membengal Posted March 21, 2021 Report Share Posted March 21, 2021 I am opposite you on Chase. If he's there and Sewell gone, sign me up. And for me, it's close if he and Sewell are both there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gupps Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 53 minutes ago, membengal said: I am opposite you on Chase. If he's there and Sewell gone, sign me up. And for me, it's close if he and Sewell are both there. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if neither one of them are there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 Think this could go down? 1..Jax.....Lawrence 2.NYJ.......Justin Fields 3..Mia.......Sewell 4.Atl..........Pitts or Chase 5. Cinn.......Chase or Pitts 6..Phila......Wilson 7. Det........Waddle No trades in this.. I hope not..😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snarkster Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 1..Jax.....Lawrence 2.NYJ.......Justin Fields 3..Mia.......Sewell 4.Atl..........Chase or Pitts 5. Trade w/Det.....Wilson or Lance (Bengals receive at least a 3rd Round pick from Lions) 6..PHI...Lance or Wilson 7. CIN...Slater (or Chase/Pitts) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
claptonrocks Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 I liked it ..Until.. Why would Detroit look fir a QB when they traded for Jared Goff??? Lions have ti replace Marvin Jones and Waddle could fit the bill.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_C_Deadpeople Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 6 hours ago, claptonrocks said: I liked it ..Until.. Why would Detroit look fir a QB when they traded for Jared Goff??? Lions have ti replace Marvin Jones and Waddle could fit the bill.. There has been chatter about the Lions looking at QB - despite having Goff. Goff was a salary dump for the Rams, so can he be trusted to get his game back? They may wait a year on this though. Adam Schefter said 'there will be 4 QB's taken in the first 7 picks, take it to the bank'. Top of the draft is very interesting this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 10 hours ago, claptonrocks said: Think this could go down? 1..Jax.....Lawrence 2.NYJ.......Justin Fields 3..Mia.......Sewell 4.Atl..........Pitts or Chase 5. Cinn.......Chase or Pitts 6..Phila......Wilson 7. Det........Waddle No trades in this.. I hope not..😎 I think you could see a scenario where its 1. Jax - Lawrence, 2. NYC - Sewell 3. Mia - Chase 4. Atl - Fields. 5. Cin........ If that happens I trade down (but not out of the top 10) and take the best T available at the spot we trade down to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky151 Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 1 hour ago, Jamie_B said: I think you could see a scenario where its 1. Jax - Lawrence, 2. NYC - Sewell 3. Mia - Chase 4. Atl - Fields. 5. Cin........ If that happens I trade down (but not out of the top 10) and take the best T available at the spot we trade down to. In your scenario, there should be a lot of demand for Wilson so we should be able to get a good price for pick 5. If for some reason we couldn't make a deal, then I'd prefer Pitts as the pick for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, sparky151 said: In your scenario, there should be a lot of demand for Wilson so we should be able to get a good price for pick 5. If for some reason we couldn't make a deal, then I'd prefer Pitts as the pick for us. Pitts or Farley. I know we just signed two CBs but I'm not convinced that Awuzie is going to be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 So many of the people who cover the team or have sources are so dismissive of Pitts at 5 that I am pretty sure he is not in their plans. Lapham, Dragon, Dehner, a few others - lots of cold water there. Pretty sure it is WR or o-line or trade down at 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sox Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 Did this one for fun-full disclosure-Sewell was available, but I was tired of picking him every time, so I switched up. I thought it actually turned out ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEarl Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 33 minutes ago, spicoli said: I would be on the record that a stud TE would help the Bengals offense more than a stud WR. None the less, I still want the tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 11 minutes ago, UncleEarl said: I would be on the record that a stud TE would help the Bengals offense more than a stud WR. None the less, I still want the tackle. I mean, for all intent and purposes, Pitts is pretty much a WR in the fact that he's going to almost always be lined up either outside or in the slot. Sure he'll line up inside some but not enough to call him an actual "TE" IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEarl Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 7 minutes ago, spicoli said: I mean, for all intent and purposes, Pitts is pretty much a WR in the fact that he's going to almost always be lined up either outside or in the slot. Sure he'll line up inside some but not enough to call him an actual "TE" IMO. He is a TE and should be a physical mismatch for many players on the field. That's what all the great TEs are. Gronkowski, Kelce, etc. Good luck covering them in the middle of the field. Frankly, the 40 time is just window dressing. Running good routes, using your body to shield the ball, etc. are far more important. If this guy is that good, which I have no idea, he would be more valuable to the Bengals. A guy you can target 10+ times a game that is very difficult to cover trumps another good WR. Good TEs are third down machines. The Bengals need that more than another WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 Sorry but if he’s lined up in the slot, in the Y or in the Z positions he’s essentially a WR at that point and he’ll be lined up in those spots MUCH more than he will be in-line....not that they won’t ever use him that way as well. That said though, if Chase and Pitts are sitting there, they’re taking Chase all day long. 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEarl Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, spicoli said: Sorry but if he’s lined up in the slot, in the Y or in the Z positions he’s essentially a WR at that point. He’ll be lined up in those spots MUCH more than he will be in-line....not that they won’t ever use him that ways swell. That said, if Chase and Pitts are sitting there, they’re taking Chase all day long. 100%. Totally different matchup. If Pitts is in the slot he isn’t going to be covered by a 190 lb CB, but if he is that’s good for the Bengals. It makes a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spicoli Posted March 22, 2021 Report Share Posted March 22, 2021 Lol I’m not going to keep arguing this but the slot, Y and Z are WR positions. When you put a TE out there he takes the place of a WR...so at that point he becomes just an oversized WR that creates mismatches. Call him TE all you want but he’s going to be lined up as a WR a lot more often than he is in-line. Semantics I know but it makes a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmoothD Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 Really hope the pick at 5 is Pitts. He is going to be a matchup nightmare. Especially if his 4.46 40 time is legit. And for those doubting is route running, check out the move at the 4:20 mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelWeston Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 What's more important for Joe Burrows success. A. Good Offensive Line play B. A 4th very good weapon to go with Boyd-Higgins-Mixon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie_B Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 34 minutes ago, MichaelWeston said: What's more important for Joe Burrows success. A. Good Offensive Line play B. A 4th very good weapon to go with Boyd-Higgins-Mixon Because you can't have both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
membengal Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 Oof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleEarl Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 31 minutes ago, Jamie_B said: Because you can't have both? They are a long way from one, and close to the other. Priorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelWeston Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 36 minutes ago, Jamie_B said: Because you can't have both? Not with pick 5. And then you are taking a risk you can't get it with pick 38. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelWeston Posted March 23, 2021 Report Share Posted March 23, 2021 5 minutes ago, UncleEarl said: They are a long way from one, and close to the other. Priorities. Truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.