Jump to content

Tracking Joe's four  

25 members have voted

  1. 1. Who gets a new contract?

    • Ja'marr Chase
      25
    • Mike Gesicki
      14
    • Trey Hendrickson
      15
    • Tee Higgins
      10


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Griever said:

Idk what this means, maybe Tee is going to the Chicago Cubs

 

 

 

In current slang the hat means "cap", as in "You're not telling the truth". Hence the phrase "no cap" to mean "I'm telling the truth".

 

In the context of the Bengals, hopefully Tee isn't basically saying that Duke is lying in his press conference. 

  • Upvote 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, BlackJesus said:

 

In current slang the hat means "cap", as in "You're not telling the truth". Hence the phrase "no cap" to mean "I'm telling the truth".

 

In the context of the Bengals, hopefully Tee isn't basically saying that Duke is lying in his press conference. 

If he is talking about the team…

Posted
8 hours ago, BlackJesus said:

 

In current slang the hat means "cap", as in "You're not telling the truth". Hence the phrase "no cap" to mean "I'm telling the truth".

 

In the context of the Bengals, hopefully Tee isn't basically saying that Duke is lying in his press conference. 

Thank you sir. As you can see... I am not hip

 

2ce8e1a057c3be5be6dcc57815dfd181.gif

  • Upvote 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Griever said:

Idk what this means, maybe Tee is going to the Chicago Cubs

 

 

 

Its gen z language. "Cap" means your lying. So he's responding to someone saying they are lying. No idea who. I don't think it's Tobin because his mom said the other week that her "cheap asses" tweet wasn't about the Bengals.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Trey has the least amount of leverage as he's under contract next year for a cheap rate. 

 

I could see the Bengals telling him he has to play it out if he asks for something huge like 35 mill a year. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, BlackJesus said:

Trey has the least amount of leverage as he's under contract next year for a cheap rate. 

 

I could see the Bengals telling him he has to play it out if he asks for something huge like 35 mill a year. 


The other variable is the change in defensive coordinators…with a possible change to a 4-3 base instead of a 5-2.  Will Trey be less effective in that alignment (I’m thinking, “yes”)?  
 

It might make a lot of sense to trade him…depending, of course, on what might be offered in exchange.

Posted
8 hours ago, sparky151 said:

I think he's replying to Duke. Last year the Bengals tagged Tee but didn't offer him a multi-year deal. This year Tobin is saying they will get it done. Maybe. 

Duke would love to sign all 3.

Who wouldn't?

He can pump up the idea of retaining them with hopes the front office 

doing their due diligence to make it happen.

Katy is much aware of this.

 

Do it.....

Posted
16 hours ago, claptonrocks said:

Duke would love to sign all 3.

Who wouldn't?

He can pump up the idea of retaining them with hopes the front office 

doing their due diligence to make it happen.

Katy is much aware of this.

 

Do it.....

 

Sounds like they are furthest from a new deal with Trey. The team is pretty fearful of making substantial spending commitments, even for proven players. If they were better at structuring contracts, they could get out of them without significant damage after a year or two.

Posted

My prediction right now would be that the Bengals extend Ja'Marr and Tee and tell Trey his price is too high, so he will have to play out his last year. I then could see Trey saying he will just not play at all then. 

 

I hope I'm wrong though. 

Posted

I could see Trey asking for a trade and the team agreeing. But this is a good draft for DEs so the trade compensation might not be a lot. We could probably get a 2nd and maybe us it on Ashton Gilotte or Princely Umamielen or similar players. Unless we sign Josh Sweat, that would be a poor exchange for us.

 

Posted

Random thought...  They should get Tee's contract done before the tag deadline, just so they can transition tag Gesicki.

Posted

Tee's agent probably won't let him sign an extension before he's tagged. It would be a disservice to Tee. So tomorrow he gets tagged, then hopefully he's signed in the next week. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, sparky151 said:

Tee's agent probably won't let him sign an extension before he's tagged. It would be a disservice to Tee. So tomorrow he gets tagged, then hopefully he's signed in the next week. 

 

Yeah it allows other teams to make offers that Tee can use to ask the Bengals for, better for him to do that, better for the Bengals to get it done now so they arent fighting with other teams offers.

Posted

Players can only be tagged 3 times in their careers. A 3rd tag requires paying the highest franchise tag number, ie the QB level, so for other positions it's a max of 2 tags. So Arceneaux should wait until Tee is tagged before negotiating an extension. That will ensure Tee is truly free once his next contract expires. He could wait until the legal tampering period begins to see what other teams are offering. But Tee supposedly wants to stay in Cincinnati and the team wants to sign him. It should be easy enough to agree to a 3 or 4 year deal that averages more than the 26 mil tag number and has half the money guaranteed at signing.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...