Elijah15 Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Like seriously? i have nothing against standeford but why in the world would u just disrespect your all time leading reciever by giving away his number like it wasnt nothing. I know some of u guys hate chad but atleast hes one of the reasons why we even sniffed spotlight or fucking primetime... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nati Ice Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 LOL WTF are you talking about. The man is not immortal and he was a team cancer. In spite of what he thinks about himself, he is not that special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Isaac Curtis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigris Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 It doesn't bother me. I keep seeing Harnande (or whatever his name is) Jones and JJ out there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTBengalsFan Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 He's not on the team anymore.... why wouldn't they give it out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MULLY Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Nati Ice' timestamp='1313200071' post='1014840'] LOL WTF are you talking about. The man is not immortal and he was a team cancer. In spite of what he thinks about himself, he is not that special. [/quote] I believe he holds the majority of the Bengals receiving records so yeah, he is that special. They could have waited a season to give someone that number. MULLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah15 Posted August 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Fulcher_33' timestamp='1313200478' post='1014852'] I believe he holds the majority of the Bengals receiving records so yeah, he is that special. They could have waited a season to give someone that number. MULLY [/quote] thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MULLY Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='CTBengalsFan' timestamp='1313200457' post='1014850'] He's not on the team anymore.... why wouldn't they give it out? [/quote] I don't think anyone, including myself, is enough of a Chad homer to think they should retire that number. But a one season layoff wouldn't hurt, or at least don't give it to a fucking scrub. MULLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sois Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Elijah15' timestamp='1313199751' post='1014833'] Like seriously? i have nothing against standeford but why in the world would u just disrespect your all time leading reciever by giving away his number like it wasnt nothing. I know some of u guys hate chad but atleast hes one of the reasons why we even sniffed spotlight or fucking primetime... [/quote] That makes me a bit upset. I'm also upset about Dalton getting #14. What # is Gradshitski wearing? If he has #7 I will pretty much want to hope James Harrison kills him on the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nati Ice Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Fulcher_33' timestamp='1313200478' post='1014852'] I believe he holds the majority of the Bengals receiving records so yeah, he is that special. They could have waited a season to give someone that number. MULLY [/quote] No. That is not how the game works. And that is certainly not how the Bengals operate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschooler Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 I am not upset by it at all. And I am so not upset that I won't even bother responding to this thread. Oh wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cincity Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Right now with more players in training camp, numbers are at a premium.. There isn't room to not put Chad's number back in rotation, better to give him a number that is not being used as opposed to doubling up someone's number.. The Eagles were doubling numbers last night, McCoy's #25 jersey was being used by someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nati Ice Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Fulcher_33' timestamp='1313200589' post='1014858'] I don't think anyone, including myself, is enough of a Chad homer to think they should retire that number. But a one season layoff wouldn't hurt, or at least don't give it to a fucking scrub. MULLY [/quote] It is the pre season. There are only so many numbers. Hell last I checked there were like 3 people with 43 or something. And what do you want them to do in regards to handing it out to a non-scrub? Give it to AJ? That seems like an even bigger smack in the face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoCommando Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 I don't like it too much either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sois Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Just use three digits, what would be so wrong with that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Who gives a shit... Chad wanted out two years ago... He got it now.... Use the number... Thanks for the years.... See ya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah15 Posted August 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Lol u guys are chad johnson haters, sure i dont like the way his last years as a bengal were but atleast show him some respect. Might as well give out chris henry's number to a scrub too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Fulcher_33' timestamp='1313200478' post='1014852'] I believe he holds the majority of the Bengals receiving records so yeah, he is that special. They could have waited a season to give someone that number. MULLY [/quote] There were only 3 numbers they could have given him by NFL rules: 82 85 15 and frankly, IMO Kelly deserves his number preserved for a year more than Chad did. The other option was Henry's old number. Regardless, it was Isaac Curtis' number long before it was ever Chad's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USN Bengal Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Elijah15' timestamp='1313201424' post='1014904'] Lol u guys are chad johnson haters, sure i dont like the way his last years as a bengal were but atleast show him some respect. Might as well give out chris henry's number to a scrub too [/quote] You're totally wrong Elijah... I think everyone loved Chad Johnson. Chad OchoStinko, by his own admission, did NOT give it his all for the last four years. I think that because of that, he DESERVED to have 85 given to a FA pick-up. Chad is a quitter just like Carson. Can't argue the facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T.O.C.H.O SHOW Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 i love chad but really its just a number. its not like the number is getting retired anyway which is kinda pointless too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalsOwn Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 The Bengals are pathetic when it comes to honoring their great players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sois Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='USN Bengal' timestamp='1313201676' post='1014915'] You're totally wrong Elijah... I think everyone loved Chad Johnson. [b]Chad OchoStinko, by his own admission, did NOT give it his all for the last four years. I think that because of that, he DESERVED to have 85 given to a FA pick-up. [/b] Chad is a quitter just like Carson. Can't argue the facts. [/quote] That makes me hate Marvin and soP more than it does make me hate Chad. Fix the shit ASAP, don't let it linger four years. Good on soP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elijah15 Posted August 13, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 Lol but that number was his brand... he made the #85 be known, atleast keep it away from someone for atleast a year or 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cincity Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 [quote name='Elijah15' timestamp='1313201972' post='1014927'] Lol but that number was his brand... he made the #85 be known, atleast keep it away from someone for atleast a year or 2 [/quote] It was CHAD's brand... Not the Bengals. Chad isn't on the team anymore. Sorry bruh.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted August 13, 2011 Report Share Posted August 13, 2011 this should be a poll. Who's number would you rather Standeford have? Chad's, Henry's or Reggie Kelly's. I bet Chad gets the most votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.