spicoli Posted February 16, 2023 Report Posted February 16, 2023 2 hours ago, claptonrocks said: ""too light crap" are your words not mine. I said he was ."maybe to small".. 6'0 280lbs.. Have you ever watched any tape on the kid? Just curious.
claptonrocks Posted February 16, 2023 Report Posted February 16, 2023 54 minutes ago, spicoli said: Have you ever watched any tape on the kid? Just curious. No but I will now. I want to see how he does against other possible prospects ..
spicoli Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 Kid’s a freak show. A lot of similarities to Donald when he was coming out of the same program. Hard not to compare the two.
claptonrocks Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 7 hours ago, membengal said: I see his quickness but who's he up against..A potential draft pick? Hell all players have highlight film.. Is a 3tech our most pressing need?.. I thought the plan was to build a better Oline...
membengal Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 AH, so your issue is you are locked into o-line in the first round and if other names are discussed you are gonna diss them to fit that agenda. Got it.
claptonrocks Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, membengal said: AH, so your issue is you are locked into o-line in the first round and if other names are discussed you are gonna diss them to fit that agenda. Got it. No ..you haven't got it at all. I would be ok with a priority need but 3tech isn't one of them..
spicoli Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 22 minutes ago, claptonrocks said: I would be ok with a priority need but 3tech isn't one of them The only way they’d ever have a shot at Kancey is by trading up into the top half of the first round. We all know that isn’t happening, so it’s all moot anyway.
membengal Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 What's weird is pretending there is not a need at 3T. And going out of one's way to slag a likely top 15 prospect to further an agenda.
claptonrocks Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 3 minutes ago, membengal said: What's weird is pretending there is not a need at 3T. And going out of one's way to slag a likely top 15 prospect to further an agenda. We have BJ Hill and isnt Zach Carter being used there as well? Like Spicoli said if he's a top 15 no shot anyway..
I_C_Deadpeople Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 I would say that if a player (excluding QB) that was ranked top 15 on the Bengals board was there when we pick- he would be selected regardless of position. And there would be no doubt about taking him.
spicoli Posted February 17, 2023 Report Posted February 17, 2023 1 hour ago, membengal said: What's weird is pretending there is not a need at 3T. And going out of one's way to slag a likely top 15 prospect to further an agenda. Yeah
claptonrocks Posted February 18, 2023 Report Posted February 18, 2023 6 hours ago, membengal said: Hopefully our future RT.. Big long nasty.. He and Cappa would solidify the right side..
gupps Posted February 18, 2023 Report Posted February 18, 2023 22 hours ago, I_C_Deadpeople said: I would say that if a player (excluding QB) that was ranked top 15 on the Bengals board was there when we pick- he would be selected regardless of position. And there would be no doubt about taking him. Semi agree, Someone could always make a kickass trade offer.
sparky151 Posted February 18, 2023 Report Posted February 18, 2023 I doubt Kancey is going in the top 15. Most mocks I've seen don't even have him in the first round, meaning he'd be available for selection at 29. But he'd be a terrible pick for us. We're not going to bench or cut Hill and we just used a day 2 pick last year on the backup. Kancey's production isn't close to Donald's. And we certainly have bigger areas of need, not all of which will be filled in free agency.
I_C_Deadpeople Posted February 18, 2023 Report Posted February 18, 2023 1 hour ago, gupps said: Semi agree, Someone could always make a kickass trade offer. Again though, they likely would turn down any trade offer if they had a top 15 player sitting at the end of round 1.
sparky151 Posted February 20, 2023 Report Posted February 20, 2023 You guys ought to sober up if you think Kancey is anywhere close to Donald. Donald had 28.5 tackles for loss his senior year with 4 fumbles forced and 3 passes defensed. Kancey had 7 sacks, 0 fumbles forced or recovered and 0 passes defended. Not even close to the same ballpark. Just because they went to the same college doesn't make them alike. Jeez. There's a reason Donald won the Lombardi, Nagurski, Bednarik, and Outland trophies and Kancey didn't.
