snarkster Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 While I'm fine with Sewell or Chase at number five, if I could trade down a few spots and pick up an extra 2nd or 3rd Rd pick (minimum), I'd still go for it (especially if a top-fice QB is there. As excellent as Sewell & Chase appear to be, this club has a lot more holes to fill. Staying at five and going 01. Pennei Sewell/Ja'Marr Chase. 02. Daymi Brown/Alex Leatherwood (or) Landon Dickerson 03. (Edge Rusher) would be good, but I'd like (Example): 01. (OL) Rashawn Slater 2A. (ED) Payton Turner 2B. (WR) Daymi Brown 3A. (OL) Trey Smith 3B. (OC) Creed Humphrey A lot better coming out of day 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 28 minutes ago, T-Dub said: How was this possible without Jamaar Chase on the team? They expected to get something out of this guy named AJ Green. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 31 minutes ago, T-Dub said: How was this possible without Jamaar Chase on the team? They had AJ Green? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 14 minutes ago, spicoli said: They had AJ Green? Ah, of course. 523 yards and 2 TD's is the kind of elite production you just can't find outside of a top 5 draft pick. To be fair, he was playing with backup QB's. Remind me why that was again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 19 minutes ago, T-Dub said: 523 yards and 2 TD's Yeah I don’t think that was part of the plan.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 20 minutes ago, spicoli said: Yeah I don’t think that was part of the plan.. There's a plan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_C_Deadpeople Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 32 minutes ago, T-Dub said: There's a plan? Even the lack of a plan is still a plan lol. “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice “ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 16 Report Share Posted April 16 1 hour ago, T-Dub said: There's a plan? Yeah the plan is to take Chase at 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 54 minutes ago, spicoli said: Yeah the plan is to take Chase at 5 and in which round are we taking the back-up QB? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 22 minutes ago, T-Dub said: and in which round are we taking the back-up QB? that’s a good question...I do believe they’ll take one actually. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 2 hours ago, I_C_Deadpeople said: “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice “ Your Pride of Willowdale is showing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 2 hours ago, spicoli said: that’s a good question...I do believe they’ll take one actually. Jokes aside they probably should but with this roster? It's a shame the draft isn't at least 43 rounds long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRAPradio Posted April 17 Author Report Share Posted April 17 It seems like people who want to draft Sewell in the first, think that drafting Chase instead means the Bengals are somehow ignoring their offensive line...why is that? If they go oline in the 2nd and 3rd with good talent, isn’t that addressing it? It’s not like Sewell is light years ahead of every other tackle in this draft. Add two solid draft picks, Reiff and bring back Pollack seems like addressing the line to me. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_C_Deadpeople Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 2 hours ago, WRAPradio said: It seems like people who want to draft Sewell in the first, think that drafting Chase instead means the Bengals are somehow ignoring their offensive line...why is that? If they go oline in the 2nd and 3rd with good talent, isn’t that addressing it? It’s not like Sewell is light years ahead of every other tackle in this draft. Add two solid draft picks, Reiff and bring back Pollack seems like addressing the line to me. That would be fine if they actually follow through on rounds 2 and 3 but they are known to not follow through on just obvious plans. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spotto Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 21 minutes ago, I_C_Deadpeople said: That would be fine if they actually follow through on rounds 2 and 3 but they are known to not follow through on just obvious plans. FAgency has spent more time fixing the OL and not WR. That should say enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gupps Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 4 hours ago, WRAPradio said: It seems like people who want to draft Sewell in the first, think that drafting Chase instead means the Bengals are somehow ignoring their offensive line...why is that? If they go oline in the 2nd and 3rd with good talent, isn’t that addressing it? It’s not like Sewell is light years ahead of every other tackle in this draft. Add two solid draft picks, Reiff and bring back Pollack seems like addressing the line to me. I'd rather have a first round talent OL and a 2nd round talent WR than the other way around. 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 4 hours ago, Spotto said: FAgency has spent more time fixing the OL and not WR. That should say enough. They signed Reiff... Now how many moves did they make on defense? Dont see where you think theyve gone all on on oline... They still need to address both spots in first 2 rounds.. Question is what spot comes first no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 13 minutes ago, claptonrocks said: They signed Reiff... And he's not exactly some world-beater. At 32 & on a one year deal he's a Bandaid at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 37 minutes ago, T-Dub said: And he's not exactly some world-beater. At 32 & on a one year deal he's a Bandaid at best. Totally agree.. Reiff may be adequate for this year but i highly doubt theyll re-sign to an extension at 33yrs old... By drafting the highest rated OT this year they have it covered next season.. But we NEED Chase right?.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 23 minutes ago, claptonrocks said: Totally agree.. Reiff may be adequate for this year but i highly doubt theyll re-sign to an extension at 33yrs old... By drafting the highest rated OT this year they have it covered next season.. But we NEED Chase right?.. Sure we need Chase, we also need a MLB, a shut-down corner, a consistent 10+ sacks a year pass rusher, a run-stuffing DT, interior OL, reliable bookend OT's, a dynamic true TE with an attitude to finish blocks and drop the hammer on DBs to gain YAC, and a place kicker good enough to at least give them a chance beyond the 40 yard range, I'm probably forgetting a couple. Once we have most of those things we also badly need depth at pretty much any position besides RB, but particularly those positions prone to injury, namely OL and defensive front 7. Where would a championship-bound team rank "slightly faster WR" on that list of needs? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 2 hours ago, T-Dub said: Where would a championship-bound team rank "slightly faster WR" on that list of needs? That’s not us so what difference does it make? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 9 minutes ago, spicoli said: That’s not us so what difference does it make? If they use the same method of drafting flash over substance it will continue as it has been... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_C_Deadpeople Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 4 minutes ago, claptonrocks said: If they use the same method of drafting flash over substance it will continue as it has been... They will likely draft 2 OL between 2-4 and then. Y next season they won’t need to sign any other OL because they drafted these ones and they need to play. Same as they did with Og and Fisher - come he’ll or high water Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 1 hour ago, claptonrocks said: If they use the same method of drafting flash over substance it will continue as it has been... so what are you expecting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted April 17 Report Share Posted April 17 Just now, claptonrocks said: Deletion.. From the NFL? Probably appropriate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.