sure, whatever you say. (snickers)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To answer John's question: Read H.G. Well's, "The Open Conspiracy." His use of the term is more neutral than most uses, which tend to allow one to infer fringe craziness whenever one hears the word. A conspiracy is simply the concerted effort of a group of people to work towards a set of goals. By that standard, there is no socialist conspiracy in the US anymore, but the rise of the Tea Party certainly fits the bill. Antonio Gramsci, a real communist, were he still alive, would likely have described this movement as a particular form of general or mass strike. Which is to say a sort of unorganized uprising that coalesces around a loose set of goals and in which the leadership is fairly diffuse.

And as far as I am concerned, you are welcome in this forum any time, oldschooler. The way I see it, the more you post, the more we'll discover that you are a two-bit Emperor with No Clothes. But please do prove me wrong by providing some substance; your performance yesterday and today doesn't really serve you well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Homer_Rice' timestamp='1289519819' post='940070']
And as far as I am concerned, you are welcome in this forum any time, oldschooler.

The way I see it, the more you post, the more we'll discover that you are a two-bit Emperor with No Clothes. But please do prove me wrong by providing some substance; your performance yesterday and today doesn't really serve you well.[/quote]

Thanks. I am glad I have your blessing. (Damn sarcasm font isn't working)
It really doesn't matter what you thought.

And my performance in this thread was no different than your's.

I am also sure that it doesn't matter what I post, your opinion
of me will not change one bit. But that's OK. I am not here for
your approval.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289362790' post='939494']
I have a question though. Backer, when you were out of work a few years ago and were looking for a job were you collecting unemployment?
[/quote]


What does this have to do with anything?

To collect unemployment, you have to have had a job.
It is not just given to you anyway. Sometimes people are denied
unemployment. So really, what does him getting unemployment
or not getting unemployment have to do with anything?

Oh wait. Am I defending a grown man again?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289524660' post='940084']
What does this have to do with anything?

To collect unemployment, you have to have had a job.
It is not just given to you anyway. Sometimes people are denied
unemployment. So really, what does him getting unemployment
or not getting unemployment have to do with anything?

Oh wait. Am I defending a grown man again?
[/quote]


Its a social government program the kind of government take over you people are against, you know because they cant do anything right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289525847' post='940092']
Its a social government program the kind of government take over you people are against, you know because they cant do anything right.
[/quote]

You people?

You mean us humans?

At first glance that sounds really elitest....

I really hope it is not and taken out of context...

It is a social program that we are forced to pay in to so why not reap the benefits?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jamie_B' timestamp='1289525847' post='940092']
Its a social government program the kind of government take over you people are against, you know because they cant do anything right.
[/quote]

You people? LOL


It's a social government program in a Democracy.
That in no way inclines that if you recieve something
you had to work for and qualify for, that that makes you
a Socialist or for Socialism, like the dude in the video.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Tigers Johnson' timestamp='1289526175' post='940093']
You people?

You mean us humans?

At first glance that sounds really elitest....

I really hope it is not and taken out of context...

It is a social program that we are forced to pay in to so why not reap the benefits?
[/quote]


Yes your taking out of context. I mean to say you people that are against social programs and you people that think the government cant do anything right.

I agree take advantage of it, I have no issue with that at all.

I do have issue with people that might hint at it being socialism.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='oldschooler' timestamp='1289526271' post='940094']
You people? LOL


It's a social government program in a Democracy.
That in no way inclines that if you recieve something
you had to work for and qualify for, that that makes you
a Socialist or for Socialism, like the dude in the video.
[/quote]


No it doesnt, its not socialism. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...