February 10, 20241 yr comment_1736511 10 hours ago, sparky151 said: Nonsense. Browning was a guy on the league's fringe for several years. When he got a chance, he played well. He was more efficient than a lot of other team's QBs such as Mayfield, Watson, Flacco, Carr, Fields, etc. Don't forget Pickett.
February 10, 20241 yr comment_1736559 14 hours ago, sparky151 said: That's a ....take, I guess. Pretty stupid one but go ahead and double down. Playing QB is mostly about decision-making and throwing accuracy. Browning has those. He's not a physical specimen but doesn't need to be. Lots of guys like that have succeeded in the NFL including one playing this weekend. In a league where teams started guys like Heinicke, Zappe, Simien, Beathard, Stidham, Ridder, O'Connell, Dobbs, etc, Browning has value. Maybe we saw his best ever football but even after there was tape of him, he continued to play well. He's 3 years away from UFA status while having been through 5 training camps. He's certainly a better bet than Tommy DeVito or whomever. NFL teams will give up decent compensation for a QB upgrade. Your argument that he can't take Chase and Higgins with him is silly as a new team will have their own receivers and those are easier to find than a solid QB. Nobody is giving a draft pick for Jake Browning. Nobody. You can cope as much as you’d like and try to convince yourself he’s a valuable piece to a franchise, but he’s simply a dime a dozen player. And to say other teams will have weapons comparable to Chase and Higgins is just foolish. But par for the course with you. It’s funny how logic escapes the mind when needing to win an argument.
February 10, 20241 yr comment_1736560 14 hours ago, T-Dub said: Don't forget Pickett. And yet every NFL team would rather have any of those guys, maybe aside from Flacco for a variety of reasons, over Browning. Yes, even Pickett. I would actually take Flacco over Browning if only needed for 5-6 games or less. Browning is an extremely limited QB with a very low ceiling. Hmm, TDub and Sparky internet GMs of the Year’s opinions or NFL execs opinions. Tough one here… Maybe the Bengals have offers for him, but are holding out for that top 5 pick he’s going to warrant because he’s more efficient than 5 QBs that Sparky listed?
February 11, 20241 yr comment_1736664 I have it on good authority that the Bengals will go RT in Round 1. That good authority is all the mocks drafts I have done.
February 11, 20241 yr comment_1736666 22 hours ago, IKOTA said: And yet every NFL team would rather have any of those guys, maybe aside from Flacco for a variety of reasons, over Browning. Yes, even Pickett. I would actually take Flacco over Browning if only needed for 5-6 games or less. Browning is an extremely limited QB with a very low ceiling. Hmm, TDub and Sparky internet GMs of the Year’s opinions or NFL execs opinions. Tough one here… Maybe the Bengals have offers for him, but are holding out for that top 5 pick he’s going to warrant because he’s more efficient than 5 QBs that Sparky listed? I see you're still stuck on stupid. You probably thought Jamarcus Russell and Ryan Leaf would be great NFL QBs. You can go to NFL.com and sort the passing stats yourself but I've done the work for you. Everyone has an opinion, let's look at actual results. Here are first year starters from 2023. Most are rookie but Browning and Love are included. Here is Browning compared to some other prominent QBs. He doesn't look out of place there does, he? But nobody would give up more than a 6th for that level of production according to you. Here he is Browning compared to the last 5 QBs taken as the #1 overall pick. Hm. Your insistence that no other NFL team would give more than a late round pick for Browning doesn't seem to have much basis in reality.
