MichaelWeston Posted March 10, 2017 Report Share Posted March 10, 2017 Offensive tackles 1. Garett Bolles, Utah* 2. Ryan Ramczyk, Wisconsin* 3. Cam Robinson, Alabama* 4. Roderick Johnson, Florida State* 5. Jermaine Eluemunor, Texas A&M 6. Zach Banner, USC 7. Julien Davenport, Bucknell 8. Conor McDermott, UCLA 9. Aviante Collins, Texas Christian 10. Chad Wheeler, USC Frankly, there are no elite prospects in this group. When I do my Mock Draft 3.0 next week, there's a chance I won't have a single offensive lineman in the top 20. That has never happened in the real draft since the NFL merger in 1970. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akiliMVP Posted March 10, 2017 Report Share Posted March 10, 2017 CBS had a mock with Ramczyk going #8. Highest I've seen one so far. That being said, it is a super weak tackle class and there's no way they draft Ced O's replacement already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 10, 2017 Report Share Posted March 10, 2017 No tackles at 9, but an interesting guard--a natural lifelong RIGHT guard--may be around in the second round: Dan Feeney from Indiana. I watched a lot of IU football this year, and this guy has Pro-level agility, quicks, power, and mean as hell. This guy has the goods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 None of them are worth 9. They wouldn't do it anyway unless it was the second coming of Munoz. They still like Ced O and won't give up on him this quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randle P McMurphy Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 As others have already said, no tackles worth picking at #9. Maybe Garrett Bolles falls to our 2nd round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BENgal Solo Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 I'm a firm believer in BPA. If there are no tackles worth taking when Cincy picks then take whichever player can immediately help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HavePityPlease Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 draftcountdown.com (finally) updated their mock and now they have us taking this Garrett Bolles guy at 9. Um, why? What's so great about this guy? In the video that draftcoundown have on him on his profile page he looks AWFUL. He's getting tossed around, jolted back, I mean my god it's bad. I've also watched some video of Cam Robinson and Ramczyk, and Ramczyk to me easily looks like the best of the bunch (and Robinson looks better than this Bolles). Can someone enlighten me as to what's so great about him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelWeston Posted March 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 Traditionally we draft to fill needs of free agents who might leave after next year. Currently that is Eifert, Burfict and Bodine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo Montoya Posted March 11, 2017 Report Share Posted March 11, 2017 No way we take a tackle at nine. Defense is a strength of this class and we will take a DE, LB, or safety, IMO. Best player available and it will not be an OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jpoore Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 We ahould take reciever. But mo tackles at 9.Sent from my 2PYB2 using Go-Bengals.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|Harley| Posted March 12, 2017 Report Share Posted March 12, 2017 The mocks are all over the place. It will be BPA or we trade down for more picks, although doubtful. I hope we don't go RB, WR or OL. Rather DE, DT or LB. I am a believer in BPA so it could be a big surprise depending on who falls. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.