Jump to content

Bengals cut down day moves


Recommended Posts

[quote name='Bengals1181' timestamp='1346446489' post='1153433']
[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]
[url="https://twitter.com/CincyJungle"][b]Josh Kirkendall[/b] ‏[size=3][s]@[/s][b]CincyJungle[/b][/size][/url][/background][/font][/color][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]
If the Bengals keep seven WRs, have to believe that one of them is designed for a later transaction (aka, probable trade)[/background][/font][/color]
[/quote]

Why does this have to be the case? Assuming Whalen is the 7th, he can help on STs as well. if he's one of the best 53 they have - and I believe he is, I'd keep him.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bengals1181' timestamp='1346446185' post='1153429']



[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)] [/background][/font][/color][url="https://twitter.com/joereedy"][s]@[/s][b]joereedy[/b][/url][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]DE DeQuin Evans released but possibility of ending up on the PS[/background][/font][/color][url="https://twitter.com/search/?src=hash&q=%23bengals"][s]#[/s][b]bengals[/b][/url]
[/quote]

I hope he comes back; he's shown an ability to get to the passer. I thought he might have a shot at the 53 this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='texbengal' timestamp='1346448532' post='1153458']
I hope he comes back; he's shown an ability to get to the passer. I thought he might have a shot at the 53 this year.
[/quote]

I did too, but the emergence of Burfict kind of flipped the roster from 9DL/6LB to 8DL/7LB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='BlackJesus' timestamp='1346448722' post='1153461']
[b]All I know is Burfict better not get cut. [/b]

[b]If so, he'll go to the Pro Bowl for the Colts[/b]
[/quote]

Possibly

[quote name='BlackJesus' timestamp='1346448722' post='1153461']
[b]this year. [/b]
[/quote]

No.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)][url="https://twitter.com/CBSSportsNFLCIN"][b]Bengals RapidReports[/b] ‏[size=3][s]@[/s][b]CBSSportsNFLCIN[/b][/size][/url][/background][/font][/color]
[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]RT [url="https://twitter.com/joereedy"][s]@[/s][b]joereedy[/b][/url]: OG Otis Hudson being released but will end up on practice squad if not claimed [url="https://twitter.com/search/?src=hash&q=%23bengals"][s]#[/s][b]bengals[/b][/url][/background][/font][/color]









I gotta imagine that with Hudson cut either a trade is near or they plan on picking up someone else somewhere.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='texbengal' timestamp='1346448440' post='1153457']
Why does this have to be the case? Assuming Whalen is the 7th, he can help on STs as well. if he's one of the best 53 they have - and I believe he is, I'd keep him.
[/quote]

I guess it doesn't have to be the case, but most teams keep 5. Some keep 4 and some keep 6. It's extremely rare for any team to keep 7. Especially a team like the Bengals who will keep 3 TEs, a FB and at least 3 RBs, most likely 4.

Even if we kept only 2 QBs, we'd be looking at 17 roster spots just for the skill positions on offense, which is really high.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[url="https://twitter.com/joereedy"][s]@[/s][b]joereedy[/b][/url][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]: Whalen has made the 53 [/background][/font][/color][url="https://twitter.com/search/?src=hash&q=%23bengals"][s]#[/s][b]bengals[/b][/url]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Arkansas Bengal' timestamp='1346449033' post='1153465']
Bye Otis

[img]http://www.otisdayandtheknights.com/2.0/bio-otis-animalhouse.jpg[/img]
[/quote]

I'd bet a good amount of money that nobody claims him. In which case he's sticking around another year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='texbengal' timestamp='1346448440' post='1153457']
Why does this have to be the case? Assuming Whalen is the 7th, he can help on STs as well. if he's one of the best 53 they have - and I believe he is, I'd keep him.
[/quote]

Seven is really too many, plus WR is almost the only healthy position group on the team. I don't really think there'll still be seven WRs on the team on opening day. It leaves a banged-up team too vulnerable at other positions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)] [/background][/font][/color][url="https://twitter.com/mikejurecki"][s]@[/s][b]mikejurecki[/b][/url][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]: I’m hearing Vontaze Burfict has made it through the round of cuts which means he’s currently on the 53 man roster.[/background][/font][/color]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='GoBengals' timestamp='1346447833' post='1153450']
cochart doesnt bring all that much to the table, IMO. gresham is the long term TE, lee bring more to the table in the short term on the field...
[/quote]Is there some unwritten rule that the Bengals can only keep 3 TEs?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='blueridge' timestamp='1346449841' post='1153475']
Is there some unwritten rule that the Bengals can only keep 3 TEs?
[/quote]

no, but with them keeping 7 WR (assumably), there's no way they keep 4 TE's.

