CincyInDC Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 Carolina Panthers confirmed in Munich, and we get an NFL Tram to boot. Run this through Google Translate if you are so inclined: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/nfl-muenchen-2024-carolina-panthers-infos-1.6331482 Bengals have an away game @Carolina, so who knows? Maybe we end up playing in my backyard. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincyInDC Posted January 11 Author Report Share Posted January 11 Bears Vikings Jags (of course) ... in London. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|High School Harry| Posted January 11 Report Share Posted January 11 I think we are traveling to Pittsburgh next season which counts as a third world country. 4 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted February 27 Report Share Posted February 27 I could give my reasons, but I'll just cut to the chase.... here are my predictions for the five 2024 international games: Wembley: Jets at Jaguars Spurs: Rams at Bears / Texans at Vikings Allianz (Munich): Bengals at Panthers Sau Paulo Brazil: Current Browns at Eagles I'm probably wrong. I always am. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted February 28 Report Share Posted February 28 4 hours ago, AmishBengalFan said: I could give my reasons, but I'll just cut to the chase.... here are my predictions for the five 2024 international games: Wembley: Jets at Jaguars Spurs: Rams at Bears / Texans at Vikings Allianz (Munich): Bengals at Panthers Sau Paulo Brazil: Browns at Eagles I'm probably wrong. I always am. Well alot of Nati heritage was German. ( Hence alot of German breweries) That said I doubt any young German knows anything about the past as well as Cincinnati.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted February 28 Report Share Posted February 28 Wir kommen nach Munchen! Prost! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincyInDC Posted February 28 Author Report Share Posted February 28 7 hours ago, Le Tigre said: Wir kommen nach Munchen! Prost! Griast Eich! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted February 28 Report Share Posted February 28 9 hours ago, claptonrocks said: Well alot of Nati heritage was German. ... Indeed, Cincinnati was to Germans what Boston was to Irish. Chicago later stole it's 'thunder', but there was a time when Cincinnati was projected to be one of the US's largest cities. Nun zurück zum Fußball mit den Händen 🏈 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincyInDC Posted February 28 Author Report Share Posted February 28 Sister Cities of the State Capital Munich: These coats of arms are displayed under an arch/niche in the Neues Rathaus (new town hall). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 On 2/28/2024 at 7:00 AM, BlackJesus said: Nun zurück zum Fußball mit den Händen NEIN! Handbälle sind eine Art Strafstoß Aber man muss den Kick machen 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 I find no direct flights from CVG to MUC, but the four least-inconvenient ones I've found (assuming travel in late October, departing on a Wed and returning 6 days later): United to ORD, 51m layover, Lufthansa to MUC Air Canada to YYZ, 3h layover, Lufthansa to MUC United to EWR, 53m layover, United to MUC United to IAD, 1h6m layover, United to MUC Of the 4, I would prefer the longer layover in Toronto, if only to have a better chance of making a connection that likely involves changing terminals and passing thru Security a 2nd time (ORD, EWR and YYZ guaranteed, IAD likely). Plus the YYZ connection lands at 10am, the others at 7am. Much easier to check into your hotel room after a long-ass flight when you get to the front desk at noon rather than 9am. Trust me, even with my hotel "status" and early check-in guarantees, showing up in London mid-morning on both prior NFL trips meant a significant wait for my room. A noon show-up would've meant avoiding that wait. I presume MUC would be similar. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 Rationale for my predictions: My assumptions are: 1 - Except for JAX, no team will play TWO international games. 2 - If JAX plays two, they will be back-to-back and BOTH must be in London (like 2023) 3 - Divisional games are not desired (though they have happened) 4 - Cross-conference games are desired as they don't impact tiebreakers as much. 5 - Games against a team's previously-unscheduled "Game 17" opponent are highly desired as the visitor still plays 8 domestic road games, including every team already on their schedule due to rotation. 6 - NFC hosts against PIT and AFC hosts against GBP or DAL are unlikely (those home teams likely want the extra revenue that the visiting bandwagon will bring, and they only get one shot at that money every 8 seasons). Here are the 'home' games each of the locked-in International Series teams will play: JAX: HOU IND TEN NEP NYJ CFT GBP MIN CHI: DET GBP MIN LAR SEA CAR JAX TEN NEP MIN: CHI DET GBP ARI SFF ATL HOU IND NYJ CAR: ATL NOS TBB DAL NYG ARI KCC LAC CIN PHI: DAL NYG WAS ATL CAR GBP CFT PIT JAX The first three are division opponents The next three are conference opponents The next two are cross-conference opponents (desired under assumption 4) These are ITALIC The ninth one (if there is one) is the "Game 17" opponent (highly desired under assmuption 5) These are UNDERLINED If we throw out CHI/MIN/CAR/PHI as a visiting international team (assumption 1), non-London JAX-as-a-visitor (assumption 2), division opponents (assumption 3), and NFC/PIT AFC/GBP/DAL (assumption 6), we're left with: JAX: --- --- --- NEP NYJ CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX TEN NEP MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF