Official 2019 Draft First Round Thread

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

[Jason 3,787]

Last pick of the night

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

[Jason 3,787]

So Lock, Greedy, Ford, and DK fall completely out of 1.

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

1 minute ago, Jason said:

So Lock, Greedy, Ford, and DK fall completely out of 1.

 

 

 

Paris Campbell too

[|kennethmw| 1,258]

1 hour ago, Jason said:

Who?

Mack Wilson.

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

 

 

 

 

Good night. Peace

 

 

 

[T-Dub 7,069]

Would be fine with another OT if that's how it goes.

[snarkster 258]

OC Price / Hopkins / Lundblade

OG Boling / Miller / Taylor

OG Glenn / Redmond / Westerman

OT Taylor / Hart

OT Williams / Perkins

 

Tempting, but Rds 3-5 would have to go toward the D.  Would probably need to find a quality LB in post-draft FA or the camp waiver wire.  

 

[|High School Harry| 2,628]

Not only ecstatic with the pick ... pick of the litter, best OT in the draft but

also who we passed on to get him: Gary, Haskins (although I wish him well in Wash) and Sweat (with the heart condition).

 

The last nail in the coffin of the Marvin Era where shitty picks were the norm.

 

On to Round Two.

 

[JC 1,317]

6 hours ago, T-Dub said:

Would be fine with another OT if that's how it goes.

 

Im with ya. Risner would be my guy. Seems like they might get it right this time and could end up making it a super strength rather than absolute liability.

 

Pretty bummed a lot if those defensive linemen are gone. Was hoping with the depth a guy like Tillery would fall to us in two.

[membengal 1,273]

7 hours ago, kennethmw said:

Mack Wilson.

I think hes gonna be awful in the pros.

[|kennethmw| 1,258]

11 minutes ago, membengal said:

I think hes gonna be awful in the pros.

Most sources see him as the third best LB in the draft.  If he's there,  I'd take him. 

[-oldschooler- 5,207]

11 minutes ago, kennethmw said:

Most sources see him as the third best LB in the draft.  If he's there,  I'd take him. 

 

 

 

I wouldn't be upset. But I like Blake Cashman more.

[membengal 1,273]

1 hour ago, kennethmw said:

Most sources see him as the third best LB in the draft.  If he's there,  I'd take him. 

He's Paul Dawson. 

[Jamie_B 3,041]

8 hours ago, oldschooler said:

 

I know the D still needs LBs but go get Jamie Collins and Zach Brown and get one of these guys to play RT and we are REALLY well off on the Oline.

[|kennethmw| 1,258]

1 hour ago, membengal said:

He's Paul Dawson. 

6 interceptions in 2 years says he's not.  

[Jason 3,787]

18 minutes ago, kennethmw said:

6 interceptions in 2 years says he's not.  

Dawson was a good college player too. 

[|kennethmw| 1,258]

40 minutes ago, Jason said:

Dawson was a good college player too. 

He was, but he wasn't a thinking LB.

https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/chicago-bears/nfl-draft-profile-tcu-ilb-paul-dawson

 

Here's what I could find on Mack Williams

 

https://www.nfl.com/prospects/mack-wilson?id=32195749-4c74-7169-f251-e69c40d45765

 

[membengal 1,273]

Mack Wilson is slow are fuck. Just, why, in today's NFL, should the Bengals be taking in round 2 a LBer who is slow? And not a particularly good tackler either. Just, NO. 

[I_C_Deadpeople 107]

I have seen a few sites that are high on the LB from NC, Germaine Pratt. Anyone know anything about him?