[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]
[url="https://twitter.com/joereedy"][b]Joe Reedy[/b] ‏[size=3][s]@[/s][b]joereedy[/b][/size][/url][/background][/font][/color][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]
Also hearing that OG/C Trevor Robinson has made the 53. So at least one undrafted guy has made it. [url="https://twitter.com/search/?src=hash&q=%23bengals"][s]#[/s][b]bengals[/b][/url][/background][/font][/color]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bengals1181' timestamp='1346449816' post='1153474']
[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)] [/background][/font][/color][url="https://twitter.com/mikejurecki"][s]@[/s][b]mikejurecki[/b][/url][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]: I’m hearing Vontaze Burfict has made it through the round of cuts which means he’s currently on the 53 man roster.[/background][/font][/color]
[/quote]


The way he's played this preseason he deserves a chance on the team.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Bengals1181' timestamp='1346448703' post='1153460']
I did too, but the emergence of Burfict kind of flipped the roster from 9DL/6LB to 8DL/7LB
[/quote]Evans had no shot to make the 53-As a DE/LB,there is no way he beats out Dontay Moch. Ever.

[quote name='Bengals1181' timestamp='1346448970' post='1153463']
[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245,245,245)][url="https://twitter.com/CBSSportsNFLCIN"][b]Bengals RapidReports[/b] ‏[size=3][s]@[/s][b]CBSSportsNFLCIN[/b][/size][/url][/background][/font][/color]
[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245,245,245)]RT [url="https://twitter.com/joereedy"][s]@[/s][b]joereedy[/b][/url]: OG Otis Hudson being released but will end up on practice squad if not claimed [url="https://twitter.com/search/?src=hash&q=%23bengals"][s]#[/s][b]bengals[/b][/url][/background][/font][/color]









I gotta imagine that with Hudson cut either a trade is near or they plan on picking up someone else somewhere.
[/quote]They should just cut their losses with Hudson. He's had two seasons to make his drafting look like a good move, and he's done nothing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]
[url="https://twitter.com/Cali_Kushh"][b]BabeRuth[/b] ‏[size=3][s]@[/s][b]Cali_Kushh[/b][/size][/url][/background][/font][/color][color=#333333][font=Arial, sans-serif][background=rgb(245, 245, 245)]
Soooo proud of the kid [url="https://twitter.com/Mo_12_Sanu"][s]@[/s][b]Mo_12_Sanu[/b][/url] right now !! Do your thing bruh bruh!![/background][/font][/color]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='texbengal' timestamp='1346448331' post='1153456']
In the receiving game, for sure. Blocking, maybe not. Sounds like he's a great mentor for the young TEs, though, and that's a positive, too.

I think Cochart has a future in the league, but I don't believe he is PS eligible because he played a lot of games last year.
[/quote]He does have a future. Cochart is very athletic and an all-around TE. It would be a fucking shame to cut the kid loose now. P.S. Chase Coffman is available.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting that Trevor Robinson made it and they're keeping 7 WRs....

They also have to keep Kyle Cook on the 53 until Tuesday if they're going to use that special IR spot on him. That would mean Cook, Robinson, the 5 starters, plus Collins would be 8. I assumed Roland would make it, but maybe not. Hard to figure the numbers if there's 9 OL and 7 WRs, even if its just temporary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='happyrid' timestamp='1346451254' post='1153487']
Interesting that Trevor Robinson made it and they're keeping 7 WRs....

They also have to keep Kyle Cook on the 53 until Tuesday if they're going to use that special IR spot on him. That would mean Cook, Robinson, the 5 starters, plus Collins would be 8. I assumed Roland would make it, but maybe not. Hard to figure the numbers if there's 9 OL and 7 WRs, even if its just temporary.
[/quote]

Alexander loves Roland, with his smarts and versatility. I'm guessing he's on the 53.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[b]Cincinnati Bengals: [/b][color=#000000][font=Georgia,]Waived tight end [/font][/color][url="http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/7167/colin-cochart"]Colin Cochart[/url][color=#000000][font=Georgia,], per a league source.[/font][/color]

[color=#000000][font=Georgia,]From: [/font][/color][url="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/31/53-man-roster-tracker/"]http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/08/31/53-man-roster-tracker/[/url]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...