Jump to content

Republicans


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Jamie_B said:

 

 

Socialism is a scareword they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years.

 

 

Like "libertarian", "fascist" or "conservative/liberal" it's been washed of any consensus meaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, T-Dub said:

 

 

Yes, and she will likely be someone with far more legal experience than, say, Amy Coney Barrett.  Or at the very least someone with a law degree and a long tenure as a federal judge.

 

She will almost certainly NOT be a high-priced call girl from a sugardaddy website.

 

This is not about "grooming candidates based on demographics".  (LOL!)   It's about hiring actual prostitutes to shill a hate-filled & idiotic agenda.

Again, really REALLY not the same thing.

 

 

Did the President of the United States promise the country his first Supreme Court nominee would have a certain skin color and be a certain sex?  It is a Yes or No answer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SF2 said:

Did the President of the United States promise the country his first Supreme Court nominee would have a certain skin color and be a certain sex?  It is a Yes or No answer.  

 

Is this red herring red and does it smell like fish?  I'm sorry what does that have to do with hiring prostitutes to run for office?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Jamie_B said:

 

Ah so the 2nd one. 

 

Hilarious

No, I responded to your comment and you proceeded to deflect. I don’t call them socialists, they call themselves that.  If you want to pretend people who call themselves socialist are not really socialist you need to take it up with them, not me. 
 

Here is there website.  Pretty much socialists.  
 

https://justicedemocrats.com/platform/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, T-Dub said:

 

Is this red herring red and does it smell like fish?  I'm sorry what does that have to do with hiring prostitutes to run for office?

More deflection.  Why is skin color and sexual preferences so important to the left? 
 


"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."  Dr. Martin Luther King. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, SF2 said:

More deflection.  Why is skin color and sexual preferences so important to the left? 
 


"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."  Dr. Martin Luther King. 

 

Ahh, The Proverbial Caucasian attempt to use Dr. King as a reason for not extending the American franchise to African Americans.  That AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMAN is More qualified than EVERY OTHER SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Republican or Democratic on the Supreme Court!!  and she makes the LAST three look like Jr. Law Clerks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, SF2 said:

No, I responded to your comment and you proceeded to deflect. I don’t call them socialists, they call themselves that.  If you want to pretend people who call themselves socialist are not really socialist you need to take it up with them, not me. 
 

Here is there website.  Pretty much socialists.  
 

https://justicedemocrats.com/platform/

 

 

See the source image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, SF2 said:

More deflection.  Why is skin color and sexual preferences so important to the left? 
 


"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."  Dr. Martin Luther King. 

 

 

 

I mean as long as we are quoting King....

 

 

Consider King’s words in a letter to Coretta Scott in 1952: “I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic,” he wrote, adding that capitalism had “out-lived its usefulness” because it had “brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, kennethmw said:

Ahh, The Proverbial Caucasian attempt to use Dr. King as a reason for not extending the American franchise to African Americans.  That AFRICAN AMERICAN WOMAN is More qualified than EVERY OTHER SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Republican or Democratic on the Supreme Court!!  and she makes the LAST three look like Jr. Law Clerks. 

 

Sad fact is if you see an MLK Jr quote these days it's probably being weaponized by a white guy.  It's super fun when people get upset about BLM blocking traffic and then bring him up like the Edmund Pettus Bridge was some kind of picnic.  

 

"In the final analysis, a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it that America has failed to hear?"

 

There's one that doesn't get quoted much.  Wonder why?  Let's weaponize that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm gonna get real upset about the President saying he would nominate a black woman and ignore the fact that Trump was so obviously going to default nominate white people that he didn't need to say it out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SF2 said:

More deflection.  Why is skin color and sexual preferences so important to the left? 
 

 

 

WTF do you mean "more deflection" when you're the one desperately trying to change the subject?

 

But OK, since you seem so confused by it: Because the far right are religious fanatic & white supremacists, and they continue to do everything in their power to persecute and disenfranchise people based on skin color and sexual preference.

 

So really, it's more like why is skin color and sexual preference so important to the right?  Maybe because racism and Christian fundamentalism are the only way they can convince poor & uneducated whites to vote against their own self interest?

 

"Geez why can't you people just shut up and be oppressed, I'm trying to watch Wheel of Fortune over here!"  FOH with that nonsense.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

 

 

I mean as long as we are quoting King....

 

 

Consider King’s words in a letter to Coretta Scott in 1952: “I am much more socialistic in my economic theory than capitalistic,” he wrote, adding that capitalism had “out-lived its usefulness” because it had “brought about a system that takes necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes.”

 

5 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

 

 

See the source image

You need to take it up with the self proclaimed socialists, not me. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SF2 said:

 

You need to take it up with the self proclaimed socialists, not me. 

 

Except none of the stuff you quoted in that platform even talks about state ownership of the means of production, so again as inigo montoya said....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, SF2 said:

 

You need to take it up with the self proclaimed socialists, not me. 

 

Ooh, see, that's not going to be an option in this case because the FBI conspired with local police to shoot him dead on April 4th, 1968.

 

Let's assume that something like affordable health care was only the tip of the iceberg. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Faux News and all of their collective "contributors" were losing their collective minds last night. All the usual suspects were whining about this-Lara Trump, Eric Trump, Jim Jordan, Marc Levin, and others. They were calling it the "end of democracy" and 'weaponizing the FBI and DOJ" amongst other things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jamie_B said:

Yeah the whole "If they can do this to a former President, imagine what they can do to you."

 

Well unless you are taking classified documents out of the White House I think you're safe.

 

 

It's the fucking FBI we're talking about.  Did anyone other than Shitler himself think they were safe from their reach?  Just when I think these people couldn't be any stupider.

 

 

Saw Marjorie Traitor-Green called the FBI "antifa" which is great.   Yes, antifascism is *good*.  Antifa is good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, T-Dub said:

 

 

It's the fucking FBI we're talking about.  Did anyone other than Shitler himself think they were safe from their reach?  Just when I think these people couldn't be any stupider.

 

 

Saw Marjorie Traitor-Green called the FBI "antifa" which is great.   Yes, antifascism is *good*.  Antifa is good.

 

 

 

The dumb bitch then went on to say defund the FBII

 

But without a hint of irony you talk about defund the police and her head would explode

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...