|kennethmw| Posted February 20, 2023 Report Posted February 20, 2023 On 2/16/2023 at 12:45 PM, Jungletiger said: Left field take and random reminder. I understand letting go of the disrespect card and all that, but as we get praises from analysts never forget what was said. That aged well, didn't it?😂😂😂😂😂
|High School Harry| Posted February 20, 2023 Report Posted February 20, 2023 https://www.cincyjungle.com/2023/2/19/23599419/bengals-3-round-mock-draft-cody-mauch That means there will likely be an even bigger emphasis on the draft for Bengals fans. Chad Reuter from NFL.com gave us his first mock draft of the year. Cody Mauch, Offensive lineman North Dakota Mauch showed during Senior Bowl week that he could play anywhere along the offensive line. That sort of versatility would have come in handy for the Bengals during the playoffs after they lost both starting tackles (including Jonah Williams, a free agent after the 2023 season) to injury. Putting Mauch and his former Bison teammate, Cordell Volson, on the same NFL O-line does NDSU proud. Mauch went viral for a minute on Bengals Twitter when his team picture with him missing teeth was shared as him being a former teammate of Volson. It shows off that glass-eating mentality that offensive line coach Frank Pollack looks for. ********* Second round for sure************
stan Posted February 20, 2023 Report Posted February 20, 2023 12 hours ago, kennethmw said: That aged well, didn't it?😂😂😂😂😂 Most of the comments were Colin Cowherd and Dan Patrick.There was also one by Milke Golic, and someone, whose voice I didn't recognize.Patrick,Cowherd and Golic ,all worked for ESPN.They did not like the Bengals,and trashed them all the time.
BengalBuck Posted February 21, 2023 Report Posted February 21, 2023 8 hours ago, stan said: Most of the comments were Colin Cowherd and Dan Patrick.There was also one by Milke Golic, and someone, whose voice I didn't recognize.Patrick,Cowherd and Golic ,all worked for ESPN.They did not like the Bengals,and trashed them all the time. Dan Patrick is actually a Bengals fan. I think he goes over the top to avoid that appearance.
I_C_Deadpeople Posted February 21, 2023 Report Posted February 21, 2023 2023 NFL Draft Consensus Big Board 3.0: Which prospects crack the top 100? Nick Baumgardner and Austin Mock Feb 21, 2023 12 The Athletic’s Consensus Big Board combines rankings from a wide range of draft experts to identify how the top prospects are viewed against the rest of the 2023 draft class. In theory, by the time we reach draft weekend, we’ll have a good handle on how the picks could (or, at least, should) fall. For the third version of our board, Austin Mock again gives us a look at how the top 100 prospects stack up across the industry. Included in this update is the latest set of rankings from The Athletic draft expert Dane Brugler, which published on Feb. 14. The 2023 NFL Draft Consensus Big Board, 3.0 (including each player’s average ranking across all sources): Consensus Top-100 Big Board (Feb. 21) PLAYER POS. SCHOOL AVG. RANK 1 Will Anderson Jr. EDGE Alabama 1.5 2 Jalen Carter DT Georgia 2.8 3 Bryce Young QB Alabama 3.5 4 C.J. Stroud QB Ohio State 4.5 5 Myles Murphy EDGE Clemson 7.6 6 Peter Skoronski OT Northwestern 9.8 7 Bijan Robinson RB Texas 10.1 8 Quentin Johnston WR TCU 11.8 9 Jordan Addison WR USC 14.1 10 Michael Mayer TE Notre Dame 14.1 11 Tyree Wilson EDGE Texas Tech 14.6 12 Paris Johnson Jr. OT Ohio State 16.7 13 Jaxon Smith-Njigba WR Ohio State 18.7 14 Joey Porter Jr. CB Penn State 18.9 15 Bryan Bresee DT Clemson 20.1 16 Christian Gonzalez CB Oregon 20.7 17 Brian Branch S Alabama 21.0 18 Cam Smith CB South Carolina 23.5 19 Will Levis QB Kentucky 24.8 20 Jahmyr Gibbs RB Alabama 28.9 21 Broderick Jones OT Georgia 29.2 22 Kelee Ringo CB Georgia 31.0 23 Antonio Johnson S Texas A&M 31.5 24 Isaiah Foskey EDGE Notre Dame 32.3 25 Trenton Simpson LB Clemson 32.5 26 Devon Witherspoon CB Illinois 35.5 27 O'Cyrus Torrence G Florida 35.9 28 Anton Harrison OT Oklahoma 36.6 29 B.J. Ojulari EDGE LSU 37.1 30 Anthony Richardson QB Florida 39.7 31 Dalton Kincaid TE Utah 40.2 32 Siaki Ika DT Baylor 43.4 33 Dawand Jones OT Ohio State 44.3 34 Nolan Smith EDGE Georgia 45.4 35 Felix Anudike-Uzomah EDGE Kansas State 45.5 36 Josh Downs WR North Carolina 46.8 37 Lukas Van Ness DT Iowa 