February 11, 20241 yr comment_1736696 1 hour ago, sparky151 said: I see you're still stuck on stupid. You probably thought Jamarcus Russell and Ryan Leaf would be great NFL QBs. You can go to NFL.com and sort the passing stats yourself but I've done the work for you. Everyone has an opinion, let's look at actual results. Here are first year starters from 2023. Most are rookie but Browning and Love are included. Here is Browning compared to some other prominent QBs. He doesn't look out of place there does, he? But nobody would give up more than a 6th for that level of production according to you. Here he is Browning compared to the last 5 QBs taken as the #1 overall pick. Hm. Your insistence that no other NFL team would give more than a late round pick for Browning doesn't seem to have much basis in reality. You’re right about one thing, I am stuck on stupid/you, as I keep replying. You know what, I’m with you now after seeing how efficient browning is. I say hold out for a top 10 pick or no Browning for all these teams that have lined up to acquire him via giving up draft picks. How many teams do you think have offered a good pick? I’ll say at least 12 or so. They’re just doing a great job of keeping it a secret because they don’t want the other nfl execs, who obviously aren’t as smart, to know Brownings true value (so damn efficient).
February 12, 20241 yr comment_1736985 Nice X thread on some guys to look at. At 18 some guys that stand out: Byron Muprhy(!!!) Mims Fuaga Latu Powers-Johnson Mitchell Dejean
February 12, 20241 yr comment_1736990 Mock draft Monday 18. Taliese FuagaOT Oregon State 49. Ladd McConkeyWR Georgia 80. Ben SinnottTE Kansas State 115. Michael Hall Jr.DT Ohio State 147. Marshawn LloydRB USC 174. Jarius MonroeCB Tulane 195. Bryan AddisonS Oregon 234. Kenneth HorseyOG Kentucky 251. Marcus HarrisDT Auburn
February 12, 20241 yr comment_1736992 1 hour ago, Jamie_B said: Mock draft Monday 18. Taliese FuagaOT Oregon State 49. Ladd McConkeyWR Georgia 80. Ben SinnottTE Kansas State 115. Michael Hall Jr.DT Ohio State 147. Marshawn LloydRB USC 174. Jarius MonroeCB Tulane 195. Bryan AddisonS Oregon 234. Kenneth HorseyOG Kentucky 251. Marcus HarrisDT Auburn Nice draft
February 12, 20241 yr comment_1737013 8 hours ago, Jamie_B said: Mock draft Monday 18. Taliese FuagaOT Oregon State 49. Ladd McConkeyWR Georgia IDK who he is but I want McConkey on the team.
February 12, 20241 yr comment_1737014 6 minutes ago, T-Dub said: IDK who he is but I want McConkey on the team. Georgia WR, killed it at the Sr. Bowl. Was mocked to us in the 2nd by Dan Brugler of the Athletic. Seems like a Boyd replacement from what I have read.
February 13, 20241 yr comment_1737017 53 minutes ago, Jamie_B said: Georgia WR, killed it at the Sr. Bowl. Was mocked to us in the 2nd by Dan Brugler of the Athletic. Seems like a Boyd replacement from what I have read. Dude sells the route, really good vision setting up his blockers and finding soft spots in coverage. Some nice contested catches as well. Might have to learn the hard way when to go for YAC and when to just make the catch and protect himself, he's not going to juke NFL safeties that easily. Looks pretty seasoned for a college kid overall though, like he could be getting snaps right away.
February 13, 20241 yr comment_1737018 5 minutes ago, T-Dub said: Dude sells the route, really good vision setting up his blockers and finding soft spots in coverage. Some nice contested catches as well. Might have to learn the hard way when to go for YAC and when to just make the catch and protect himself, he's not going to juke NFL safeties that easily. Looks pretty seasoned for a college kid overall though, like he could be getting snaps right away. If Sweat isnt there when we are up in 2, and this kid is I'm taking him.
February 13, 20241 yr comment_1737083 Dane Brugler has an updated Top 100 https://theathletic.com/5270481/2024/02/13/nfl-draft-2024-prospect-rankings-top-100/
February 13, 20241 yr comment_1737111 1 hour ago, Jamie_B said: Bowers isnt going to be there. ... I would say less than a 5% chance. But if he was, you have to take him.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.