claptonrocks Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 3 minutes ago, spicoli said: How would I know? Sorry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 1 minute ago, claptonrocks said: Sorry Let me reiterate…the narrative is already in place so what difference does it make what I think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 48 minutes ago, spicoli said: Let me reiterate…the narrative is already in place so what difference does it make what I think? Well I guess you think your opinions to other members on here don't mean much.. They do... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted February 29 Report Share Posted February 29 If Becton doesn't find a market the first couple of days, I could see him coming here for a year as cover for a rookie RT. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 ^ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 12 minutes ago, BlackJesus said: ^ Seems Allways injured. Last year was first full one. 985 snaps 18 penalties 12 sacks allowed 53 pff. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Jersey Bengal Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 35 minutes ago, claptonrocks said: Seems Allways injured. Last year was first full one. 985 snaps 18 penalties 12 sacks allowed 53 pff. Awful 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelWeston Posted March 1 Author Report Share Posted March 1 I think they will shoot for someone who has some versatility and won't cost too much. I think this is probably the list they look at. Wynn makes some sense because he can play LG Draft Order Cap OL Age Overall Pass Block Run Block Snaps Starts 23/Career Notes Position 5 Fleming-Broncos 32 59.4 71.3 44.8 126 1/62 RT/LT Rascati 21 1 yr 2.35 Fant-Texans 32 61.7 68.4 51.9 1004 13/73 RT/LT Pollack 20 1 yr 3 3 Onwenu-Patriots 26 71.5 68 72.1 850 15/56 RT/RG/LG Rookie 3 Wynn-Dolphins 27 47.8 67.5 43.2 392 7/47 LG/RT/LT 1 yr 2.3 10 Nijman-Packers 28 61.7 65.8 60.3 259 1/22 RT/LT 1 yr 4.34 Eluemonor-Raiders 29 68.5 64.4 71.5 905 14/45 RT/RG 1 yr 3 8 Edoga-Cowboys 27 61.4 63.7 56.8 420 6/19 LT/LG/RT Pollack 20 1 yr 1.23 10 Becton-Jets 25 53.2 60.7 56.3 985 16/30 LT/RT Pollack 20 Rookie 4 Wilkinson-Cardinals 29 46.2 40.7 57.5 501 9/45 LG/RT/RG Rascati 20 1 yr 1.23 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 50 minutes ago, claptonrocks said: Seems Allways injured. Last year was first full one. 985 snaps 18 penalties 12 sacks allowed 53 pff. As you certainly know, very few FA’s of superior quality will be within the Bengals’ erstwhile price range. “untapped potential” is the selling point for the peanuts they might be willing to take away from Uno to pay anyone else. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_C_Deadpeople Posted March 1 Report Share Posted March 1 3 hours ago, BlackJesus said: ^ He is well past the untapped potential stage. He would need to resurrect himself to be average. He is more likely a backup at this point. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Dub Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 4 hours ago, claptonrocks said: Seems Allways injured. Last year was first full one. 985 snaps 18 penalties 12 sacks allowed 53 pff. Yikes, maybe they should bring back Jonah after all if this is their alternative. Is his connection to Pollack supposed to be a selling point or was that more like trivia? 🙄 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 20 hours ago, claptonrocks said: Seems Allways injured. Last year was first full one. 985 snaps 18 penalties 12 sacks allowed 53 pff. Curious what his numbers looked like the year that Pollack was with the Jets? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 I would sign Becton on a "prove it" deal (2 yr / 10 mill) and still draft Patrick Paul (similar body types) ... Then let them battle it out for the RT position in training camp. #IronSharpensIron 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 1 hour ago, Jamie_B said: Curious what his numbers looked like the year that Pollack was with the Jets? Pollack was Jets Oline coach in 2019 and 2020. Bechton missed all of 2019 injury.. 2020 he had 691 snaps 6 penalties 6 sacks 74.4 pff 2021 and 22 injured 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 22 hours ago, Le Tigre said: As you certainly know, very few FA’s of superior quality will be within the Bengals’ erstwhile price range. “untapped potential” is the selling point for the peanuts they might be willing to take away from Uno to pay anyone else. I want to see Chase put up some big numbers this year. I know he's a top WR But. 30 mil per is a helluva lot of money . I'm sure they'll sign him to a multi year extension even so. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 2 Report Share Posted March 2 19 hours ago, T-Dub said: Yikes, maybe they should bring back Jonah after all if this is their alternative. Is his connection to Pollack supposed to be a selling point or was that more like trivia? 🙄 Gotta wonder about if they would. Prolly not but it's a thought 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 14 hours ago, BlackJesus said: I would sign Becton on a "prove it" deal (2 yr / 10 mill) and still draft Patrick Paul (similar body types) ... Then let them battle it out for the RT position in training camp. #IronSharpensIron I propose a 2 yr 10 mil contract to Elumanor .( Where both parties walking away satisfied) . Bechton is not dependable. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 2 hours ago, claptonrocks said: I propose a 2 yr 10 mil contract to Elumanor . Because he's been more 'dependable', he's likely looking for something like 4 yr / 36 mill. He's flirted with the Bengals and Burrow on twitter, which means he might take a discount. But not that big I predict. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 There are reasons that OK-quality linemen (or players in general) are going to be available once this annual round of musical chairs begins. Not everything is “not enough money” either. Teams “move on” from their OK’s also because they are just OK…and that OK-ness “moves on” to other teams (like the Bengals). Lateral moves for both. If they likely pay close to the same amount for an OK Becton, etc., I always wonder why they just don’t keep the current OK Jonah? Just navel gazing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cricket Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 2 hours ago, Le Tigre said: Just navel gazing. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|BlackJesus| Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 2 hours ago, Le Tigre said: I always wonder why they just don’t keep the current OK Jonah? ... Because Jonah is worth about 9 a year and likely thinks he's worth twice that at 18. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stryker57 Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 why dont we keep Jonah ??? did you think our OL play was acceptable? No! there is your answer on Jonah. so we blame the lack of a run game on the RB, we dont blame the QB for poor pass blocking we also seem to blame the RB...., Do you all seriously this just changing out Mixon and running the same 5 OL out again is going to fix everything? let alone fix anything? didnt we have pretty much the same 5 out there all year ? well once the preseason was over and we let them play in live action on day 1 reg season.. the OL needs fixing. the only reason we seen any improvement from the start of the season to the end is because they sucked so bad in week 1. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted March 3 Report Share Posted March 3 1 hour ago, stryker57 said: why dont we keep Jonah ??? did you think our OL play was acceptable? No! there is your answer on Jonah. so we blame the lack of a run game on the RB, we dont blame the QB for poor pass blocking we also seem to blame the RB...., Do you all seriously this just changing out Mixon and running the same 5 OL out again is going to fix everything? let alone fix anything? didnt we have pretty much the same 5 out there all year ? well once the preseason was over and we let them play in live action on day 1 reg season.. the OL needs fixing. the only reason we seen any improvement from the start of the season to the end is because they sucked so bad in week 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 4 Report Share Posted March 4 22 hours ago, BlackJesus said: ... Because Jonah is worth about 9 a year and likely thinks he's worth twice that at 18. Alright…so what does that translate towards the other OK-or-less-quality replacements on the open market? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Tigre Posted March 4 Report Share Posted March 4 20 hours ago, stryker57 said: why dont we keep Jonah ??? did you think our OL play was acceptable? No! there is your answer on Jonah. It was a hypothetical question, not an endorsement. If he is OK-or-less…you have to find an OK-or-better for replacement. And…because there is “no money”…they need to be “on the cheap”. Do any of the projected FA’s mentioned meet that criteria? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.