48.6 38 Clark Phillips III CB Utah 49.5 39 Emmanuel Forbes CB Mississippi State 49.5 40 Drew Sanders LB Alabama 51.0 41 Zay Flowers WR Boston College 51.5 42 Will McDonald IV EDGE Iowa State 52.2 43 Andre Carter II EDGE Army 52.2 44 Darnell Wright OT Tennessee 53.0 45 John Michael Schmitz C Minnesota 53.1 46 Luke Musgrave TE Oregon State 53.1 47 Jaylin Hyatt WR Tennessee 53.9 48 Darnell Washington TE Georgia 55.3 49 Gervon Dexter Sr. DT Florida 55.6 50 Kayshon Boutte WR LSU 55.6 51 Noah Sewell LB Oregon 58.3 52 Tuli Tuipulotu DT USC 59.8 53 Matthew Bergeron OT Syracuse 60.8 54 Mazi Smith DT Michigan 62.1 55 Devon Achane RB Texas A&M 62.5 56 Jordan Battle S Alabama 62.5 57 Rashee Rice WR SMU 65.0 58 Cody Mauch OT No. Dakota State 65.9 59 Calijah Kancey DT Pitt 66.2 60 Zach Harrison EDGE Ohio State 66.6 61 Derick Hall EDGE Auburn 66.9 62 Tanner McKee QB Stanford 68.3 63 Jack Campbell LB Iowa 69.0 64 Deonte Banks CB Maryland 69.1 65 Christopher Smith II S Georgia 69.9 66 Garrett Williams CB Syracuse 70.9 67 Tyrique Stevenson CB Miami (FL) 71.5 68 Steve Avila OL TCU 71.7 69 Henry To'o To'o LB Alabama 72.6 70 Jaelyn Duncan OT Maryland 73.1 71 Hendon Hooker QB Tennessee 73.5 72 Zach Charbonnet RB UCLA 74.2 73 Keion White DT Georgia Tech 74.2 74 Kyu Blu Kelly CB Stanford 75.1 75 Eli Ricks CB Alabama 75.8 76 JL Skinner S Boise State 77.5 77 Andrew Vorhees G USC 78.0 78 Sam LaPorta TE Iowa 78.1 79 Daiyan Henley LB Washington State 79.5 80 Tucker Kraft TE So. Dakota State 80.6 81 Zach Evans RB Ole Miss 80.6 82 Cedric Tillman WR Tennessee 81.2 83 Jaylon Jones CB Texas A&M 81.4 84 Keeanu Benton DT Wisconsin 82.5 85 Marvin Mims WR Oklahoma 82.6 86 Blake Freeland OT BYU 84.5 87 Adetomiwa Adebawore EDGE Northwestern 85.0 88 Nathaniel Dell WR Houston 85.2 89 Jaquelin Roy DT LSU 86.0 90 Dontayvion Wicks WR Virginia 86.5 91 Tre'Vius Hodges-Tomlinson CB TCU 87.7 92 Zacch Pickens DT South Carolina 88.0 93 Brandon Joseph S Notre Dame 88.1 94 Sean Tucker RB Syracuse 88.2 95 Luke Wypler C Ohio State 88.4 96 Sydney Brown S Illinois 88.5 97 Tyler Steen OT Alabama 88.6 98 Parker Washington WR Penn State 88.9 99 Tank Bigsby RB Auburn 89.3 100 Mekhi Garner CB LSU 89.3 Thoughts from The Athletic draft analyst Nick Baumgardner on the updated consensus board: The biggest risers in the top 75: Illinois CB Devon Witherspoon (No. 26, up 10) Ohio State OT Dawand Jones (No. 33, up 13) Iowa edge Lukas Van Ness (No. 37, up 13) Iowa State edge Will McDonald IV (No. 42, up 11) Tennessee OT Darnell Wright (No. 44, up 19) Oregon State TE Luke Musgrave (No. 46, up 14) Syracuse OT Matthew Bergeron (No. 53, up 22) Texas A&M RB Devon Achane (No. 55, up 11) Pitt DL Calijah Kancey (No. 59, up 19) Iowa LB Jack Campbell (No. 63, up 11) Georgia Tech DL Keion White (No. 73, up 23) A few things here: One, thanks to Dane for helping fix this version of the Big Board by getting more prospects into appropriate ranges. The consensus top 100 is not all the way there, but it’s getting closer in some areas. GO DEEPER Dane Brugler's updated NFL Draft rankings: The top 100 prospects in 2023 We talked last time about the likes of Witherspoon, Van Ness and Musgrave. All three are probably still ranked too low. Witherspoon is at least going to be in the conversation as the top cornerback on several NFL teams’ boards, while Van Ness will be a top-20 prospect for some and very well could be a first-round pick himself, despite a lack of production at Iowa. Musgrave, meantime, could flirt with the back half of Round 1 — he will be much higher on this list when we do it again after the combine (assuming he runs his 40-yard dash). In a similar vein, White jumped up 23 spots and that might not be enough. He is, at the very least, a top-50 player and possibly even a first-round pick. • The consensus board probably remains too high on several other prospects, including one on this “risers” list: Dawand Jones. His dominant one-day performance at the Senior Bowl no doubt bumped him up several boards. He was able to answer several questions NFL evaluators had about his mobility and overall foot speed vs. live pass rushers, but it’s important to note the tape on Jones still is what it is. Jones is No. 52 on Brugler’s latest big board, which is likely much closer to how NFL teams view him right now. Jones’ length is