Ole Gamer Joe Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 Why is Shaw not our starting corner every game? He is so good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 *sigh* Plays with toy...puts toy down for two years...someone else picks up toy to play with it (unbeknownst the toy was played with before) ...person who played with it two years ago gets pissy and acts like a 2 year old because someone else decided to play with his toy despite he hadn't touched it for two years, and despite that he had offered an olive branch to let him play with the toy when he wasn't able to More than a little tired of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
big_dish Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 What Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 7 hours ago, BengalRep85-9 said: The terrible - Marshall Faulk on the postgame show DESPERATELY trying to not talk about the Bengals. He legitimately verbally attacked Michael Irvin for a good 30 seconds for even mentioning speaking about the Bengals. When Irvin said they should talk about the winners instead of the losers, Faulk said that was ridiculous and to "let the producers produce the show". Rich Eisen even had to step in to break it up because Marshall was getting so belligerent at the thought of mentioning the Bengals. It's embarrassing the lengths he went to to avoid talking about the Bengals. He needs to be removed from working Bengal games (preferably all games) because he has a clear and huge bias. He's insufferable. It wasn't exactly that, it was more that they had a segment script that they had planned on talking about things in a certain order and Irvin went off script to give love to the Bengals (mostly glow over AJ Green as he does with WRs all the time) and Marshal who does seem to have a Bengals Bias got irritated that he went off script. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|Elflocko| Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 1 hour ago, Jamie_B said: *sigh* Plays with toy...puts toy down for two years...someone else picks up toy to play with it (unbeknownst the toy was played with before) ...person who played with it two years ago gets pissy and acts like a 2 year old because someone else decided to play with his toy despite he hadn't touched it for two years, and despite that he had offered an olive branch to let him play with the toy when he wasn't able to More than a little tired of this. What in the literal fuck does this even mean... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 Guy read post... Doesn't understand post..Goes back and reads post again.. Still doesn't understand post..Waits on someone to explainSent from my iPhone using Go-Bengals.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 2 hours ago, big_dish said: What Yes. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanvilleBengal Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 26 minutes ago, fluhartz said: Guy read post... Doesn't understand post.. Goes back and reads post again.. Still doesn't understand post.. Waits on someone to explain Sent from my iPhone using Go-Bengals.com Yeah, that. Jamie, I think you gotta explain your last post. That went a bit over my head as well--unless that has something related to that Marshall Faulk Bengals bias thing...And it seems like I'm not the only one that is a bit confused with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BengalBacker Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 1 hour ago, DanvilleBengal said: Yeah, that. Jamie, I think you gotta explain your last post. That went a bit over my head as well--unless that has something related to that Marshall Faulk Bengals bias thing...And it seems like I'm not the only one that is a bit confused with it. Just a guess, but I think it has something to do with Jason starting this thread instead of Jamie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluhartz Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 This fucking picture still makes me laugh out loud..even after seeing it a million times. Sent from my iPhone using Go-Bengals.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 lol as do I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rumble In the Jungle Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 The bad, us keeping Bodine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jason Posted September 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 I suspect Jamie's "confusing" post was directed at me. The thing is he and I have different memories of the event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RhodeIslandFan Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 I actually thought we did fine in all phases. Just got to predictable and conservative in the red zone. Once 85 returns that'll all round itself out. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RhodeIslandFan Posted September 30, 2016 Report Share Posted September 30, 2016 The terrible - Marshall Faulk on the postgame show DESPERATELY trying to not talk about the Bengals. He legitimately verbally attacked Michael Irvin for a good 30 seconds for even mentioning speaking about the Bengals. When Irvin said they should talk about the winners instead of the losers, Faulk said that was ridiculous and to "let the producers produce the show". Rich Eisen even had to step in to break it up because Marshall was getting so belligerent at the thought of mentioning the Bengals. It's embarrassing the lengths he went to to avoid talking about the Bengals. He needs to be removed from working Bengal games (preferably all games) because he has a clear and huge bias. He's insufferable. Yeah it was real strange. Thing that made it even stranger was the the defense of bengals coming from Erving, we're playing his cowboys next week. Falk is a real hater and made no effort to hide itSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 2 hours ago, Jason said: I suspect Jamie's "confusing" post was directed at me. The thing is he and I have different memories of the event. and I can verify Jason's version of the events. Not that it should be a big deal either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 smh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatternMaster Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 The passive aggressiveness on this thread is at an all time high. Jamie just admit you are pissed that Jason started what you feel entitled to, this weekly thread. Jason just admit you started this thread to piss Jamie off because you entitled to it because you used to do it originally. Seriously guys honesty is the best policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|Numbers| Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 9 minutes ago, PatternMaster said: The passive aggressiveness on this thread is at an all time high. Jamie just admit you are pissed that started what you feel entitled to, this weekly thread. Jason just admit you started this thread to piss Jamie off because you entitled to it because you used to do it originally. Seriously guys honesty is the best policy. If this is the case I take full blame for merging the thread with a somewhat exact duplicate thread. Difficult to do while on the mobile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 52 minutes ago, PatternMaster said: The passive aggressiveness on this thread is at an all time high. Jamie just admit you are pissed that started what you feel entitled to, this weekly thread. Jason just admit you started this thread to piss Jamie off because you entitled to it because you used to do it originally. Seriously guys honesty is the best policy. Pissed isnt the word, irritated is. I've tried to deal with this privately through PM, there were no GBU threads for 2 years and I had no memory of Jason doing them. As such I made one with no memory of Jason having had done them in the past. I have even gone so far as offering Jason an olive branch letting him know when I would miss a game (at least live) and asked him to create the thread, even as recently as the first game of the season as I was in ohio watching my nephews play soccer. So it not like he has no idea how I feel about it. The bottom line is he stopped making these threads and so I made them (unaware that he used to) and have been continuing to make them and he inserts his own when I am here to make them knowing how I feel about it because we have had this conversation privately (and why this post exists publicly because he keeps doing it) yet..... I thought by offering the olive branch of letting him have the thread when I couldnt post was more than fair but this is getting ridiculous. You walked away from posting these threads dude. Now that they are back and weekly and its not you starting them..... come on.... For those that doubt that use the board search function and find my first GBU thread, then find one made by Jason that is earlier than that one that isnt 2ish years older than my first thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|Numbers| Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 This post reminds me of Thursday evening at a restaurant in Cincinnati. I saw a relatively large individual wearing a Dolphin's jersey and decided I was going to have a little fun. He turns around and he has a cardboard sign around his neck that says Steeler's Suck. Next thing you know everything is all good. His wife was wearing a Geno jersey and they were from Canada. The moral of the story is that it does not matter where you are from at least we can all agree that the Stealers Suck.P. S. Who cares who starts the thread as long as it gets started and doesn't duplicate another thread ? Can't we all just get along ? #Stealerslivesdon'tmatterSent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|High School Harry| Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 30 minutes ago, Numbers said: This post reminds me of Thursday evening at a restaurant in Cincinnati. I saw a relatively large individual wearing a Dolphin's jersey and decided I was going to have a little fun. He turns around and he has a cardboard sign around his neck that says Steeler's Suck. Next thing you know everything is all good. His wife was wearing a Geno jersey and they were from Canada. The moral of the story is that it does not matter where you are from at least we can all agree that the Stealers Suck. P. S. Who cares who starts the thread as long as it gets started and doesn't duplicate another thread ? Can't we all just get along ? #Stealerslivesdon'tmatter Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk Shouldn't it have said "Stealers Suck, Eh?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
|Numbers| Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 Shouldn't it have said "Stealers Suck, Eh?"That guy was hilarious and probably would have confused some fans if they saw it spelled that way. I did get him to say those guys are hosers. Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengals1181 Posted October 1, 2016 Report Share Posted October 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Jamie_B said: For those that doubt that use the board search function and find my first GBU thread, then find one made by Jason that is earlier than that one that isnt 2ish years older than my first thread. first off, as Numbers said, who the hell cares who makes them? As far as accuracy goes, LOL WTF. You made one in 2008, 9 other people made one before you did, started by Jason. You wouldn't go on to start one for almost another 3 full years. A mere two weeks after Jason had last done one as shown below. So don't try to pretend you were doing it because Jason hadn't done it for years. You wanted it, you took it. And like he's doing now, Jason took the high road about it. But again, why does it matter who does them? Why the public temper tantrum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.