ATL HOU IND NYJ CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI KCC LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- ATL --- GBP CFT --- --- The following teams played Internationally last year - I see no way they'll go again this year: NEP KCC BAL ATL MIA TEN IND BUF (I've taken JAX off this list, for obvious reasons) We now have: JAX: --- --- --- --- NYJ CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF --- HOU --- NYJ CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI --- LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- GBP CFT --- --- With PHI going to Brazil, I see that as ideal for an NFC v AFC game, so they get CFT. And that leaves NYJ as the only team JAX can host. We now have JAX: --- --- --- --- NYJ --- --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF --- HOU --- --- CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI --- LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- --- CFT --- --- The only AFC opponents for CAR are LAC and CIN. LAC would fly from West Coast, CIN is a desired "Game 17" opponent. That one seems simple. MIN can host HOU (AFC, preferred) or an NFC team from the West. That one also seems simple. We're left with: JAX: --- --- --- --- NYJ --- --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- --- --- --- HOU --- --- CAR: --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- --- CFT --- --- I know JAX *could* play CHI and get the back-to-back London games like in 2023. But LAR haven't played Internationally since 2019 (SEA was 2022), so even though it might make more sense for CHI to draw JAX (AFC), my guts tell me the NFL would prefer the higher-profile Rams in London. This makes the games: Wembley: Jets at Jaguars Spurs: Rams at Bears / Texans at Vikings Allianz (Munich): Bengals at Panthers Sau Paulo Brazil: Current Browns at Eagles Of course, Jags at Bears (Spurs) would be okay too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 7 Report Share Posted March 7 For the record, here are the last international dates for all 32 teams: 2023: ATL BAL BUF IND JAX KCC MIA NEP TEN 2022: ARI DEN GBP MIN NOS NYG SFF SEA TBB 2021: NYJ 2020: --- 2019: CAR CHI CIN HOU LAC LAR LVR 2018: PHI 2017: CFT 2016: WAS 2015: DET 2014: DAL 2013: PIT Another way of looking at the JAX/PHI opponents is that at least one of NYJ/GBP will be tapped, as CFT can't play in both games. NYJ hasn't been in 3 seasons, GBP went 2 seasons ago, so for "fairness" that makes more sense, which only reiterates CFT playing at PHI (in Brazil). Of course, the league could decide to throw divisional balance out the window and have PHI play an NFC-E opponent, or fill Tottenham stadium with back-to-back NFC-N games, or something equally as stupid. But unless there are some behind-the-scene deals being made (which I don't for a moment doubt there are), the parings I have settled upon seem to make the most sense.... which is why I'm certain they're all wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 25 Report Share Posted March 25 Current "acknowledged" processing time from the State Department for issuance of new Passports is 6-8 weeks. Experience has shown that they under-estimate fairly regularly to avoid looking like total schmucks, and to generate extra revenue when people freak out and pay for last-minute "expedited" service. Realisitically, once your application is completed, your photo taken, and everything is double-checked and paid-for at your local full-service Post Office, you should get your Passport within 9-12 weeks. Possibly sooner, but generally not. Nerdwallet recommends applying no less than 6 months before you need it, as they're reporting that State is "warning of massive delays". State is recommending submitting the paperwork three months before you need the Passport, which by the +50% rule, means 4-1/2 months, minimum. If the game is in late October and you believe State, with the +50%, then you should apply by early June. If you don't believe State, you should apply by mid April..... or, to put it another way.... immediately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 27 Report Share Posted March 27 CFT-PHI will not be in Brazil. This makes GBP-PHI the leading candidate for Brazil, assuming no intra-divisional game and no team traveling in consecutive seasons. I'll redo the full analysis today, and I expect there will be some impact to the other International pairings, but I don't think this affects the likelihood of CIN-CAR significantly. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 27 Report Share Posted March 27 Of course the term "Season Opener" here could mean the first Friday Night game of the season, not necessarily the first game of the entire season. But even if that were the case and this game were mid-season, I doubt the league would make teams fly to Brazil for a Friday game, taking two days' rest off the table in a game the NFL wants to use to showcase their product and expand into a new market. The only way I see CFT-PHI as still being Brazil is if both got a bye the week prior.... long but not impossible odds. In spite of all of that, I view this announcement as taking CFT-PHI out of Brazil and will find new International pairings as a result. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 27 Report Share Posted March 27 Hold the presses! I just stumbled across this! Linky: https://sports.yahoo.com/either-packers-browns-play-eagles-175114816.html "Either Packers or Browns will play Eagles in Brazil for Week 1 of 2024 season Zach Kruse Tue, Mar 26, 2024" So, PHI is opening their season in Brazil, and based on the earlier tweet they're playing CFT. And since it's Week One, no "loss of rest" issues since neither have a game before and both will have 2 extra days after. So CFT-PHI looks close to a lock if the leak is accurate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted March 27 Report Share Posted March 27 Updating: Wembley: Jets at Jaguars Spurs: Rams at Bears / Texans at Vikings Allianz (Munich): Bengals at Panthers Sau Paulo Brazil: Current Browns at Eagles (Week 1 Friday, seemingly confirmed) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griever Posted April 3 Report Share Posted April 3 (May be paywalled by the time some of you read this, sorry) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 And the "seeming confirmation" just got flipped. NFL announced today that the Brazil opener will be Packers-Eagles. I'm off to see what the knock-on effect - if any - this may have on the European games and on our possible Munich visit. Stand by. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 Okay, let's take this from the top: My assumptions are: 1 - Except for JAX, no team will play TWO international games. 2 - If JAX plays two, they will be back-to-back and BOTH must be in London (like 2023) 3 - Divisional games are not desired (though they have happened) 4 - Cross-conference games are desired as they don't impact tiebreakers as much. 5 - Games against a team's previously-unscheduled "Game 17" opponent are highly desired as the visitor still plays 8 domestic road games, including every team already on their schedule due to rotation. 6 - NFC hosts against PIT and AFC hosts against GBP or DAL are unlikely (those home teams likely want the extra revenue that the visiting bandwagon will bring, and they only get one shot at that money every 8 seasons). Here are the 'home' games each of the locked-in International Series teams will play: JAX: HOU IND TEN NEP NYJ CFT GBP MIN CHI: DET GBP MIN LAR SEA CAR JAX TEN NEP MIN: CHI DET GBP ARI SFF ATL HOU IND NYJ CAR: ATL NOS TBB DAL NYG ARI KCC LAC CIN PHI: DAL NYG WAS ATL CAR GBP CFT PIT JAX The first three are division opponents The next three are conference opponents The next two are cross-conference opponents (desired under assumption 4) These are ITALIC The ninth one (if there is one) is the "Game 17" opponent (highly desired under assmuption 5) These are UNDERLINED If we throw out CHI/MIN/CAR/PHI as a visiting international team (assumption 1), non-London JAX-as-a-visitor (assumption 2), division opponents (assumption 3), and NFC/PIT AFC/GBP/DAL (assumption 6), we're left with: JAX: --- --- --- NEP NYJ CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX TEN NEP MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF ATL HOU IND NYJ CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI KCC LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- ATL --- GBP CFT --- --- The following teams played Internationally last year - I see no way they'll go again this year: NEP KCC BAL ATL MIA TEN IND BUF (I've taken JAX off this list, for obvious reasons) We now have: JAX: --- --- --- --- NYJ CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF --- HOU --- NYJ CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI --- LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- GBP CFT --- --- With GBP-PHI confirmed for Brazil, we have: JAX: --- --- --- --- NYJ CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF --- HOU --- NYJ CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI --- LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- GBP --- --- --- JAX has only two opponents on the board, NYJ and CFT. NYJ is also a highly-preferred opponent for MIN's game. Frankly, with CFT (2017) not having played overseas for 4 years longer than the last NYJ trip (2021), I view CFT-JAX as a more likely paring than NYJ-JAX, which still leaves NYJ available for MIN. JAX: --- --- --- --- --- CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- ARI SFF --- HOU --- NYJ CAR: --- --- --- DAL NYG ARI --- LAC CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- GBP --- --- --- This leaves CAR's situaton unchanged from before. Their only AFC opponents are LAC/CIN, LAC is flying from the West Cost while CIN is a desired "Game 17" opponent, so again it looks like CIN-CAR makes the most sense, MIN can host either HOU or NYJ... HOU hasn't been since 2019, NYJ in 2021, so HOU now seems re-confirmed as MIN's most likely opponent. JAX: --- --- --- --- --- CFT --- --- CHI: --- --- --- LAR SEA --- JAX --- --- MIN: --- --- --- --- --- --- HOU --- --- CAR: --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- CIN PHI: --- --- --- --- --- GBP --- --- --- And as before, I know JAX *could* play CHI and get the back-to-back London games like in 2023. But LAR haven't played Internationally since 2019 (SEA was 2022), so even though it might make more sense for CHI to draw JAX (AFC), my guts tell me the NFL would prefer the higher-profile Rams in London. This makes the games: Wembley: Current Browns at Jaguars Spurs: Rams at Bears / Texans at Vikings Allianz (Munich): Bengals at Panthers Sau Paulo Brazil: Packers at Eagles Of course, Jags at Bears (Spurs) or Jets at Vikings (Wembley) would all make sense too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted April 10 Report Share Posted April 10 Bengals are more popular than half the NFL teams in Brazil ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishBengalFan Posted May 4 Report Share Posted May 4 Two years ago - 2022 - the dudes on Park Avenue announced the International Series games on May 4th. That was a Wednesday. Last year, the announcement was on May 10th, also on a Wednesday. If that schedule holds, we should be about 96 hours away from an announcement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.