incredible, but can he hold up in every scheme? Will his balance and range be as usable at the next level? We’ll see. Another prospect I think the board is far too high on: Army edge Andre Carter. He struggled with power at the Senior Bowl and, despite his length and speed, appears as though he’ll have a long way to go vs. the run. ADVERTISEMENT • The board is too scared of quarterbacks Will Levis (Kentucky) and Anthony Richardson (Florida). Too many have gotten stuck on box-score scouting. Interceptions and completion rate in college matter — no one here will ever argue otherwise — but context on every single attempt in college also matters. A lot. QBs often are playing with receivers and lineman (and, in some cases, coaches) who are not NFL-caliber complements. Richardson and Levis have physical traits that are undeniable, and that will be true no matter how many times you saw them make poor throws on your television screens last season. Certainly, those traits will show up next week at the combine and at each player’s respective pro day. Dane’s current top 100 is closer to where this is going to shake out, with Levis at No. 10 and Richardson at No. 14. People should prepare themselves for four quarterbacks to be taken in the top half of the first round. GO DEEPER NFL Mock Draft: College football writers predict the first round • One more note on the quarterbacks: I’d guess the odds favor seeing just four quarterbacks in the top 100 (Bryce Young, C.J. Stroud, Levis and Richardson), rather than a scenario in which Stanford’s Tanner McKee (No. 62 on the consensus board) and Tennessee’s Hendon Hooker (No. 71) join them. Hooker could climb to that top-100 range on draft weekend, perhaps, but not sure I’d call it “likely.” • The board is still way too high on receivers and way too low on corners. Quentin Johnston stayed at No. 8 and Jordan Addison actually moved up two spots (to No. 9). Maybe the board knows better than me, but it’d be a bit surprising to see them selected there, when all is said and done. I also don’t think Jaxon Smith-Njigba (No. 13) will go in the top 15. We’ll see if the combine changes my mind, but I really doubt it. I don’t have as much of an issue with how the corners are stacked at the top, as that really depends on how you want your defense to play man coverage. That said, I don’t see zero corners coming off the board before the 14th pick (where Joey Porter Jr., is ranked on the consensus board), nor do I believe there are 15 players in this class better than Christian Gonzalez (No. 16). ADVERTISEMENT The board does have more confidence than Dane in Kelee Ringo (No. 22 here; No. 32 on Brugler’s board). On that, I side with the consensus. However, I’m right back to agreeing with Dane on South Carolina CB Cam Smith (No. 51 on Brugler’s board; No. 18 here). I like Smith, but I don’t believe he’s in the top four at his position. My ranking of that group, presently, would be: Gonzalez, Witherspoon, Porter, Ringo. GO DEEPER 2023 NFL Draft: Which prospects have been invited to the scouting combine? • The linebackers had some of the widest ranges on the Consensus Big Board, and that’s really no surprise. It’ll be like that throughout the entire draft process, because the league’s general consensus on what it believes to be a good stack linebacker is … well, it doesn’t exist. There are multiple schools of thought at a position that’s changing pretty constantly. That doesn’t diminish the position’s importance, though. On the contrary, good stack linebackers are still incredibly valuable and — like good running backs — smart general managers have shown in recent years that you can sit, wait and strike gold. Nick Bolton and Pete Werner were late second-round picks in 2021. The Lions got Malcolm Rodriguez in the sixth round last year. The Bears found a good one in undrafted rookie Jack Sanborn. Impact linebackers are out there, even if it’s not necessarily reflected in the top 100. (Illustration: Eamonn Dalton / The Athletic; photos: Randy Litzinger, Adam Davis, Nick Cammett / Getty Images) What did you think of this story?
Jamie_B Posted February 21, 2023 Author Report Posted February 21, 2023 Unless one of the corners drops to us, I think the pick is very likely to be Antion Harrison
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.