Jason Posted June 14, 2016 Report Share Posted June 14, 2016 QB - Ken Anderson LT - Anthony Munoz RT - Willie Anderson TE - Rodney Holman C - Bob Johnson LG - Bruce Reimers RG - Max Montoya Today we do slot/3rd WR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted June 14, 2016 Report Share Posted June 14, 2016 No Housh?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted June 14, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 14, 2016 59 minutes ago, fluhartz said: No Housh?????? I thought about it. He will be in the outside list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|High School Harry| Posted June 14, 2016 Report Share Posted June 14, 2016 No Jeff Query? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 No Mike Martin, no vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happyrid Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 14 hours ago, fluhartz said: No Housh?????? That's who I was thinking of for this role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 I thought about it. He will be in the outside list. He won't make it for an outside guy.. And he's the best slot we ever had.. Oh well.. This is still pretty cool... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 That's who I was thinking of for this role. Me too... When I saw the topic.. Before I even opened it, it's who I thought of... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted June 15, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 I guess if people want to "write in" Housh they can. If you have already voted in the poll and want to change it to TJ let me know who you voted for so I can count correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimKrumrieFan Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 Housh lined up way more outside than inside I feel like. Feel like either way it should be a runaway for Henry even in his small sample size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted June 15, 2016 Report Share Posted June 15, 2016 I guess if people want to "write in" Housh they can. If you have already voted in the poll and want to change it to TJ let me know who you voted for so I can count correctly. I don't really care that much...I just thought Housh was the guy.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sois Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 This is hard, Slim or P-Dub. P-Dub would have been amazing in todays NFL. He risked his career for the Bengals. I pick him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimKrumrieFan Posted June 17, 2016 Report Share Posted June 17, 2016 22 hours ago, sois said: This is hard, Slim or P-Dub. P-Dub would have been amazing in todays NFL. He risked his career for the Bengals. I pick him. Pdub would have been amazing if he didn't get hurt. He was never a guy that was going to be a #1 for an offense, but he would have been the best of the best as a #2 WR. When he finally got a good WR opposite him and a competent QB he risked his career for a playoff spot and was physically ruined after that. I imagine he would have crushed even the #'s that Housh put up and only God knows what Carson and company would have been able to do if they had Pdub for those years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted June 17, 2016 Report Share Posted June 17, 2016 This is hard, Slim or P-Dub. P-Dub would have been amazing in todays NFL. He risked his career for the Bengals. I pick him. Agreed.. I voted P-Dub too. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve4192 Posted June 18, 2016 Report Share Posted June 18, 2016 On 6/15/2016 at 0:46 PM, TimKrumrieFan said: Housh lined up way more outside than inside I feel like. Feel like either way it should be a runaway for Henry even in his small sample size. Whitworth lined up way more at LT than LG, but that didn't stop him from being listed (and winning) the LG position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve4192 Posted June 18, 2016 Report Share Posted June 18, 2016 I think we should scrap this category altogether. I find it ludicrous that Chris Henry will be on the Bengals 'All-Time' team over Chad Johnson. If you are going to take three receivers, just take three receivers. Don't try to shoehorn in a guy from a specific role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justcallmedaddy Posted July 30, 2016 Report Share Posted July 30, 2016 No Chad Johnson as one of the three receivers on an all-time Bengals team is silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted July 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2016 37 minutes ago, Justcallmedaddy said: No Chad Johnson as one of the three receivers on an all-time Bengals team is silly. We've already had this discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEarl Posted July 31, 2016 Report Share Posted July 31, 2016 On 6/18/2016 at 11:29 AM, Steve4192 said: I think we should scrap this category altogether. I find it ludicrous that Chris Henry will be on the Bengals 'All-Time' team over Chad Johnson. If you are going to take three receivers, just take three receivers. Don't try to shoehorn in a guy from a specific role. I agree. While Housh lined up in the slot a lot, he was the #2 guy for most of his career. So, which is it, the slot or #3 receiver? The same would apply for Warrick. Steve Krieder was a true #3 receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|Lucid| Posted July 31, 2016 Report Share Posted July 31, 2016 Dudes, seriously? This thing Jason has going has been a wonderful breath of fresh air during an EXTREMELY boring time. Lets try and keep the criticism of his method to a minimum. This is just some fluffy fun to talk about when nothing else is going on. Thanks Jason for a very entertaining exercise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEarl Posted August 1, 2016 Report Share Posted August 1, 2016 8 hours ago, Lucid said: Dudes, seriously? This thing Jason has going has been a wonderful breath of fresh air during an EXTREMELY boring time. Lets try and keep the criticism of his method to a minimum. This is just some fluffy fun to talk about when nothing else is going on. Thanks Jason for a very entertaining exercise. I agree it's been a lot of fun, but just laying out an opinion. If he decides to keep it the way it is, OK. If he is convinced to make a change, OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.